Grimmelshausen的Simplicissimus中的有限构造。一个样品

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Karsten Rinas
{"title":"Grimmelshausen的Simplicissimus中的有限构造。一个样品","authors":"Karsten Rinas","doi":"10.15452/studiagermanistica.2021.29.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the use of afinite constructions (auxiliary ellipsis) in a famous German novel of the 17th century: Grimmelshausen’s Simplicissimus. According to a study by Andersson, these constructions are used to create symmetrical clause endings. However, Andersson’s study has philological and methodological shortcomings because it is based on a problematic edition of the Simplicissimus, it uses vague criteria, and it does not reflect the crucial linguistic unit for complex constructions in the 17th century: the rhetorical period. Therefore, Andersson’s survey is repeated here under more adequate conditions.","PeriodicalId":36094,"journal":{"name":"Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Ostravienis Studia Germanistica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Afinite Konstruktionen in Grimmelshausens Simplicissimus. Eine Stichprobe\",\"authors\":\"Karsten Rinas\",\"doi\":\"10.15452/studiagermanistica.2021.29.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article deals with the use of afinite constructions (auxiliary ellipsis) in a famous German novel of the 17th century: Grimmelshausen’s Simplicissimus. According to a study by Andersson, these constructions are used to create symmetrical clause endings. However, Andersson’s study has philological and methodological shortcomings because it is based on a problematic edition of the Simplicissimus, it uses vague criteria, and it does not reflect the crucial linguistic unit for complex constructions in the 17th century: the rhetorical period. Therefore, Andersson’s survey is repeated here under more adequate conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Ostravienis Studia Germanistica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Ostravienis Studia Germanistica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15452/studiagermanistica.2021.29.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Ostravienis Studia Germanistica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15452/studiagermanistica.2021.29.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了17世纪德国著名小说《格林梅尔绍森的Simplicissimus》中非限定结构(辅助省略)的使用。根据Andersson的一项研究,这些结构用于创建对称的子句结尾。然而,Andersson的研究在语言学和方法论上存在缺陷,因为它是基于有问题的Simplicissimus版本,使用了模糊的标准,并且没有反映出17世纪复杂结构的关键语言单元:修辞时期。因此,Andersson的调查在更充分的条件下在此重复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Afinite Konstruktionen in Grimmelshausens Simplicissimus. Eine Stichprobe
This article deals with the use of afinite constructions (auxiliary ellipsis) in a famous German novel of the 17th century: Grimmelshausen’s Simplicissimus. According to a study by Andersson, these constructions are used to create symmetrical clause endings. However, Andersson’s study has philological and methodological shortcomings because it is based on a problematic edition of the Simplicissimus, it uses vague criteria, and it does not reflect the crucial linguistic unit for complex constructions in the 17th century: the rhetorical period. Therefore, Andersson’s survey is repeated here under more adequate conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Ostravienis Studia Germanistica
Acta Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Ostravienis Studia Germanistica Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信