最近邻居的距离,而不是群体的大小,影响着城市黑头鸥(Chroicocephalus ridibundus)的警觉

IF 0.7 4区 生物学 Q3 ORNITHOLOGY
Ivana Novčič, Z. Vidović
{"title":"最近邻居的距离,而不是群体的大小,影响着城市黑头鸥(Chroicocephalus ridibundus)的警觉","authors":"Ivana Novčič, Z. Vidović","doi":"10.1080/00063657.2021.1974339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Capsule The total flock size and number of nearby neighbours did not affect vigilance behaviour in the Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus, but an increase in the nearest neighbour distance had a positive effect on measures of vigilance. Aims Vigilance allows animals to detect environmental stimuli, such as the presence of predators or competitors. Vigilance entails costs, however, because individuals may devote less time to other biologically important activities. We examined the trade-off between preening and vigilance in wintering Black-headed Gulls, while simultaneously considering the role of several confounding variables. Methods Using multivariate regression models we examined the effect of several predictors on three common measures of vigilance: scan frequency, average scan duration, and the percentage of time allocated to scanning. Results We did not detect a group-size effect on vigilance, but an increase in the nearest-neighbour distance had a positive effect on scanning frequency and the proportion of time focal gulls allocated to scanning. In addition, individuals at the periphery of flocks scanned their environment more frequently compared to centrally positioned gulls. Other variables that had significant effects on vigilance were location of roosting flocks, ambient temperature and wind speed. Conclusions In general, this study indicates that antipredator vigilance played an important role in overall vigilance in preening gulls in an urban environment.","PeriodicalId":55353,"journal":{"name":"Bird Study","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nearest-neighbour distance, rather than group size, affects vigilance in urban flocks of preening Black-headed Gulls Chroicocephalus ridibundus\",\"authors\":\"Ivana Novčič, Z. Vidović\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00063657.2021.1974339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Capsule The total flock size and number of nearby neighbours did not affect vigilance behaviour in the Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus, but an increase in the nearest neighbour distance had a positive effect on measures of vigilance. Aims Vigilance allows animals to detect environmental stimuli, such as the presence of predators or competitors. Vigilance entails costs, however, because individuals may devote less time to other biologically important activities. We examined the trade-off between preening and vigilance in wintering Black-headed Gulls, while simultaneously considering the role of several confounding variables. Methods Using multivariate regression models we examined the effect of several predictors on three common measures of vigilance: scan frequency, average scan duration, and the percentage of time allocated to scanning. Results We did not detect a group-size effect on vigilance, but an increase in the nearest-neighbour distance had a positive effect on scanning frequency and the proportion of time focal gulls allocated to scanning. In addition, individuals at the periphery of flocks scanned their environment more frequently compared to centrally positioned gulls. Other variables that had significant effects on vigilance were location of roosting flocks, ambient temperature and wind speed. Conclusions In general, this study indicates that antipredator vigilance played an important role in overall vigilance in preening gulls in an urban environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bird Study\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bird Study\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2021.1974339\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORNITHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bird Study","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2021.1974339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要胶囊白头鸥的总种群规模和附近邻居的数量不会影响其警惕行为,但最近邻居距离的增加对警惕措施有积极影响。警惕性使动物能够检测环境刺激,例如捕食者或竞争对手的存在。然而,保持警惕需要付出代价,因为个人可能会花更少的时间从事其他生物学上重要的活动。我们研究了越冬黑嘴鸥的梳理和警惕之间的权衡,同时考虑了几个混杂变量的作用。方法使用多元回归模型,我们检验了几种预测因素对三种常见的警惕性指标的影响:扫描频率、平均扫描持续时间和分配给扫描的时间百分比。结果我们没有发现群体规模对警惕性的影响,但最近邻距离的增加对扫描频率和分配给扫描的时间焦海鸥的比例有积极影响。此外,与位于中心位置的海鸥相比,处于鸟群外围的个体更频繁地扫描环境。对警惕性有显著影响的其他变量包括栖息羊群的位置、环境温度和风速。结论总体而言,本研究表明,在城市环境中对海鸥进行梳理时,反捕食者的警惕性在整体警惕性中发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nearest-neighbour distance, rather than group size, affects vigilance in urban flocks of preening Black-headed Gulls Chroicocephalus ridibundus
ABSTRACT Capsule The total flock size and number of nearby neighbours did not affect vigilance behaviour in the Black-headed Gull Chroicocephalus ridibundus, but an increase in the nearest neighbour distance had a positive effect on measures of vigilance. Aims Vigilance allows animals to detect environmental stimuli, such as the presence of predators or competitors. Vigilance entails costs, however, because individuals may devote less time to other biologically important activities. We examined the trade-off between preening and vigilance in wintering Black-headed Gulls, while simultaneously considering the role of several confounding variables. Methods Using multivariate regression models we examined the effect of several predictors on three common measures of vigilance: scan frequency, average scan duration, and the percentage of time allocated to scanning. Results We did not detect a group-size effect on vigilance, but an increase in the nearest-neighbour distance had a positive effect on scanning frequency and the proportion of time focal gulls allocated to scanning. In addition, individuals at the periphery of flocks scanned their environment more frequently compared to centrally positioned gulls. Other variables that had significant effects on vigilance were location of roosting flocks, ambient temperature and wind speed. Conclusions In general, this study indicates that antipredator vigilance played an important role in overall vigilance in preening gulls in an urban environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bird Study
Bird Study 生物-鸟类学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bird Study publishes high quality papers relevant to the sphere of interest of the British Trust for Ornithology: broadly defined as field ornithology; especially when related to evidence-based bird conservation. Papers are especially welcome on: patterns of distribution and abundance, movements, habitat preferences, developing field census methods, ringing and other techniques for marking and tracking birds. Bird Study concentrates on birds that occur in the Western Palearctic. This includes research on their biology outside of the Western Palearctic, for example on wintering grounds in Africa. Bird Study also welcomes papers from any part of the world if they are of general interest to the broad areas of investigation outlined above. Bird Study publishes the following types of articles: -Original research papers of any length -Short original research papers (less than 2500 words in length) -Scientific reviews -Forum articles covering general ornithological issues, including non-scientific ones -Short feedback articles that make scientific criticisms of papers published recently in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信