混沌播种和多重扰动在华南对流集合预报中的作用

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Jingzhuo Wang, Jing Chen, Hongqi Li, Haile Xue, Zhizhen Xu
{"title":"混沌播种和多重扰动在华南对流集合预报中的作用","authors":"Jingzhuo Wang, Jing Chen, Hongqi Li, Haile Xue, Zhizhen Xu","doi":"10.1175/waf-d-22-0177.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe roles of chaos seeding and multiple perturbations, including model perturbations and topographic perturbations, in convection-permitting ensemble forecasting, are assessed. Six comparison experiments were conducted for fourteen heavy rainfall events over southern China. Chaos seeding was run as a benchmark experiment to compare their effects to the intended perturbations. The results first reveal the chaos seeding phenomenon. That is, the tiny and local perturbations of the skin soil moisture propagate into the whole analysis domain within an hour and expand to every prognostic variables, and the perturbations derived from chaos seeding develop when moist convection is active. Secondly, the chaos seeding has the statistically significant differences from our intended perturbations for the ensemble spread magnitudes of precipitation and the spread-skill relationships and probabilistic forecast skills of dynamical variables. Additionally, for the probabilistic forecasts of precipitation, initial and lateral boundary perturbations and model perturbations can yield statistically larger FSS and AROC scores than chaos seeding; topographic perturbations can only improve FSS and AROC scores a little. The different performances may be related to the different degrees of the real dynamical influence of our intended perturbations. Finally, model perturbations can increase the ensemble spreads of precipitation, and improve FSS and AROC scores of precipitation and the consistency of middle- and low-level dynamical variables. However, the effects of topographic perturbations are small.","PeriodicalId":49369,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Forecasting","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The roles of chaos seeding and multiple perturbations in convection–permitting ensemble forecasting over southern China\",\"authors\":\"Jingzhuo Wang, Jing Chen, Hongqi Li, Haile Xue, Zhizhen Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/waf-d-22-0177.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe roles of chaos seeding and multiple perturbations, including model perturbations and topographic perturbations, in convection-permitting ensemble forecasting, are assessed. Six comparison experiments were conducted for fourteen heavy rainfall events over southern China. Chaos seeding was run as a benchmark experiment to compare their effects to the intended perturbations. The results first reveal the chaos seeding phenomenon. That is, the tiny and local perturbations of the skin soil moisture propagate into the whole analysis domain within an hour and expand to every prognostic variables, and the perturbations derived from chaos seeding develop when moist convection is active. Secondly, the chaos seeding has the statistically significant differences from our intended perturbations for the ensemble spread magnitudes of precipitation and the spread-skill relationships and probabilistic forecast skills of dynamical variables. Additionally, for the probabilistic forecasts of precipitation, initial and lateral boundary perturbations and model perturbations can yield statistically larger FSS and AROC scores than chaos seeding; topographic perturbations can only improve FSS and AROC scores a little. The different performances may be related to the different degrees of the real dynamical influence of our intended perturbations. Finally, model perturbations can increase the ensemble spreads of precipitation, and improve FSS and AROC scores of precipitation and the consistency of middle- and low-level dynamical variables. However, the effects of topographic perturbations are small.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Weather and Forecasting\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Weather and Forecasting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-22-0177.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-22-0177.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

评估了混沌播种和多重扰动(包括模式扰动和地形扰动)在允许对流的集合预报中的作用。对中国南方14次强降雨事件进行了6次对比试验。混沌播种作为基准实验,将其效果与预期扰动进行比较。结果首次揭示了混沌播种现象。即表层土壤湿度的微小局部扰动在1小时内传播到整个分析域并扩展到每一个预测变量,混沌播种引起的扰动在湿对流活跃时产生。其次,混沌播种对降水的总体扩散强度、动力变量的扩散技能关系和概率预测技能与预期扰动具有统计学上的显著差异。此外,对于降水的概率预报,初始和横向边界扰动和模式扰动比混沌播种产生更大的FSS和AROC分数;地形扰动只能略微提高FSS和AROC分数。不同的性能可能与我们预期扰动的实际动态影响的不同程度有关。最后,模式扰动增加了降水的集合扩展,提高了降水的FSS和AROC分数以及中低层动力变量的一致性。然而,地形扰动的影响很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The roles of chaos seeding and multiple perturbations in convection–permitting ensemble forecasting over southern China
The roles of chaos seeding and multiple perturbations, including model perturbations and topographic perturbations, in convection-permitting ensemble forecasting, are assessed. Six comparison experiments were conducted for fourteen heavy rainfall events over southern China. Chaos seeding was run as a benchmark experiment to compare their effects to the intended perturbations. The results first reveal the chaos seeding phenomenon. That is, the tiny and local perturbations of the skin soil moisture propagate into the whole analysis domain within an hour and expand to every prognostic variables, and the perturbations derived from chaos seeding develop when moist convection is active. Secondly, the chaos seeding has the statistically significant differences from our intended perturbations for the ensemble spread magnitudes of precipitation and the spread-skill relationships and probabilistic forecast skills of dynamical variables. Additionally, for the probabilistic forecasts of precipitation, initial and lateral boundary perturbations and model perturbations can yield statistically larger FSS and AROC scores than chaos seeding; topographic perturbations can only improve FSS and AROC scores a little. The different performances may be related to the different degrees of the real dynamical influence of our intended perturbations. Finally, model perturbations can increase the ensemble spreads of precipitation, and improve FSS and AROC scores of precipitation and the consistency of middle- and low-level dynamical variables. However, the effects of topographic perturbations are small.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Weather and Forecasting
Weather and Forecasting 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
17.20%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Weather and Forecasting (WAF) (ISSN: 0882-8156; eISSN: 1520-0434) publishes research that is relevant to operational forecasting. This includes papers on significant weather events, forecasting techniques, forecast verification, model parameterizations, data assimilation, model ensembles, statistical postprocessing techniques, the transfer of research results to the forecasting community, and the societal use and value of forecasts. The scope of WAF includes research relevant to forecast lead times ranging from short-term “nowcasts” through seasonal time scales out to approximately two years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信