{"title":"新加坡。《失去新加坡的人,1938-1942》罗纳德·麦克鲁姆著新加坡:新加坡国立大学出版社,2017年。240页。地图,图像,参考书目,索引。","authors":"K. Hack","doi":"10.1017/S002246342200073X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"each. Further, many of the same arguments presented in the book about the limitations of coping strategies are found in the complementary, critical literature on sustainable livelihoods. Second, at times, it wasn’t clear that the evidence presented in the study provided sufficient warrant for some of the claims made. I refer to claims that the quality of life in rural Burma is worsening (p. 37), that democratic processes create conditions favourable to economic development (p. 17), that small-scale informal activity does not fuel economic growth (p. 180), and so on. These quibbles do not detract from the core contributions of this monograph, however. Further and sadly, there can be no quibble with the book’s ominously prescient concluding remarks: ‘Because many of the forces at work in the country run counter to democratic norms and nurture conditions favourable to the return of the military rule, ... there can be no guarantee that substantive democratic outcomes will emerge in Myanmar’ (p. 202).","PeriodicalId":46213,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southeast Asian Studies","volume":"53 1","pages":"829 - 831"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Singapore. The men who lost Singapore, 1938–1942 By Ronald McCrum Singapore: National University of Singapore Press, 2017. Pp. 240. Maps, Images, Bibliography, Index.\",\"authors\":\"K. Hack\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S002246342200073X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"each. Further, many of the same arguments presented in the book about the limitations of coping strategies are found in the complementary, critical literature on sustainable livelihoods. Second, at times, it wasn’t clear that the evidence presented in the study provided sufficient warrant for some of the claims made. I refer to claims that the quality of life in rural Burma is worsening (p. 37), that democratic processes create conditions favourable to economic development (p. 17), that small-scale informal activity does not fuel economic growth (p. 180), and so on. These quibbles do not detract from the core contributions of this monograph, however. Further and sadly, there can be no quibble with the book’s ominously prescient concluding remarks: ‘Because many of the forces at work in the country run counter to democratic norms and nurture conditions favourable to the return of the military rule, ... there can be no guarantee that substantive democratic outcomes will emerge in Myanmar’ (p. 202).\",\"PeriodicalId\":46213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Southeast Asian Studies\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"829 - 831\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Southeast Asian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S002246342200073X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southeast Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S002246342200073X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Singapore. The men who lost Singapore, 1938–1942 By Ronald McCrum Singapore: National University of Singapore Press, 2017. Pp. 240. Maps, Images, Bibliography, Index.
each. Further, many of the same arguments presented in the book about the limitations of coping strategies are found in the complementary, critical literature on sustainable livelihoods. Second, at times, it wasn’t clear that the evidence presented in the study provided sufficient warrant for some of the claims made. I refer to claims that the quality of life in rural Burma is worsening (p. 37), that democratic processes create conditions favourable to economic development (p. 17), that small-scale informal activity does not fuel economic growth (p. 180), and so on. These quibbles do not detract from the core contributions of this monograph, however. Further and sadly, there can be no quibble with the book’s ominously prescient concluding remarks: ‘Because many of the forces at work in the country run counter to democratic norms and nurture conditions favourable to the return of the military rule, ... there can be no guarantee that substantive democratic outcomes will emerge in Myanmar’ (p. 202).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Southeast Asian Studies is one of the principal outlets for scholarly articles on Southeast Asia (Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, East Timor, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam). Embracing a wide range of academic disciplines in the humanities and social sciences, the journal publishes manuscripts oriented toward a scholarly readership but written to be accessible to non-specialists. The extensive book review section includes works in Southeast Asian languages. Published for the History Department, National University of Singapore.