新冠肺炎患者接受高剂量维生素D治疗的机制研究

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Mauro G. Silva, F. Inserra, J. Mariani, Laura Antonietti, M. Núñez, C. Tajer, L. Ferder, P. Inserra, F. Ross, Milagro Sánchez Cunto, Magalí Bertelli, G. de Larrañaga, Eliana M Cela, D. Maglio, M. Gironacci, W. Manucha
{"title":"新冠肺炎患者接受高剂量维生素D治疗的机制研究","authors":"Mauro G. Silva, F. Inserra, J. Mariani, Laura Antonietti, M. Núñez, C. Tajer, L. Ferder, P. Inserra, F. Ross, Milagro Sánchez Cunto, Magalí Bertelli, G. de Larrañaga, Eliana M Cela, D. Maglio, M. Gironacci, W. Manucha","doi":"10.37349/emed.2023.00137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate angiotensin II (Ang II) and Ang-(1-7) levels and the cytokine profile in patients hospitalized with mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and contrast them with patients with identical clinical conditions but treated with high doses of vitamin D (vitD).\nMethods: From the 218 patients recruited (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04411446), 16 participated in this sub-study and were randomized to a single oral dose of 500,000 IU vitD (n = 10) or placebo (n = 6). Plasmatic Ang II and Ang-(1-7) levels were determined by radioimmunoassay and interleukins (ILs) 1, 6, 8, and 10 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay before and after treatment. Parallel, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OH vitD) concentrations as vitD status was measured by a chemiluminescence immunoassay.\nResults: A trend towards an increase in Ang-(1-7) and a decrease in Ang II levels were observed in placebo- and vitD-treated COVID-19 patients compared to baseline values. There was no difference in Ang II and Ang-(1-7) levels between placebo- and vitD-treated COVID-19 patients. Similar results were obtained with ILs profile. COVID-19 patients showed an increase in the protective component of the RAS which was not improved by vitD treatment.\nConclusions: VitD did not improve RAS disbalance in COVID-19. Notwithstanding, the authors visualize that acute treatment with high doses of vitD may show a trend to a decline in inflammatory ILs and an increase in protective markers. Finally, the authors would like to highlight the limitations of this preliminary study, namely the small number of patients and the use of a large single bolus dose of vitD rather than lower daily doses for extended periods with prolonged follow-up times. All these factors need special consideration in the designs of new vitD supplementation trials. All these factors need special consideration in the designs of new vitD supplementation trials (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04411446).","PeriodicalId":72999,"journal":{"name":"Exploration of medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanistic approaching study in COVID-19 patients treated with high doses of vitamin D\",\"authors\":\"Mauro G. Silva, F. Inserra, J. Mariani, Laura Antonietti, M. Núñez, C. Tajer, L. Ferder, P. Inserra, F. Ross, Milagro Sánchez Cunto, Magalí Bertelli, G. de Larrañaga, Eliana M Cela, D. Maglio, M. Gironacci, W. Manucha\",\"doi\":\"10.37349/emed.2023.00137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To evaluate angiotensin II (Ang II) and Ang-(1-7) levels and the cytokine profile in patients hospitalized with mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and contrast them with patients with identical clinical conditions but treated with high doses of vitamin D (vitD).\\nMethods: From the 218 patients recruited (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04411446), 16 participated in this sub-study and were randomized to a single oral dose of 500,000 IU vitD (n = 10) or placebo (n = 6). Plasmatic Ang II and Ang-(1-7) levels were determined by radioimmunoassay and interleukins (ILs) 1, 6, 8, and 10 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay before and after treatment. Parallel, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OH vitD) concentrations as vitD status was measured by a chemiluminescence immunoassay.\\nResults: A trend towards an increase in Ang-(1-7) and a decrease in Ang II levels were observed in placebo- and vitD-treated COVID-19 patients compared to baseline values. There was no difference in Ang II and Ang-(1-7) levels between placebo- and vitD-treated COVID-19 patients. Similar results were obtained with ILs profile. COVID-19 patients showed an increase in the protective component of the RAS which was not improved by vitD treatment.\\nConclusions: VitD did not improve RAS disbalance in COVID-19. Notwithstanding, the authors visualize that acute treatment with high doses of vitD may show a trend to a decline in inflammatory ILs and an increase in protective markers. Finally, the authors would like to highlight the limitations of this preliminary study, namely the small number of patients and the use of a large single bolus dose of vitD rather than lower daily doses for extended periods with prolonged follow-up times. All these factors need special consideration in the designs of new vitD supplementation trials. All these factors need special consideration in the designs of new vitD supplementation trials (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04411446).\",\"PeriodicalId\":72999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploration of medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploration of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37349/emed.2023.00137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploration of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37349/emed.2023.00137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估2019年轻度冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)住院患者的血管紧张素II(Ang II)和Ang-(1-7)水平和细胞因子谱,并将其与临床条件相同但接受高剂量维生素D(vitD)治疗的患者进行对比,16人参与了这项子研究,并被随机分配到500000 IU维生素D的单次口服剂量(n=10)或安慰剂(n=6)中。用放射免疫分析法测定血浆Ang II和Ang-(1-7)水平,用酶联免疫吸附法测定治疗前后白细胞介素(IL)1、6、8和10以及肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平。平行地,通过化学发光免疫测定法测量血清25-羟基维生素D3(25-OH维生素D)浓度作为维生素D状态。结果:与基线值相比,在安慰剂和维生素D治疗的新冠肺炎患者中观察到Ang-(1-7)升高和Ang II水平降低的趋势。安慰剂和维生素D治疗的新冠肺炎患者的Ang II和Ang-(1-7)水平没有差异。ILs剖面也获得了类似的结果。新冠肺炎患者的RAS保护成分增加,但维生素D治疗并未改善。结论:维生素D不能改善新冠肺炎RAS失衡。尽管如此,作者认为,高剂量维生素D的急性治疗可能显示出炎症性ILs下降和保护性标志物增加的趋势。最后,作者想强调这项初步研究的局限性,即患者数量少,使用单次大剂量的维生素D,而不是在随访时间长的情况下长期使用较低的日剂量。在设计新的维生素D补充剂试验时,需要特别考虑所有这些因素。在设计新的维生素D补充试验时,所有这些因素都需要特别考虑(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04411446)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanistic approaching study in COVID-19 patients treated with high doses of vitamin D
Aim: To evaluate angiotensin II (Ang II) and Ang-(1-7) levels and the cytokine profile in patients hospitalized with mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and contrast them with patients with identical clinical conditions but treated with high doses of vitamin D (vitD). Methods: From the 218 patients recruited (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04411446), 16 participated in this sub-study and were randomized to a single oral dose of 500,000 IU vitD (n = 10) or placebo (n = 6). Plasmatic Ang II and Ang-(1-7) levels were determined by radioimmunoassay and interleukins (ILs) 1, 6, 8, and 10 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay before and after treatment. Parallel, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OH vitD) concentrations as vitD status was measured by a chemiluminescence immunoassay. Results: A trend towards an increase in Ang-(1-7) and a decrease in Ang II levels were observed in placebo- and vitD-treated COVID-19 patients compared to baseline values. There was no difference in Ang II and Ang-(1-7) levels between placebo- and vitD-treated COVID-19 patients. Similar results were obtained with ILs profile. COVID-19 patients showed an increase in the protective component of the RAS which was not improved by vitD treatment. Conclusions: VitD did not improve RAS disbalance in COVID-19. Notwithstanding, the authors visualize that acute treatment with high doses of vitD may show a trend to a decline in inflammatory ILs and an increase in protective markers. Finally, the authors would like to highlight the limitations of this preliminary study, namely the small number of patients and the use of a large single bolus dose of vitD rather than lower daily doses for extended periods with prolonged follow-up times. All these factors need special consideration in the designs of new vitD supplementation trials. All these factors need special consideration in the designs of new vitD supplementation trials (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04411446).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信