英国文艺复兴戏剧中的遗嘱与遗嘱:纸道具、财产与富尔威尔的同类遗嘱

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Renaissance Drama Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1086/719472
Douglas J Clark
{"title":"英国文艺复兴戏剧中的遗嘱与遗嘱:纸道具、财产与富尔威尔的同类遗嘱","authors":"Douglas J Clark","doi":"10.1086/719472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ills helped to define the political and religious climate of early modern England. The Acts of Succession (1533–43/44), which eventually w gave Henry VIII power “to assign the crown by letters patent or his last will,” circumvented the traditional rules concerning the transference of royal power and helped fuel the dynastic crises that followed Edward VI’s death. Defining the relation between God’s salvific will and human will also helped mark intellectual and doctrinal boundaries in early modern Europe. As Risto Saarinen notes, “Freedomof choice became one of the great discussion topics of theReformation.” The few studies that have examined the important role that forms of will making and willpower play in sixteenthand seventeenth-century literature do, however, primarily focus on Shakespeare’s oeuvre. Despite “being so rich in Will,” we","PeriodicalId":53676,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama","volume":"50 1","pages":"103 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Will and Testament in English Renaissance Drama: Paper Props, Property, and Ulpian Fulwell’s Like Will to Like\",\"authors\":\"Douglas J Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/719472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ills helped to define the political and religious climate of early modern England. The Acts of Succession (1533–43/44), which eventually w gave Henry VIII power “to assign the crown by letters patent or his last will,” circumvented the traditional rules concerning the transference of royal power and helped fuel the dynastic crises that followed Edward VI’s death. Defining the relation between God’s salvific will and human will also helped mark intellectual and doctrinal boundaries in early modern Europe. As Risto Saarinen notes, “Freedomof choice became one of the great discussion topics of theReformation.” The few studies that have examined the important role that forms of will making and willpower play in sixteenthand seventeenth-century literature do, however, primarily focus on Shakespeare’s oeuvre. Despite “being so rich in Will,” we\",\"PeriodicalId\":53676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renaissance Drama\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"103 - 130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renaissance Drama\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/719472\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renaissance Drama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/719472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疾病帮助定义了早期现代英格兰的政治和宗教氛围。《继承法案》(1533–43/44)最终赋予亨利八世“通过专利书或其遗愿转让王位”的权力,绕过了有关王室权力转移的传统规则,并助长了爱德华六世去世后的王朝危机。界定上帝的救赎意志和人类意志之间的关系也有助于标记现代欧洲早期的知识和教义界限。正如里斯托·萨里宁(Risto Saarinen)所指出的,“自由选择成为宗教改革的一大讨论主题。”然而,少数研究主要集中在莎士比亚的作品上,这些研究考察了意志形成和意志力在十六世纪和十七世纪文学中的重要作用。尽管“意志如此丰富”,我们
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Will and Testament in English Renaissance Drama: Paper Props, Property, and Ulpian Fulwell’s Like Will to Like
ills helped to define the political and religious climate of early modern England. The Acts of Succession (1533–43/44), which eventually w gave Henry VIII power “to assign the crown by letters patent or his last will,” circumvented the traditional rules concerning the transference of royal power and helped fuel the dynastic crises that followed Edward VI’s death. Defining the relation between God’s salvific will and human will also helped mark intellectual and doctrinal boundaries in early modern Europe. As Risto Saarinen notes, “Freedomof choice became one of the great discussion topics of theReformation.” The few studies that have examined the important role that forms of will making and willpower play in sixteenthand seventeenth-century literature do, however, primarily focus on Shakespeare’s oeuvre. Despite “being so rich in Will,” we
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renaissance Drama
Renaissance Drama Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信