用Kastolan误差分析法分析学生在解决基本对数问题中的误差

Yodiatmana Yodiatmana, K. Kartini
{"title":"用Kastolan误差分析法分析学生在解决基本对数问题中的误差","authors":"Yodiatmana Yodiatmana, K. Kartini","doi":"10.31629/jg.v7i2.4689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to describe the types of student errors in solving logarithmic problems. The subjects in this study were class X students of SMAN 15 Pekanbaru City, Riau Province. The research method uses a qualitative descriptive approach. Data collection techniques using written tests and documentation. Data analysis used descriptive qualitative analysis by compiling various kinds of student error data as material for research. In this analysis, the types of student errors are categorized based on Kastolan stages. Based on the results of the study, there are still many students who need help solving logarithmic problems. The most errors were conceptual errors at 74.14%, followed by procedural errors at 15.52%, and types of errors with the least technical errors at 10.34%. Conceptual errors indicate a weak understanding of the properties of logarithms, so they cannot apply them. The second type of procedural error occurs due to unsystematic settlement and exit from a predetermined procedure. The kind of error with the lowest percentage is a technique that shows the accuracy of students' calculations in solving problems. This happens because of a need for more thoroughness with the signs that must be used.","PeriodicalId":32098,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Gantang","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Basic Logarithmic Problems Using Kastolan Error Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yodiatmana Yodiatmana, K. Kartini\",\"doi\":\"10.31629/jg.v7i2.4689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to describe the types of student errors in solving logarithmic problems. The subjects in this study were class X students of SMAN 15 Pekanbaru City, Riau Province. The research method uses a qualitative descriptive approach. Data collection techniques using written tests and documentation. Data analysis used descriptive qualitative analysis by compiling various kinds of student error data as material for research. In this analysis, the types of student errors are categorized based on Kastolan stages. Based on the results of the study, there are still many students who need help solving logarithmic problems. The most errors were conceptual errors at 74.14%, followed by procedural errors at 15.52%, and types of errors with the least technical errors at 10.34%. Conceptual errors indicate a weak understanding of the properties of logarithms, so they cannot apply them. The second type of procedural error occurs due to unsystematic settlement and exit from a predetermined procedure. The kind of error with the lowest percentage is a technique that shows the accuracy of students' calculations in solving problems. This happens because of a need for more thoroughness with the signs that must be used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Gantang\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Gantang\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v7i2.4689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Gantang","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v7i2.4689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在描述学生在解决对数问题时的错误类型。本研究的对象为廖内省北干巴鲁市SMAN 15的X班学生。研究方法采用定性描述方法。使用书面测试和文档的数据收集技术。数据分析采用描述性定性分析,通过汇编各种学生错误数据作为研究材料。在这个分析中,学生的错误类型是根据卡斯托兰阶段进行分类的。根据研究结果,仍然有许多学生需要帮助解决对数问题。错误最多的是概念错误,占74.14%,其次是程序错误,占15.52%,技术错误最少的错误类型占10.34%。概念上的错误表明他们对对数的性质理解不足,所以他们不能应用对数。第二类程序性错误是由于非系统结算和退出预定程序而发生的。错误百分比最低的是一种技术,它显示了学生在解决问题时计算的准确性。这是因为必须使用的标志需要更彻底。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Basic Logarithmic Problems Using Kastolan Error Analysis
This research aims to describe the types of student errors in solving logarithmic problems. The subjects in this study were class X students of SMAN 15 Pekanbaru City, Riau Province. The research method uses a qualitative descriptive approach. Data collection techniques using written tests and documentation. Data analysis used descriptive qualitative analysis by compiling various kinds of student error data as material for research. In this analysis, the types of student errors are categorized based on Kastolan stages. Based on the results of the study, there are still many students who need help solving logarithmic problems. The most errors were conceptual errors at 74.14%, followed by procedural errors at 15.52%, and types of errors with the least technical errors at 10.34%. Conceptual errors indicate a weak understanding of the properties of logarithms, so they cannot apply them. The second type of procedural error occurs due to unsystematic settlement and exit from a predetermined procedure. The kind of error with the lowest percentage is a technique that shows the accuracy of students' calculations in solving problems. This happens because of a need for more thoroughness with the signs that must be used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信