{"title":"历史小说与假新闻时代","authors":"Kristal Bivona","doi":"10.3368/lbr.57.1.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What is at stake when visual production represents unresolved past histories? The recent debate over José Padilha’s series about the Lava Jato corruption scandal, O mecanismo (2018), raised questions about the responsibility of producers of historical fiction to represent the past accurately. The polemics regarding Padilha’s Netflix series echo the controversy surrounding Bruno Barreto’s film, O que é isso, companheiro? (1997), which was attacked for its portrayal of the military dictatorship and the armed struggle. Both represent histories that are highly contested as divergent versions of the past compete for dominance in the collective imaginary. Ann Rigney’s work on cultural remembrance offers a framework for thinking through the implications of historical fiction. This paper argues that the significance of these works to cultural memory lies in the debates they incite rather than how they portray the past.","PeriodicalId":52041,"journal":{"name":"Luso-Brazilian Review","volume":"57 1","pages":"100 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3368/lbr.57.1.77","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historical Fiction and the Age of Fake News\",\"authors\":\"Kristal Bivona\",\"doi\":\"10.3368/lbr.57.1.77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What is at stake when visual production represents unresolved past histories? The recent debate over José Padilha’s series about the Lava Jato corruption scandal, O mecanismo (2018), raised questions about the responsibility of producers of historical fiction to represent the past accurately. The polemics regarding Padilha’s Netflix series echo the controversy surrounding Bruno Barreto’s film, O que é isso, companheiro? (1997), which was attacked for its portrayal of the military dictatorship and the armed struggle. Both represent histories that are highly contested as divergent versions of the past compete for dominance in the collective imaginary. Ann Rigney’s work on cultural remembrance offers a framework for thinking through the implications of historical fiction. This paper argues that the significance of these works to cultural memory lies in the debates they incite rather than how they portray the past.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Luso-Brazilian Review\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"100 - 77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3368/lbr.57.1.77\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Luso-Brazilian Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3368/lbr.57.1.77\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Luso-Brazilian Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/lbr.57.1.77","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
当视觉制作代表未解决的过去历史时,什么是危险的?最近,围绕jos Padilha关于Lava Jato腐败丑闻的系列作品《O mecanismo》(2018)的争论,引发了人们对历史小说制片人是否有责任准确再现过去的质疑。关于帕迪利亚在Netflix上的这部剧的争论,与布鲁诺·巴雷托(Bruno Barreto)的电影《你是谁?》(O que isso, companheiro?)(1997),该书因其对军事独裁和武装斗争的描绘而受到攻击。两者都代表了高度争议的历史,因为不同版本的过去在集体想象中争夺主导地位。安·里格尼关于文化记忆的研究为思考历史小说的含义提供了一个框架。本文认为,这些作品对文化记忆的意义在于它们所引发的争论,而不是它们如何描绘过去。
What is at stake when visual production represents unresolved past histories? The recent debate over José Padilha’s series about the Lava Jato corruption scandal, O mecanismo (2018), raised questions about the responsibility of producers of historical fiction to represent the past accurately. The polemics regarding Padilha’s Netflix series echo the controversy surrounding Bruno Barreto’s film, O que é isso, companheiro? (1997), which was attacked for its portrayal of the military dictatorship and the armed struggle. Both represent histories that are highly contested as divergent versions of the past compete for dominance in the collective imaginary. Ann Rigney’s work on cultural remembrance offers a framework for thinking through the implications of historical fiction. This paper argues that the significance of these works to cultural memory lies in the debates they incite rather than how they portray the past.
期刊介绍:
Luso-Brazilian Review publishes interdisciplinary scholarship on Portuguese, Brazilian, and Lusophone African cultures, with special emphasis on scholarly works in literature, history, and the social sciences. Each issue of the Luso-Brazilian Review includes articles and book reviews, which may be written in either English or Portuguese.