针对学龄前儿童蔬菜摄入量和喜好的家庭干预措施:一项系统综述

IF 0.1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY
M. Caputi, Daniela Bulgarelli, G. Cerrato, P. Molina
{"title":"针对学龄前儿童蔬菜摄入量和喜好的家庭干预措施:一项系统综述","authors":"M. Caputi, Daniela Bulgarelli, G. Cerrato, P. Molina","doi":"10.3280/rip2022oa13951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consumption of vegetables is low among preschoolers and does not meet WHO recommendations. We conducted a systematic review of home-based interventions aimed at increasing vegetable consumption and liking among preschoolers. The main aim was to synthesize existing studies and to identify relevant features of successful interventions, especially looking at those with long-lasting effects. A comprehensive search strategy was performed using Psychinfo, PsychArticles, Psyndex, Medline and ERIC databases. Articles published until February 2020, regarding evaluation of vegetable intake and/or liking following an intervention, were included. Fourteen articles were selected, encompassing seven intervention strategies: familiarization with vegetable, tasting of the vegetable, intake of the vegetable, reward, information to parents about healthy eating, how-to-do tips to parents to improve healthy eating, intervention tailored to the characteristics of the family. Successful interventions on vegetable intake did not present systematic similarities in terms of type of intervention, but were characterized by an intense intervention (high frequency/length ratio). Successful interventions on vegetable liking mainly included a small reward. Interestingly, the few studies including a long-term follow-up found persistent positive effects. Despite interesting and promising outcomes, the present review highlighted a number of methodological issues that limited the generalisability of findings. Such limitations are discussed, together with outlets for future directions concerning this research topic.","PeriodicalId":41732,"journal":{"name":"Ricerche di Psicologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home-based interventions targeting vegetable intake and liking among preschoolers: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"M. Caputi, Daniela Bulgarelli, G. Cerrato, P. Molina\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/rip2022oa13951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consumption of vegetables is low among preschoolers and does not meet WHO recommendations. We conducted a systematic review of home-based interventions aimed at increasing vegetable consumption and liking among preschoolers. The main aim was to synthesize existing studies and to identify relevant features of successful interventions, especially looking at those with long-lasting effects. A comprehensive search strategy was performed using Psychinfo, PsychArticles, Psyndex, Medline and ERIC databases. Articles published until February 2020, regarding evaluation of vegetable intake and/or liking following an intervention, were included. Fourteen articles were selected, encompassing seven intervention strategies: familiarization with vegetable, tasting of the vegetable, intake of the vegetable, reward, information to parents about healthy eating, how-to-do tips to parents to improve healthy eating, intervention tailored to the characteristics of the family. Successful interventions on vegetable intake did not present systematic similarities in terms of type of intervention, but were characterized by an intense intervention (high frequency/length ratio). Successful interventions on vegetable liking mainly included a small reward. Interestingly, the few studies including a long-term follow-up found persistent positive effects. Despite interesting and promising outcomes, the present review highlighted a number of methodological issues that limited the generalisability of findings. Such limitations are discussed, together with outlets for future directions concerning this research topic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ricerche di Psicologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ricerche di Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2022oa13951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ricerche di Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/rip2022oa13951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

学龄前儿童的蔬菜消费量较低,不符合世界卫生组织的建议。我们对旨在增加学龄前儿童蔬菜消费和喜爱程度的家庭干预措施进行了系统审查。主要目的是综合现有的研究,并确定成功干预措施的相关特征,特别是着眼于那些具有长期效果的干预措施。使用Psychinfo、PsychArticles、Psyndex、Medline和ERIC数据库进行了全面的搜索策略。包括截至2020年2月发表的关于干预后蔬菜摄入量和/或喜好评估的文章。选择了14篇文章,包括7种干预策略:熟悉蔬菜、品尝蔬菜、摄入蔬菜、奖励、向父母提供有关健康饮食的信息、如何向父母提供改善健康饮食的提示、针对家庭特点的干预。成功的蔬菜摄入干预措施在干预类型方面没有系统的相似性,但其特点是干预力度大(频率/长度比高)。对蔬菜喜好的成功干预主要包括少量奖励。有趣的是,包括长期随访在内的少数几项研究发现了持续的积极影响。尽管取得了令人感兴趣和有希望的结果,但本审查强调了一些方法学问题,这些问题限制了研究结果的普遍性。讨论了这些局限性,以及有关该研究主题的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Home-based interventions targeting vegetable intake and liking among preschoolers: A systematic review
Consumption of vegetables is low among preschoolers and does not meet WHO recommendations. We conducted a systematic review of home-based interventions aimed at increasing vegetable consumption and liking among preschoolers. The main aim was to synthesize existing studies and to identify relevant features of successful interventions, especially looking at those with long-lasting effects. A comprehensive search strategy was performed using Psychinfo, PsychArticles, Psyndex, Medline and ERIC databases. Articles published until February 2020, regarding evaluation of vegetable intake and/or liking following an intervention, were included. Fourteen articles were selected, encompassing seven intervention strategies: familiarization with vegetable, tasting of the vegetable, intake of the vegetable, reward, information to parents about healthy eating, how-to-do tips to parents to improve healthy eating, intervention tailored to the characteristics of the family. Successful interventions on vegetable intake did not present systematic similarities in terms of type of intervention, but were characterized by an intense intervention (high frequency/length ratio). Successful interventions on vegetable liking mainly included a small reward. Interestingly, the few studies including a long-term follow-up found persistent positive effects. Despite interesting and promising outcomes, the present review highlighted a number of methodological issues that limited the generalisability of findings. Such limitations are discussed, together with outlets for future directions concerning this research topic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Ricerche di psicologia(Psychology Research) is a scientific journal - addressed primarily to the community of Italian psychologists, both academic and professional - which tackles all psychological issues. Each issue contains a series of papers on the most salient and up-to-date themes of contemporary psychological research. Ricerche di psicologia focuses particular attention on: general, cognitive and experimental psychology; history of psychology; physiological psychology, neuropsychology and psychobiology; comparative and animal psychology; psychometrics and psychological research methodology, developmental and educational psychology; social psychology; work and organizational psychology; dynamic psychology; clinical psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信