普京入侵乌克兰的历史背景

IF 0.3 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Hakamada Shigeki
{"title":"普京入侵乌克兰的历史背景","authors":"Hakamada Shigeki","doi":"10.1080/13439006.2022.2105516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The February 2022 military invasion of Ukraine by President Vladimir Putin, which overturned the very foundations of the world order, was not the result of a recent change in Putin’s thinking or personality; rather it was the inevitable outcome of the Russian policy of imperialism ongoing since the early 2000s. The assertions of former reformist leaders who ingratiated themselves to Putin after 2003, such as Anatoly Chubais, are accurate predictions of Putin’s behavior today. In particular, the Putin administration’s policy shift in June 2006 from an emphasis on “territorial integrity” to an emphasis on the “right to self-determination” is the basis for the subsequent war in Georgia, the annexation of Crimea, and today’s Ukraine problem. The West and Japan did not realize the seriousness of the policy shift in 2006 and continued their policy of appeasement toward Russia, resulting in the current situation. There will be no radical change in Russia after Putin.","PeriodicalId":43120,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"19 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historical Background of Putin’s Invasion of Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"Hakamada Shigeki\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13439006.2022.2105516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The February 2022 military invasion of Ukraine by President Vladimir Putin, which overturned the very foundations of the world order, was not the result of a recent change in Putin’s thinking or personality; rather it was the inevitable outcome of the Russian policy of imperialism ongoing since the early 2000s. The assertions of former reformist leaders who ingratiated themselves to Putin after 2003, such as Anatoly Chubais, are accurate predictions of Putin’s behavior today. In particular, the Putin administration’s policy shift in June 2006 from an emphasis on “territorial integrity” to an emphasis on the “right to self-determination” is the basis for the subsequent war in Georgia, the annexation of Crimea, and today’s Ukraine problem. The West and Japan did not realize the seriousness of the policy shift in 2006 and continued their policy of appeasement toward Russia, resulting in the current situation. There will be no radical change in Russia after Putin.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Review\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"19 - 34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13439006.2022.2105516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13439006.2022.2105516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022年2月,弗拉基米尔·普京总统对乌克兰的军事入侵推翻了世界秩序的基础,这并不是普京思想或个性最近发生变化的结果;相反,这是21世纪初以来俄罗斯帝国主义政策的必然结果。2003年后讨好普京的前改革派领导人,如阿纳托利·丘拜斯的断言,是对普京今天行为的准确预测。特别是,2006年6月,普京政府的政策从强调“领土完整”转向强调“自决权”,这是随后格鲁吉亚战争、吞并克里米亚和今天乌克兰问题的基础。西方和日本没有意识到2006年政策转变的严重性,继续对俄罗斯采取绥靖政策,导致了目前的局面。普京之后,俄罗斯不会发生根本性的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Historical Background of Putin’s Invasion of Ukraine
The February 2022 military invasion of Ukraine by President Vladimir Putin, which overturned the very foundations of the world order, was not the result of a recent change in Putin’s thinking or personality; rather it was the inevitable outcome of the Russian policy of imperialism ongoing since the early 2000s. The assertions of former reformist leaders who ingratiated themselves to Putin after 2003, such as Anatoly Chubais, are accurate predictions of Putin’s behavior today. In particular, the Putin administration’s policy shift in June 2006 from an emphasis on “territorial integrity” to an emphasis on the “right to self-determination” is the basis for the subsequent war in Georgia, the annexation of Crimea, and today’s Ukraine problem. The West and Japan did not realize the seriousness of the policy shift in 2006 and continued their policy of appeasement toward Russia, resulting in the current situation. There will be no radical change in Russia after Putin.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Review
Asia-Pacific Review INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信