支持木材结构中建筑部件再利用设计策略的分类法

IF 3.1 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Margherita Lisco, Radhlinah Aulin
{"title":"支持木材结构中建筑部件再利用设计策略的分类法","authors":"Margherita Lisco, Radhlinah Aulin","doi":"10.1108/ci-11-2022-0293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe reuse of timber building parts, when designing new buildings, has become a topic of increasing discussion as a proposed circular solution in support of sustainable development goals. Designers face the difficulty of identifying and applying different design strategies for reuse due to multiple definitions, which are used interchangeably. The purpose of this study is to propose a taxonomy to define the relationships between various concepts and practices that comprise the relevant strategies for reuse, notably design for disassembly (DfD) and design for adaptability (DfA).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nLiterature reviews were conducted based on research publications over the previous 12 years and located through the Web of Science and Scopus.\n\n\nFindings\nA taxonomy for the design process grounded on two strategies for reuse is presented: DfD and DfA. Based on previous work, the taxonomy aims to build a vocabulary of definitions in DfD and DfA to support other researchers and practitioners working in the field.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe research is limited to the design phase of timber-based buildings. It does not take into account the other phases of the construction process, neither other kind of construction methods.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe application of the taxonomy can facilitate communication between different actors and provide a way for building product manufacturers to demonstrate their reuse credentials, enabling them to produce and promote compliant products and thereby support design for reuse strategies.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis paper could contribute to a closer collaboration of all stakeholders involved in the building process since the very early phases of the conceptual design.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper contributes a comprehensive taxonomy to support the deployment of circular reuse strategies and assist designers and other stakeholders from the earliest of phases in the building’s life cycle. The proposed definition framework provided by the taxonomy resolves the longstanding lack of a supporting vocabulary for reuse and can be used as a reference for researchers and practitioners working with the DfD and DfA.\n","PeriodicalId":45580,"journal":{"name":"Construction Innovation-England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taxonomy supporting design strategies for reuse of building parts in timber-based construction\",\"authors\":\"Margherita Lisco, Radhlinah Aulin\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ci-11-2022-0293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe reuse of timber building parts, when designing new buildings, has become a topic of increasing discussion as a proposed circular solution in support of sustainable development goals. Designers face the difficulty of identifying and applying different design strategies for reuse due to multiple definitions, which are used interchangeably. The purpose of this study is to propose a taxonomy to define the relationships between various concepts and practices that comprise the relevant strategies for reuse, notably design for disassembly (DfD) and design for adaptability (DfA).\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nLiterature reviews were conducted based on research publications over the previous 12 years and located through the Web of Science and Scopus.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nA taxonomy for the design process grounded on two strategies for reuse is presented: DfD and DfA. Based on previous work, the taxonomy aims to build a vocabulary of definitions in DfD and DfA to support other researchers and practitioners working in the field.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe research is limited to the design phase of timber-based buildings. It does not take into account the other phases of the construction process, neither other kind of construction methods.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe application of the taxonomy can facilitate communication between different actors and provide a way for building product manufacturers to demonstrate their reuse credentials, enabling them to produce and promote compliant products and thereby support design for reuse strategies.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThis paper could contribute to a closer collaboration of all stakeholders involved in the building process since the very early phases of the conceptual design.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper contributes a comprehensive taxonomy to support the deployment of circular reuse strategies and assist designers and other stakeholders from the earliest of phases in the building’s life cycle. The proposed definition framework provided by the taxonomy resolves the longstanding lack of a supporting vocabulary for reuse and can be used as a reference for researchers and practitioners working with the DfD and DfA.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction Innovation-England\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction Innovation-England\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-11-2022-0293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Innovation-England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ci-11-2022-0293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在设计新建筑时,木材建筑部件的再利用已成为一个越来越多的讨论话题,作为支持可持续发展目标的一种拟议的循环解决方案。由于多个定义是可互换使用的,设计师面临着识别和应用不同设计策略进行重用的困难。本研究的目的是提出一种分类法来定义各种概念和实践之间的关系,这些概念和实践包括相关的重用策略,特别是针对拆卸的设计(DfD)和针对适应性的设计(DfA)。设计/方法论/方法文献综述基于过去12年的研究出版物进行,并通过科学网和Scopus进行检索。发现基于两种重用策略的设计过程分类法:DfD和DfA。在先前工作的基础上,该分类法旨在建立DfD和DfA中的定义词汇表,以支持该领域的其他研究人员和从业者。研究局限性/含义研究仅限于木材建筑的设计阶段。它没有考虑施工过程的其他阶段,也没有考虑其他类型的施工方法。实际含义分类法的应用可以促进不同参与者之间的沟通,并为构建产品制造商提供一种展示其重用证书的方式,使他们能够生产和推广符合要求的产品,从而支持重用策略的设计。社会含义本文有助于从概念设计的早期阶段开始,参与建筑过程的所有利益相关者进行更密切的合作。独创性/价值本文提供了一个全面的分类法,以支持循环重用策略的部署,并从建筑生命周期的早期阶段就为设计师和其他利益相关者提供帮助。该分类法提供的拟议定义框架解决了长期以来缺乏可重用的支持词汇的问题,可作为研究人员和与国防部和国防部合作的从业者的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taxonomy supporting design strategies for reuse of building parts in timber-based construction
Purpose The reuse of timber building parts, when designing new buildings, has become a topic of increasing discussion as a proposed circular solution in support of sustainable development goals. Designers face the difficulty of identifying and applying different design strategies for reuse due to multiple definitions, which are used interchangeably. The purpose of this study is to propose a taxonomy to define the relationships between various concepts and practices that comprise the relevant strategies for reuse, notably design for disassembly (DfD) and design for adaptability (DfA). Design/methodology/approach Literature reviews were conducted based on research publications over the previous 12 years and located through the Web of Science and Scopus. Findings A taxonomy for the design process grounded on two strategies for reuse is presented: DfD and DfA. Based on previous work, the taxonomy aims to build a vocabulary of definitions in DfD and DfA to support other researchers and practitioners working in the field. Research limitations/implications The research is limited to the design phase of timber-based buildings. It does not take into account the other phases of the construction process, neither other kind of construction methods. Practical implications The application of the taxonomy can facilitate communication between different actors and provide a way for building product manufacturers to demonstrate their reuse credentials, enabling them to produce and promote compliant products and thereby support design for reuse strategies. Social implications This paper could contribute to a closer collaboration of all stakeholders involved in the building process since the very early phases of the conceptual design. Originality/value This paper contributes a comprehensive taxonomy to support the deployment of circular reuse strategies and assist designers and other stakeholders from the earliest of phases in the building’s life cycle. The proposed definition framework provided by the taxonomy resolves the longstanding lack of a supporting vocabulary for reuse and can be used as a reference for researchers and practitioners working with the DfD and DfA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Construction Innovation-England
Construction Innovation-England CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
12.10%
发文量
71
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信