特斯拉试验:原理、方案和设计

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
O. Zaidat, S. A. Kasab, Sunil A. Sheth, S. Ortega‐Gutierrez, A. Rai, C. Given, R. Grandhi, M. Mokin, J. Katz, A. Maud, Rishi Gupta, Wade S. Smith, D. Dippel, D. Gress, Thanh N. Nguyen, S. Brown, A. Jadhav, Lucas Eljovich, C. Majoie, Mary S. Patterson, H. Slight, Kristine Below, A. Yoo
{"title":"特斯拉试验:原理、方案和设计","authors":"O. Zaidat, S. A. Kasab, Sunil A. Sheth, S. Ortega‐Gutierrez, A. Rai, C. Given, R. Grandhi, M. Mokin, J. Katz, A. Maud, Rishi Gupta, Wade S. Smith, D. Dippel, D. Gress, Thanh N. Nguyen, S. Brown, A. Jadhav, Lucas Eljovich, C. Majoie, Mary S. Patterson, H. Slight, Kristine Below, A. Yoo","doi":"10.1161/svin.122.000787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Mechanical thrombectomy has been shown to be effective in patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large‐vessel occlusion and small to moderate infarct volume. However, there are no randomized clinical trials for large‐core infarct volume comparing mechanical thrombectomy to medical therapy in the population selected based solely on noncontrast computed tomography brain scan. The TESLA (Thrombectomy for Emergent Salvage of Large Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke) randomized clinical trial is designed to address this clinical question.\n \n \n \n The TESLA trial aim is to demonstrate the efficacy (3‐month and 1‐year disability following stroke) and safety of intraarterial mechanical thrombectomy in patients with large‐volume infarction assessed with a noncontrast computed tomography scan. The TESLA trial design is a prospective, randomized controlled, multicenter, open‐label, assessor‐blinded anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke trial with adaptive enrichment design, enrolling up to 300 patients. Patients with anterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion who meet the imaging and clinical eligibility criteria with a large‐core infarction on the basis of noncontrast computed tomography Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (2–5) adjudicated by a site investigator will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo intraarterial thrombectomy or best medical management up to 24 hours from last known well.\n \n \n \n The primary efficacy outcome is utility‐weighted modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score distribution at 90 days between the groups. The results will be based on an intention‐to‐treat analysis that will examine the Bayesian posterior probability that, adjusted for Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, patients with large‐core infarct volume treated with intra‐arterial thrombectomy have higher expected utility‐weighted mRS than those treated with best medical management alone. The primary safety outcome is the 90‐day death rate. Key secondary outcomes are dichotomized mRS 0 to 2 and 0 to 3 outcomes, ordinal mRS scores, and quality of life (EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level survey) at 90 days and 1 year, utility‐weighted mRS at 1 year, hemicraniectomy rate, and rate of 24‐hour symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in both groups.\n \n \n \n TESLA is a pragmatic trial, designed to address the unanswered question of the efficacy and safety of intra‐arterial thrombectomy in patients with large infarcts diagnosed by the site investigator only on noncontrast computed tomography scan secondary to anterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion up to 24 hours from stroke symptoms onset.\n","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TESLA Trial: Rationale, Protocol, and Design\",\"authors\":\"O. Zaidat, S. A. Kasab, Sunil A. Sheth, S. Ortega‐Gutierrez, A. Rai, C. Given, R. Grandhi, M. Mokin, J. Katz, A. Maud, Rishi Gupta, Wade S. Smith, D. Dippel, D. Gress, Thanh N. Nguyen, S. Brown, A. Jadhav, Lucas Eljovich, C. Majoie, Mary S. Patterson, H. Slight, Kristine Below, A. Yoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/svin.122.000787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Mechanical thrombectomy has been shown to be effective in patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large‐vessel occlusion and small to moderate infarct volume. However, there are no randomized clinical trials for large‐core infarct volume comparing mechanical thrombectomy to medical therapy in the population selected based solely on noncontrast computed tomography brain scan. The TESLA (Thrombectomy for Emergent Salvage of Large Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke) randomized clinical trial is designed to address this clinical question.\\n \\n \\n \\n The TESLA trial aim is to demonstrate the efficacy (3‐month and 1‐year disability following stroke) and safety of intraarterial mechanical thrombectomy in patients with large‐volume infarction assessed with a noncontrast computed tomography scan. The TESLA trial design is a prospective, randomized controlled, multicenter, open‐label, assessor‐blinded anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke trial with adaptive enrichment design, enrolling up to 300 patients. Patients with anterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion who meet the imaging and clinical eligibility criteria with a large‐core infarction on the basis of noncontrast computed tomography Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (2–5) adjudicated by a site investigator will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo intraarterial thrombectomy or best medical management up to 24 hours from last known well.\\n \\n \\n \\n The primary efficacy outcome is utility‐weighted modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score distribution at 90 days between the groups. The results will be based on an intention‐to‐treat analysis that will examine the Bayesian posterior probability that, adjusted for Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, patients with large‐core infarct volume treated with intra‐arterial thrombectomy have higher expected utility‐weighted mRS than those treated with best medical management alone. The primary safety outcome is the 90‐day death rate. Key secondary outcomes are dichotomized mRS 0 to 2 and 0 to 3 outcomes, ordinal mRS scores, and quality of life (EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level survey) at 90 days and 1 year, utility‐weighted mRS at 1 year, hemicraniectomy rate, and rate of 24‐hour symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in both groups.\\n \\n \\n \\n TESLA is a pragmatic trial, designed to address the unanswered question of the efficacy and safety of intra‐arterial thrombectomy in patients with large infarcts diagnosed by the site investigator only on noncontrast computed tomography scan secondary to anterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion up to 24 hours from stroke symptoms onset.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":74875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.122.000787\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.122.000787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

机械取栓术已被证明对继发于大血管闭塞和小到中等梗死面积的急性缺血性卒中患者有效。然而,在仅基于非对比计算机断层扫描脑扫描的人群中,没有随机临床试验来比较机械取栓和药物治疗对大核心梗死体积的影响。TESLA(急诊挽救大前循环缺血性卒中血栓切除术)随机临床试验旨在解决这一临床问题。特斯拉试验的目的是证明动脉内机械取栓对大容量梗死患者的有效性(卒中后3个月和1年残疾)和安全性,并通过非对比计算机断层扫描进行评估。TESLA试验设计是一项前瞻性、随机对照、多中心、开放标签、评估者盲法的前循环急性缺血性卒中试验,采用适应性富集设计,入组300例患者。前循环大血管闭塞的患者,在非对比计算机断层扫描(Alberta Stroke Program)早期CT评分(2-5)的基础上,符合影像学和临床大核心梗死的资格标准,由现场研究者判定,将按1:1的比例随机分配,接受动脉内血栓切除术或最佳医疗管理,时间最长为24小时。主要疗效指标为90天各组间效用加权修正兰金量表(mRS)评分分布。结果将基于意向治疗分析,该分析将检验贝叶斯后验概率,根据阿尔伯塔卒中计划早期CT评分进行调整,接受动脉内血栓切除术治疗的大核心梗死体积患者的预期效用加权mRS高于仅接受最佳医疗管理治疗的患者。主要的安全性指标是90天死亡率。主要的次要结局是两组患者90天和1年的平均mRS评分和生活质量(EuroQol 5维度5水平调查)、1年的效用加权mRS评分、半脑切除术率和24小时症状性颅内出血率。TESLA是一项实用的试验,旨在解决动脉内取栓术的有效性和安全性这一尚未解决的问题,即在中风症状出现后24小时内,仅通过非对比ct扫描诊断为前循环大血管闭塞的大面积梗死患者中,动脉内取栓术的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TESLA Trial: Rationale, Protocol, and Design
Mechanical thrombectomy has been shown to be effective in patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large‐vessel occlusion and small to moderate infarct volume. However, there are no randomized clinical trials for large‐core infarct volume comparing mechanical thrombectomy to medical therapy in the population selected based solely on noncontrast computed tomography brain scan. The TESLA (Thrombectomy for Emergent Salvage of Large Anterior Circulation Ischemic Stroke) randomized clinical trial is designed to address this clinical question. The TESLA trial aim is to demonstrate the efficacy (3‐month and 1‐year disability following stroke) and safety of intraarterial mechanical thrombectomy in patients with large‐volume infarction assessed with a noncontrast computed tomography scan. The TESLA trial design is a prospective, randomized controlled, multicenter, open‐label, assessor‐blinded anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke trial with adaptive enrichment design, enrolling up to 300 patients. Patients with anterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion who meet the imaging and clinical eligibility criteria with a large‐core infarction on the basis of noncontrast computed tomography Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (2–5) adjudicated by a site investigator will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo intraarterial thrombectomy or best medical management up to 24 hours from last known well. The primary efficacy outcome is utility‐weighted modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score distribution at 90 days between the groups. The results will be based on an intention‐to‐treat analysis that will examine the Bayesian posterior probability that, adjusted for Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, patients with large‐core infarct volume treated with intra‐arterial thrombectomy have higher expected utility‐weighted mRS than those treated with best medical management alone. The primary safety outcome is the 90‐day death rate. Key secondary outcomes are dichotomized mRS 0 to 2 and 0 to 3 outcomes, ordinal mRS scores, and quality of life (EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level survey) at 90 days and 1 year, utility‐weighted mRS at 1 year, hemicraniectomy rate, and rate of 24‐hour symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in both groups. TESLA is a pragmatic trial, designed to address the unanswered question of the efficacy and safety of intra‐arterial thrombectomy in patients with large infarcts diagnosed by the site investigator only on noncontrast computed tomography scan secondary to anterior circulation large‐vessel occlusion up to 24 hours from stroke symptoms onset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信