格鲁吉亚手语中的否定-时态互动

IF 0.4 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Sign Language & Linguistics Pub Date : 2018-10-19 DOI:10.1075/SLL.00013.MAK

Tamar Makharoblidze, R. Pfau

{"title":"格鲁吉亚手语中的否定-时态互动","authors":"Tamar Makharoblidze, R. Pfau","doi":"10.1075/SLL.00013.MAK","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We describe an intriguing interaction of negation and tense in Georgian Sign Language (GESL), a sign language which to date has\n received close to no attention by linguists. GESL verbs that employ an irregular negation strategy in the present tense (modal\n verbs and the verb know) require double marking in the past tense, i.e. the irregular negative form combines with the\n negative particle not, which is not used in the present and future tense with these verbs. The GESL data thus provide us with direct\n evidence for an active contribution of the feature tense in the grammar of GESL – in contrast to most other sign languages\n previously studied. We also offer a cross-linguistic perspective on the data by discussing instances of Negative Concord reported\n for various sign languages as well as tense-negation interactions attested in spoken languages.","PeriodicalId":43398,"journal":{"name":"Sign Language & Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A negation-tense interaction in Georgian Sign Language\",\"authors\":\"Tamar Makharoblidze, R. Pfau\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/SLL.00013.MAK\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We describe an intriguing interaction of negation and tense in Georgian Sign Language (GESL), a sign language which to date has\\n received close to no attention by linguists. GESL verbs that employ an irregular negation strategy in the present tense (modal\\n verbs and the verb know) require double marking in the past tense, i.e. the irregular negative form combines with the\\n negative particle not, which is not used in the present and future tense with these verbs. The GESL data thus provide us with direct\\n evidence for an active contribution of the feature tense in the grammar of GESL – in contrast to most other sign languages\\n previously studied. We also offer a cross-linguistic perspective on the data by discussing instances of Negative Concord reported\\n for various sign languages as well as tense-negation interactions attested in spoken languages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sign Language & Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sign Language & Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/SLL.00013.MAK\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sign Language & Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/SLL.00013.MAK","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

我们描述了格鲁吉亚手语（GESL）中否定和时态的有趣互动，这是一种迄今为止几乎没有受到语言学家关注的手语。在现在时使用不规则否定策略的GESL动词（语气动词和动词know）需要在过去时中进行双重标记，即不规则否定形式与否定助词not结合，后者不与这些动词一起用于现在时和将来时。因此，与之前研究的大多数其他手语相比，GESL数据为特征时态在GESL语法中的积极贡献提供了直接证据。我们还通过讨论各种手语中报道的否定和谐的例子以及口语中证实的时态否定相互作用，对数据提供了一个跨语言的视角。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A negation-tense interaction in Georgian Sign Language

We describe an intriguing interaction of negation and tense in Georgian Sign Language (GESL), a sign language which to date has received close to no attention by linguists. GESL verbs that employ an irregular negation strategy in the present tense (modal verbs and the verb know) require double marking in the past tense, i.e. the irregular negative form combines with the negative particle not, which is not used in the present and future tense with these verbs. The GESL data thus provide us with direct evidence for an active contribution of the feature tense in the grammar of GESL – in contrast to most other sign languages previously studied. We also offer a cross-linguistic perspective on the data by discussing instances of Negative Concord reported for various sign languages as well as tense-negation interactions attested in spoken languages.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Sign Language & Linguistics Multiple-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Sign Language & Linguistics is a peer-reviewed, international journal which aims to increase our understanding of language by providing an academic forum for researchers to discuss sign languages in the larger context of natural language, crosslinguistically and crossmodally. SLL presents studies that apply existing theoretical insights to sign language in order to further our understanding of SL; it investigates and expands our knowledge of grammar based on the study of SL and it specifically addresses the effect of modality (signed vs. spoken) on the structure of grammar.