以花言巧语或演讲方式邀请对方作出回应

IF 0.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Language and Dialogue Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI:10.1075/ld.00137.cho

Hyangmi Choi, Peter Bull

{"title":"以花言巧语或演讲方式邀请对方作出回应","authors":"Hyangmi Choi, Peter Bull","doi":"10.1075/ld.00137.cho","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n English (an SVO language) and Korean (an SOV language) are polar opposites in terms of grammatical order. Studies\n show that rhetorical devices (RDs) are effective in generating collective audience responses in British political oratory. This\n article attempts to study the functions of RDs in Korean oratory and the importance of speech delivery. Through the analysis of\n the speaker-audience turn-taking systems, it is suggested that RDs do not function as cross-cultural universals in the invitation\n of audience responses but rather depend on the syntactic structure of a given language and the use of nonverbal factors. Thus, due\n to SOV language features, RDs do not play a predominant role in inviting audience responses in Korean oratory, whereas speech\n delivery is crucial.","PeriodicalId":42318,"journal":{"name":"Language and Dialogue","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Invitation to respond by rhetoric or delivery\",\"authors\":\"Hyangmi Choi, Peter Bull\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ld.00137.cho\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n English (an SVO language) and Korean (an SOV language) are polar opposites in terms of grammatical order. Studies\\n show that rhetorical devices (RDs) are effective in generating collective audience responses in British political oratory. This\\n article attempts to study the functions of RDs in Korean oratory and the importance of speech delivery. Through the analysis of\\n the speaker-audience turn-taking systems, it is suggested that RDs do not function as cross-cultural universals in the invitation\\n of audience responses but rather depend on the syntactic structure of a given language and the use of nonverbal factors. Thus, due\\n to SOV language features, RDs do not play a predominant role in inviting audience responses in Korean oratory, whereas speech\\n delivery is crucial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and Dialogue\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and Dialogue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00137.cho\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00137.cho","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

英语(一种SVO语言)和韩语(一种SOV语言)在语法顺序上是两极对立的。研究表明，在英国政治演讲中，修辞手段在引起听众的集体反应方面是有效的。本文试图研究语音在韩国语演讲中的作用以及语音在演讲中的重要性。通过对讲演者-听众轮流系统的分析，我们发现讲演者-听众轮流系统在吸引听众反应方面并不具有跨文化共性，而是依赖于给定语言的句法结构和非语言因素的使用。因此，由于SOV语言的特点，在韩国语演讲中，rd在吸引听众反应方面并不起主导作用，而演讲却是至关重要的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Invitation to respond by rhetoric or delivery

English (an SVO language) and Korean (an SOV language) are polar opposites in terms of grammatical order. Studies show that rhetorical devices (RDs) are effective in generating collective audience responses in British political oratory. This article attempts to study the functions of RDs in Korean oratory and the importance of speech delivery. Through the analysis of the speaker-audience turn-taking systems, it is suggested that RDs do not function as cross-cultural universals in the invitation of audience responses but rather depend on the syntactic structure of a given language and the use of nonverbal factors. Thus, due to SOV language features, RDs do not play a predominant role in inviting audience responses in Korean oratory, whereas speech delivery is crucial.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Language and Dialogue LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： In our post-Cartesian times human abilities are regarded as integrated and interacting abilities. Speaking, thinking, perceiving, having emotions need to be studied in interaction. Integration and interaction take place in dialogue. Scholars are called upon to go beyond reductive methods of abstraction and division and to take up the challenge of coming to terms with the complex whole. The conclusions drawn from reasoning about human behaviour in the humanities and social sciences have finally been proven by experiments in the natural sciences, especially neurology and sociobiology. What happens in the black box, can now, at least in part, be made visible. The journal intends to be an explicitly interdisciplinary journal reaching out to any discipline dealing with human abilities on the basis of consilience or the unity of knowledge. It is the challenge of post-Cartesian science to tackle the issue of how body, mind and language are interconnected and dialogically put to action. The journal invites papers which deal with ‘language and dialogue’ as an integrated whole in different languages and cultures and in different areas: everyday, institutional and literary, in theory and in practice, in business, in court, in the media, in politics and academia. In particular the humanities and social sciences are addressed: linguistics, literary studies, pragmatics, dialogue analysis, communication and cultural studies, applied linguistics, business studies, media studies, studies of language and the law, philosophy, psychology, cognitive sciences, sociology, anthropology and others. The journal Language and Dialogue is a peer reviewed journal and associated with the book series Dialogue Studies, edited by Edda Weigand.