跨越学科界限:南非历史/遗产归属的史学方向

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
R. Manyane
{"title":"跨越学科界限:南非历史/遗产归属的史学方向","authors":"R. Manyane","doi":"10.1080/17532523.2023.2235846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A stronger history/heritage relationship with a much longer genealogy than has hitherto been examined is explored in this article. Deploying a cultural-historical method alongside the Tswaing and Mphebatho museums, this study attempts to open more and new space for exploring the making of South Africa’s history- and heritage-making. Investing both transdisciplinary fields with potentially transformative and truly decolonising qualities entrusts them with social roles necessary for indigenous society’s survival. Not only do the deployed methodologies allow an in-depth historical investigation of heritage sites, but they also warrant transcendence beyond entrenched binaries between history and heritage and colonial-sponsored temporal frames. In this way, the text explores long-held and previously little-treated indigenous concepts of history and heritage which evolved into the colonial and post-colonial eras. As locations whose heritage profiles embrace human and non-human worlds, the selected museums illustrate how a broadened eco-culture heritage interfaces with history and identity. The two museums therefore encapsulate memory, indigenous knowledge, and culture generated over time through complex or intricate linkages with landscape and nature.","PeriodicalId":41857,"journal":{"name":"African Historical Review","volume":"54 1","pages":"38 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transgressing Disciplinary Bounds: Historiographical Directions in South Africa’s History/Heritage Affinities\",\"authors\":\"R. Manyane\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17532523.2023.2235846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A stronger history/heritage relationship with a much longer genealogy than has hitherto been examined is explored in this article. Deploying a cultural-historical method alongside the Tswaing and Mphebatho museums, this study attempts to open more and new space for exploring the making of South Africa’s history- and heritage-making. Investing both transdisciplinary fields with potentially transformative and truly decolonising qualities entrusts them with social roles necessary for indigenous society’s survival. Not only do the deployed methodologies allow an in-depth historical investigation of heritage sites, but they also warrant transcendence beyond entrenched binaries between history and heritage and colonial-sponsored temporal frames. In this way, the text explores long-held and previously little-treated indigenous concepts of history and heritage which evolved into the colonial and post-colonial eras. As locations whose heritage profiles embrace human and non-human worlds, the selected museums illustrate how a broadened eco-culture heritage interfaces with history and identity. The two museums therefore encapsulate memory, indigenous knowledge, and culture generated over time through complex or intricate linkages with landscape and nature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Historical Review\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"38 - 60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Historical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17532523.2023.2235846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Historical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17532523.2023.2235846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个更强的历史/遗产关系与一个更长的家谱比迄今为止已经检查了探讨在这篇文章。本研究采用文化历史的方法,与Tswaing和Mphebatho博物馆一起,试图为探索南非的历史和遗产创造开辟更多的新空间。投资这两个具有潜在变革和真正非殖民化性质的跨学科领域,赋予它们对土著社会生存所必需的社会作用。部署的方法不仅允许对遗产地进行深入的历史调查,而且还保证超越历史和遗产以及殖民赞助的时间框架之间根深蒂固的二元对立。通过这种方式,本文探讨了长期持有和以前很少处理的历史和遗产的土著概念,这些概念演变成殖民和后殖民时代。作为包含人类和非人类世界遗产的地点,入选的博物馆展示了扩大的生态文化遗产如何与历史和身份相结合。因此,两座博物馆通过与景观和自然的复杂联系,浓缩了记忆、本土知识和文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transgressing Disciplinary Bounds: Historiographical Directions in South Africa’s History/Heritage Affinities
Abstract A stronger history/heritage relationship with a much longer genealogy than has hitherto been examined is explored in this article. Deploying a cultural-historical method alongside the Tswaing and Mphebatho museums, this study attempts to open more and new space for exploring the making of South Africa’s history- and heritage-making. Investing both transdisciplinary fields with potentially transformative and truly decolonising qualities entrusts them with social roles necessary for indigenous society’s survival. Not only do the deployed methodologies allow an in-depth historical investigation of heritage sites, but they also warrant transcendence beyond entrenched binaries between history and heritage and colonial-sponsored temporal frames. In this way, the text explores long-held and previously little-treated indigenous concepts of history and heritage which evolved into the colonial and post-colonial eras. As locations whose heritage profiles embrace human and non-human worlds, the selected museums illustrate how a broadened eco-culture heritage interfaces with history and identity. The two museums therefore encapsulate memory, indigenous knowledge, and culture generated over time through complex or intricate linkages with landscape and nature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信