源结构是对齐变化的关键

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
P. M. Noorlander
{"title":"源结构是对齐变化的关键","authors":"P. M. Noorlander","doi":"10.1075/JHL.19046.NOO","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Alignment patterns in the Eastern varieties of modern Aramaic varieties are generally said to originate in an\n ergative source construction based on the so-called ‘passive’ participle qṭīl- ‘killed’ and the preposition\n l- where ergative person markers gradually extended to all intransitive predicates. While various source\n constructions have been suggested, this article demonstrates that most explanatory power and scope for the complex historical\n background of the alignment microvariation in Neo-Aramaic is offered by the typology of resultatives. There was instability from\n the beginning due to the versatile nature of resultatives and the increasing polyfunctionality of the preposition\n l-. This, in turn, indicates that the suggested source constructions for ergative alignment need not be\n mutually exclusive. Moreover, this also points to ergativity as merely one among several outcomes rather than the original\n source.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Source constructions as a key to alignment change\",\"authors\":\"P. M. Noorlander\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/JHL.19046.NOO\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Alignment patterns in the Eastern varieties of modern Aramaic varieties are generally said to originate in an\\n ergative source construction based on the so-called ‘passive’ participle qṭīl- ‘killed’ and the preposition\\n l- where ergative person markers gradually extended to all intransitive predicates. While various source\\n constructions have been suggested, this article demonstrates that most explanatory power and scope for the complex historical\\n background of the alignment microvariation in Neo-Aramaic is offered by the typology of resultatives. There was instability from\\n the beginning due to the versatile nature of resultatives and the increasing polyfunctionality of the preposition\\n l-. This, in turn, indicates that the suggested source constructions for ergative alignment need not be\\n mutually exclusive. Moreover, this also points to ergativity as merely one among several outcomes rather than the original\\n source.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHL.19046.NOO\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JHL.19046.NOO","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代阿拉姆语东方变体的排列模式通常被认为起源于一个否定源结构,该结构基于所谓的“被动”分词qṭīl-“杀死”和介词l-其中否定人称标记逐渐扩展到所有不及物谓词。虽然有各种各样的来源结构被提出,但本文表明,对新阿拉姆语中排列微变化的复杂历史背景最具解释力和范围的是结果类型学。从一开始就不稳定,因为结果式的多用途性质和介词l-的多功能性不断增加。反过来,这表明,建议的负对齐源结构不必是相互排斥的。此外,这也指出,负性只是几个结果之一,而不是最初的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Source constructions as a key to alignment change
Alignment patterns in the Eastern varieties of modern Aramaic varieties are generally said to originate in an ergative source construction based on the so-called ‘passive’ participle qṭīl- ‘killed’ and the preposition l- where ergative person markers gradually extended to all intransitive predicates. While various source constructions have been suggested, this article demonstrates that most explanatory power and scope for the complex historical background of the alignment microvariation in Neo-Aramaic is offered by the typology of resultatives. There was instability from the beginning due to the versatile nature of resultatives and the increasing polyfunctionality of the preposition l-. This, in turn, indicates that the suggested source constructions for ergative alignment need not be mutually exclusive. Moreover, this also points to ergativity as merely one among several outcomes rather than the original source.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Historical Linguistics
Journal of Historical Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信