低法向应力下土工合成材料界面摩擦的评估:两种不同试验程序的比较

Paolo Pavanello, Paolo Carrubba, Nicola Moraci
{"title":"低法向应力下土工合成材料界面摩擦的评估:两种不同试验程序的比较","authors":"Paolo Pavanello, Paolo Carrubba, Nicola Moraci","doi":"10.22630/aspa.2022.21.4.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The interface friction between geosynthetics has previously been extensively studied with reference to medium-high contact stresses. The interface strength at low contact stress is a less investigated chapter whose importance, however, is evident for the stability of geosynthetic landfill barriers during the construction stage and of the covering systems. The inclined plane is the most used laboratory test for measuring the geosynthetic interface friction at normal stresses as low as 5 kPa. This type of test, however, is not free from criticalities, due to the non-uniformity of the contact stresses induced by the inclination of the plane. Alternatively, it is possible to extrapolate the results of the classic direct shear test, which, however, generally cannot be performed at such low contact stress values. The paper compares data results provided by inclined plane tests and an experimental apparatus capable of performing horizontal shear tests at a vertical stress of 5 kPa. The peculiarity of this device is to guarantee a constant growth rate of the tangential stress equivalent to what happens with the inclined plane test. The good agreement of the interface strength data obtained for two different geosynthetic interfaces leads the way for possible future innovations and insights on the topic.","PeriodicalId":33811,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Architectura","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of geosynthetic interface friction at low normal stress: comparison between two different test procedures\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Pavanello, Paolo Carrubba, Nicola Moraci\",\"doi\":\"10.22630/aspa.2022.21.4.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The interface friction between geosynthetics has previously been extensively studied with reference to medium-high contact stresses. The interface strength at low contact stress is a less investigated chapter whose importance, however, is evident for the stability of geosynthetic landfill barriers during the construction stage and of the covering systems. The inclined plane is the most used laboratory test for measuring the geosynthetic interface friction at normal stresses as low as 5 kPa. This type of test, however, is not free from criticalities, due to the non-uniformity of the contact stresses induced by the inclination of the plane. Alternatively, it is possible to extrapolate the results of the classic direct shear test, which, however, generally cannot be performed at such low contact stress values. The paper compares data results provided by inclined plane tests and an experimental apparatus capable of performing horizontal shear tests at a vertical stress of 5 kPa. The peculiarity of this device is to guarantee a constant growth rate of the tangential stress equivalent to what happens with the inclined plane test. The good agreement of the interface strength data obtained for two different geosynthetic interfaces leads the way for possible future innovations and insights on the topic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Architectura\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Architectura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22630/aspa.2022.21.4.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Architectura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22630/aspa.2022.21.4.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土工合成材料之间的界面摩擦以前已经参考中高接触应力进行了广泛的研究。低接触应力下的界面强度是一个研究较少的章节,然而,其重要性对于施工阶段土工合成垃圾填埋场屏障和覆盖系统的稳定性是显而易见的。斜面是测量法向应力低至5kPa时土工合成材料界面摩擦最常用的实验室试验。然而,由于平面倾斜引起的接触应力不均匀,这种类型的试验并非没有临界值。或者,可以推断出经典直接剪切试验的结果,然而,通常不能在如此低的接触应力值下进行。本文比较了斜面试验和能够在5kPa垂直应力下进行水平剪切试验的实验装置提供的数据结果。该装置的特点是保证切向应力的恒定增长率,与斜面试验相当。两种不同土工合成材料界面获得的界面强度数据的良好一致性为未来可能的创新和对该主题的见解开辟了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of geosynthetic interface friction at low normal stress: comparison between two different test procedures
The interface friction between geosynthetics has previously been extensively studied with reference to medium-high contact stresses. The interface strength at low contact stress is a less investigated chapter whose importance, however, is evident for the stability of geosynthetic landfill barriers during the construction stage and of the covering systems. The inclined plane is the most used laboratory test for measuring the geosynthetic interface friction at normal stresses as low as 5 kPa. This type of test, however, is not free from criticalities, due to the non-uniformity of the contact stresses induced by the inclination of the plane. Alternatively, it is possible to extrapolate the results of the classic direct shear test, which, however, generally cannot be performed at such low contact stress values. The paper compares data results provided by inclined plane tests and an experimental apparatus capable of performing horizontal shear tests at a vertical stress of 5 kPa. The peculiarity of this device is to guarantee a constant growth rate of the tangential stress equivalent to what happens with the inclined plane test. The good agreement of the interface strength data obtained for two different geosynthetic interfaces leads the way for possible future innovations and insights on the topic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信