庆大霉素或头孢菌素在犬外科伤口愈合中的局部应用

Q4 Veterinary
B. Minto, J. M. Pazzini, F. Kawamoto, G. Franco, C. P. Borsaro, Laura Zanato, Lismara Castro do Nascimento Hama, L. Amoroso, T. Magalhães
{"title":"庆大霉素或头孢菌素在犬外科伤口愈合中的局部应用","authors":"B. Minto, J. M. Pazzini, F. Kawamoto, G. Franco, C. P. Borsaro, Laura Zanato, Lismara Castro do Nascimento Hama, L. Amoroso, T. Magalhães","doi":"10.21708/avb.2022.16.4.10689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of local administration of gentamicin or cephalothin on the healing of surgical wounds in dogs. Thirty healthy dogs were submitted to surgical castration. They were divided into 2 groups of 15 animals. After the surgical procedure, two 0.6 cm circular cutaneous wounds were made in the abdominal region. Group 1 received 0.1 ml of 0.9% saline in one wound and 0.1 ml of gentamicin (40 mg / ml) in the other wound; and group 2 received 0.1 ml of 0.9% saline and 0.1 ml of cephalothin (200 mg / ml); respectively. All wounds were sutured and assessed macroscopically 1, 3 and 10 days after the operation. On day 10, an incisional biopsy was performed for histopathological evaluation. All analyzes of macroscopic variables did not show significant differences between groups (P <0.05). There were no significant differences between groups for microscopic evaluation of collagenization, vascularization, edema and inflammatory cells (P <0.05). Thus, the topical use of the tested antibiotics does not influence skin healing in dogs.","PeriodicalId":38626,"journal":{"name":"Acta Veterinaria Brasilica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topical application of gentamicin or cephalothin in the healing of surgical wounds in dogs\",\"authors\":\"B. Minto, J. M. Pazzini, F. Kawamoto, G. Franco, C. P. Borsaro, Laura Zanato, Lismara Castro do Nascimento Hama, L. Amoroso, T. Magalhães\",\"doi\":\"10.21708/avb.2022.16.4.10689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of local administration of gentamicin or cephalothin on the healing of surgical wounds in dogs. Thirty healthy dogs were submitted to surgical castration. They were divided into 2 groups of 15 animals. After the surgical procedure, two 0.6 cm circular cutaneous wounds were made in the abdominal region. Group 1 received 0.1 ml of 0.9% saline in one wound and 0.1 ml of gentamicin (40 mg / ml) in the other wound; and group 2 received 0.1 ml of 0.9% saline and 0.1 ml of cephalothin (200 mg / ml); respectively. All wounds were sutured and assessed macroscopically 1, 3 and 10 days after the operation. On day 10, an incisional biopsy was performed for histopathological evaluation. All analyzes of macroscopic variables did not show significant differences between groups (P <0.05). There were no significant differences between groups for microscopic evaluation of collagenization, vascularization, edema and inflammatory cells (P <0.05). Thus, the topical use of the tested antibiotics does not influence skin healing in dogs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Veterinaria Brasilica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Veterinaria Brasilica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21708/avb.2022.16.4.10689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Veterinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Veterinaria Brasilica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21708/avb.2022.16.4.10689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估庆大霉素或头孢噻吩局部给药对犬外科伤口愈合的影响。30只健康的狗接受了手术阉割。它们被分成2组,每组15只。手术后,在腹部区域形成两个0.6厘米的圆形皮肤伤口。第1组在一个伤口中接受0.1ml 0.9%盐水,在另一个伤口接受0.1ml庆大霉素(40mg/ml);第2组接受0.1毫升0.9%生理盐水和0.1毫升头孢噻吩(200毫克/毫升);分别地术后1、3和10天缝合所有伤口并进行宏观评估。第10天,进行切口活检以进行组织病理学评估。所有宏观变量的分析都没有显示出组间的显著差异(P<0.05)。在胶原化、血管化、水肿和炎症细胞的微观评估方面,组间没有显著差异(P>0.05)。因此,局部使用测试的抗生素不会影响狗的皮肤愈合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Topical application of gentamicin or cephalothin in the healing of surgical wounds in dogs
The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of local administration of gentamicin or cephalothin on the healing of surgical wounds in dogs. Thirty healthy dogs were submitted to surgical castration. They were divided into 2 groups of 15 animals. After the surgical procedure, two 0.6 cm circular cutaneous wounds were made in the abdominal region. Group 1 received 0.1 ml of 0.9% saline in one wound and 0.1 ml of gentamicin (40 mg / ml) in the other wound; and group 2 received 0.1 ml of 0.9% saline and 0.1 ml of cephalothin (200 mg / ml); respectively. All wounds were sutured and assessed macroscopically 1, 3 and 10 days after the operation. On day 10, an incisional biopsy was performed for histopathological evaluation. All analyzes of macroscopic variables did not show significant differences between groups (P <0.05). There were no significant differences between groups for microscopic evaluation of collagenization, vascularization, edema and inflammatory cells (P <0.05). Thus, the topical use of the tested antibiotics does not influence skin healing in dogs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Veterinaria Brasilica
Acta Veterinaria Brasilica Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信