{"title":"源结构是对齐变化的关键","authors":"P. M. Noorlander","doi":"10.1075/JHL.19046.NOO","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Alignment patterns in the Eastern varieties of modern Aramaic varieties are generally said to originate in an\n ergative source construction based on the so-called ‘passive’ participle qṭīl- ‘killed’ and the preposition\n l- where ergative person markers gradually extended to all intransitive predicates. While various source\n constructions have been suggested, this article demonstrates that most explanatory power and scope for the complex historical\n background of the alignment microvariation in Neo-Aramaic is offered by the typology of resultatives. There was instability from\n the beginning due to the versatile nature of resultatives and the increasing polyfunctionality of the preposition\n l-. This, in turn, indicates that the suggested source constructions for ergative alignment need not be\n mutually exclusive. Moreover, this also points to ergativity as merely one among several outcomes rather than the original\n source.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Source constructions as a key to alignment change\",\"authors\":\"P. M. Noorlander\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/JHL.19046.NOO\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Alignment patterns in the Eastern varieties of modern Aramaic varieties are generally said to originate in an\\n ergative source construction based on the so-called ‘passive’ participle qṭīl- ‘killed’ and the preposition\\n l- where ergative person markers gradually extended to all intransitive predicates. While various source\\n constructions have been suggested, this article demonstrates that most explanatory power and scope for the complex historical\\n background of the alignment microvariation in Neo-Aramaic is offered by the typology of resultatives. There was instability from\\n the beginning due to the versatile nature of resultatives and the increasing polyfunctionality of the preposition\\n l-. This, in turn, indicates that the suggested source constructions for ergative alignment need not be\\n mutually exclusive. Moreover, this also points to ergativity as merely one among several outcomes rather than the original\\n source.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHL.19046.NOO\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHL.19046.NOO","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Alignment patterns in the Eastern varieties of modern Aramaic varieties are generally said to originate in an
ergative source construction based on the so-called ‘passive’ participle qṭīl- ‘killed’ and the preposition
l- where ergative person markers gradually extended to all intransitive predicates. While various source
constructions have been suggested, this article demonstrates that most explanatory power and scope for the complex historical
background of the alignment microvariation in Neo-Aramaic is offered by the typology of resultatives. There was instability from
the beginning due to the versatile nature of resultatives and the increasing polyfunctionality of the preposition
l-. This, in turn, indicates that the suggested source constructions for ergative alignment need not be
mutually exclusive. Moreover, this also points to ergativity as merely one among several outcomes rather than the original
source.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.