树木生态学:原理与实践

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY
R. D. Manzanedo
{"title":"树木生态学:原理与实践","authors":"R. D. Manzanedo","doi":"10.3959/TRR2020-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dendroecology: Principles and Practice by Richard Phipps and Thomas Yanosky was published in 2020 by J. Ross Publishing (ISBN 978-160427-145-4) and is available directly by the publisher and throughmultiple on-line bookstores. The book is based on the extensive dendrochronological experience of both authors, who have pioneered some of the early advances of the field, particularly regarding hydrological studies and reconstructions and the use of basal area increments (BAI) to better estimate and compare tree growth. The text introduces the reader to the origins and early ideas of dendroecology. Following examples and anecdotes, the authors describe multiple environmental drivers that can be explored using classic tree-ring methods. The book is easy to read and enjoyable, and the career-long passion of the authors for the topic is contagious. The text is divided in eight chapters, starting with an introduction to dendrochronological history and the basics of ring formation. It then addresses some of the more practical issues in classical dendrochronological sampling, including collection, measurement, and crossdating. In the remaining five chapters, examples are provided on how to apply these techniques. The last chapter also presents and discusses changes in growth trends in a large collection of 47 white oak sites in North America, collected between 1977 and 1992 by multiple authors as the most in-depth analysis. The book will be very useful for readers wanting to have a first overview of the discipline and for those interested in the discipline’s foundation stones, the base for much dendroecology of the last few decades. Analyses will feel familiar for those coming from dendroclimatology. This book may serve many as a steppingstone into the field, which can be complemented with other collections of recent advances in dendroecology, such as Amoroso (2017), which draws on a great diversity of authors to summarize and discuss the future of dendroecology for a range of subdisciplines and processes. It is, however, remarkable that, despite large advances in methods and theory, dendroecology still lacks a central textbook in the way that Fritts (1976) or Schweingruber (1987) have been for dendroclimatology. I particularly enjoyed the detailed descriptions of study sites and small data collections by the authors, and the careful interpretation of the results. The authors go above and beyond to consider alternative hypotheses to their data and to stress the need for further understanding of the deceptively simple question of how trees grow. It is great to see such care and humbleness, which the early dendroecologists had in abundance and that we should make sure to continue preserving as the discipline advances. The description of the development and use of BAI is very interesting, and it left me thinking there is still more to explore and develop theoretically using that very simple model of tree growth. Using BAI trajectories’ slope to assess ecosystem development and site quality is very thought-provoking and not something I have seen further developed in other works, classic or recent. However, although the book does a great job in describing the origin and reasoning behind the traditional methods and metrics, the discussion of recent approaches and theory is most definitively weaker. Much of the dendroecological work done in the last 30 years is not really acknowledged in the text, and the vast majority of data and references presented precede the 1990s. This can be","PeriodicalId":54416,"journal":{"name":"Tree-Ring Research","volume":"76 1","pages":"102 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dendroecology: Principles and Practice\",\"authors\":\"R. D. Manzanedo\",\"doi\":\"10.3959/TRR2020-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dendroecology: Principles and Practice by Richard Phipps and Thomas Yanosky was published in 2020 by J. Ross Publishing (ISBN 978-160427-145-4) and is available directly by the publisher and throughmultiple on-line bookstores. The book is based on the extensive dendrochronological experience of both authors, who have pioneered some of the early advances of the field, particularly regarding hydrological studies and reconstructions and the use of basal area increments (BAI) to better estimate and compare tree growth. The text introduces the reader to the origins and early ideas of dendroecology. Following examples and anecdotes, the authors describe multiple environmental drivers that can be explored using classic tree-ring methods. The book is easy to read and enjoyable, and the career-long passion of the authors for the topic is contagious. The text is divided in eight chapters, starting with an introduction to dendrochronological history and the basics of ring formation. It then addresses some of the more practical issues in classical dendrochronological sampling, including collection, measurement, and crossdating. In the remaining five chapters, examples are provided on how to apply these techniques. The last chapter also presents and discusses changes in growth trends in a large collection of 47 white oak sites in North America, collected between 1977 and 1992 by multiple authors as the most in-depth analysis. The book will be very useful for readers wanting to have a first overview of the discipline and for those interested in the discipline’s foundation stones, the base for much dendroecology of the last few decades. Analyses will feel familiar for those coming from dendroclimatology. This book may serve many as a steppingstone into the field, which can be complemented with other collections of recent advances in dendroecology, such as Amoroso (2017), which draws on a great diversity of authors to summarize and discuss the future of dendroecology for a range of subdisciplines and processes. It is, however, remarkable that, despite large advances in methods and theory, dendroecology still lacks a central textbook in the way that Fritts (1976) or Schweingruber (1987) have been for dendroclimatology. I particularly enjoyed the detailed descriptions of study sites and small data collections by the authors, and the careful interpretation of the results. The authors go above and beyond to consider alternative hypotheses to their data and to stress the need for further understanding of the deceptively simple question of how trees grow. It is great to see such care and humbleness, which the early dendroecologists had in abundance and that we should make sure to continue preserving as the discipline advances. The description of the development and use of BAI is very interesting, and it left me thinking there is still more to explore and develop theoretically using that very simple model of tree growth. Using BAI trajectories’ slope to assess ecosystem development and site quality is very thought-provoking and not something I have seen further developed in other works, classic or recent. However, although the book does a great job in describing the origin and reasoning behind the traditional methods and metrics, the discussion of recent approaches and theory is most definitively weaker. Much of the dendroecological work done in the last 30 years is not really acknowledged in the text, and the vast majority of data and references presented precede the 1990s. This can be\",\"PeriodicalId\":54416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tree-Ring Research\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"102 - 103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tree-Ring Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3959/TRR2020-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree-Ring Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3959/TRR2020-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理查德·菲普斯和托马斯·雅诺斯基的《树木生态学:原则与实践》于2020年由J.罗斯出版社出版(ISBN 978-160427-145-4),可直接由出版商和多个在线书店获得。这本书是基于两位作者的广泛的树木年代学经验,他们开创了该领域的一些早期进展,特别是关于水文研究和重建以及使用基础面积增量(BAI)来更好地估计和比较树木生长。这篇文章向读者介绍了树木生态学的起源和早期思想。以下是一些例子和轶事,作者描述了可以使用经典的树轮方法来探索的多种环境驱动因素。这本书很容易读,很有趣,作者对这个话题的职业生涯的热情是有感染力的。正文分为八章,首先介绍树木年代史和基本的环形成。然后,它解决了一些更实际的问题,在经典的树木年代学采样,包括收集,测量和交叉年代。在剩下的五章中,提供了如何应用这些技术的示例。最后一章还介绍并讨论了1977年至1992年间由多位作者收集的北美47个白橡木地点的生长趋势变化,这是最深入的分析。这本书将是非常有用的读者想要有一个学科的第一个概述,并为那些感兴趣的学科的基石,基础上的许多树木生态学的过去几十年。对那些学过树木气候学的人来说,这些分析很熟悉。这本书可以作为许多人进入该领域的踏脚石,可以与其他树木生态学最新进展的集合相补充,例如Amoroso(2017),它利用了大量不同的作者来总结和讨论树木生态学在一系列子学科和过程中的未来。然而,值得注意的是,尽管在方法和理论方面取得了巨大的进步,但树木生态学仍然缺乏像弗里茨(1976)或施温格鲁伯(1987)为树木气候学所做的那样的中心教科书。我特别喜欢作者对研究地点的详细描述和小数据收集,以及对结果的仔细解释。作者不仅考虑了他们的数据的其他假设,还强调了进一步理解树木如何生长这个看似简单的问题的必要性。早期的树木生态学家有很多这样的细心和谦逊,我们应该确保随着这门学科的发展继续保持这种细心和谦逊,这真是太好了。关于BAI的发展和使用的描述非常有趣,它让我想到,使用非常简单的树木生长模型,还有更多的理论探索和发展。使用BAI轨迹的斜率来评估生态系统的发展和场地质量是非常发人深省的,我在其他作品中没有看到进一步的发展,无论是经典的还是最近的。然而,尽管这本书在描述传统方法和度量背后的起源和推理方面做得很好,但对最近的方法和理论的讨论却明显较弱。在过去30年里所做的许多树木生态学工作并没有真正在文本中得到承认,而且绝大多数数据和参考文献都是在20世纪90年代之前提出的。这可以是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dendroecology: Principles and Practice
Dendroecology: Principles and Practice by Richard Phipps and Thomas Yanosky was published in 2020 by J. Ross Publishing (ISBN 978-160427-145-4) and is available directly by the publisher and throughmultiple on-line bookstores. The book is based on the extensive dendrochronological experience of both authors, who have pioneered some of the early advances of the field, particularly regarding hydrological studies and reconstructions and the use of basal area increments (BAI) to better estimate and compare tree growth. The text introduces the reader to the origins and early ideas of dendroecology. Following examples and anecdotes, the authors describe multiple environmental drivers that can be explored using classic tree-ring methods. The book is easy to read and enjoyable, and the career-long passion of the authors for the topic is contagious. The text is divided in eight chapters, starting with an introduction to dendrochronological history and the basics of ring formation. It then addresses some of the more practical issues in classical dendrochronological sampling, including collection, measurement, and crossdating. In the remaining five chapters, examples are provided on how to apply these techniques. The last chapter also presents and discusses changes in growth trends in a large collection of 47 white oak sites in North America, collected between 1977 and 1992 by multiple authors as the most in-depth analysis. The book will be very useful for readers wanting to have a first overview of the discipline and for those interested in the discipline’s foundation stones, the base for much dendroecology of the last few decades. Analyses will feel familiar for those coming from dendroclimatology. This book may serve many as a steppingstone into the field, which can be complemented with other collections of recent advances in dendroecology, such as Amoroso (2017), which draws on a great diversity of authors to summarize and discuss the future of dendroecology for a range of subdisciplines and processes. It is, however, remarkable that, despite large advances in methods and theory, dendroecology still lacks a central textbook in the way that Fritts (1976) or Schweingruber (1987) have been for dendroclimatology. I particularly enjoyed the detailed descriptions of study sites and small data collections by the authors, and the careful interpretation of the results. The authors go above and beyond to consider alternative hypotheses to their data and to stress the need for further understanding of the deceptively simple question of how trees grow. It is great to see such care and humbleness, which the early dendroecologists had in abundance and that we should make sure to continue preserving as the discipline advances. The description of the development and use of BAI is very interesting, and it left me thinking there is still more to explore and develop theoretically using that very simple model of tree growth. Using BAI trajectories’ slope to assess ecosystem development and site quality is very thought-provoking and not something I have seen further developed in other works, classic or recent. However, although the book does a great job in describing the origin and reasoning behind the traditional methods and metrics, the discussion of recent approaches and theory is most definitively weaker. Much of the dendroecological work done in the last 30 years is not really acknowledged in the text, and the vast majority of data and references presented precede the 1990s. This can be
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tree-Ring Research
Tree-Ring Research 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Tree-Ring Research (TRR) is devoted to papers dealing with the growth rings of trees and the applications of tree-ring research in a wide variety of fields, including but not limited to archaeology, geology, ecology, hydrology, climatology, forestry, and botany. Papers involving research results, new techniques of data acquisition or analysis, and regional or subject-oriented reviews or syntheses are considered for publication. Scientific papers usually fall into two main categories. Articles should not exceed 5000 words, or approximately 20 double-spaced typewritten pages, including tables, references, and an abstract of 200 words or fewer. All manuscripts submitted as Articles are reviewed by at least two referees. Research Reports, which are usually reviewed by at least one outside referee, should not exceed 1500 words or include more than two figures. Research Reports address technical developments, describe well-documented but preliminary research results, or present findings for which the Article format is not appropriate. Book or monograph Reviews of 500 words or less are also considered. Other categories of papers are occasionally published. All papers are published only in English. Abstracts of the Articles or Reports may be printed in other languages if supplied by the author(s) with English translations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信