辅助系统的数学建模:弥合分析模型与观测之间的差距

IF 3.4 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
James N. Grima-Cornish, Joseph N. Grima, Daphne Attard
{"title":"辅助系统的数学建模:弥合分析模型与观测之间的差距","authors":"James N. Grima-Cornish,&nbsp;Joseph N. Grima,&nbsp;Daphne Attard","doi":"10.1186/s40712-020-00125-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Poisson’s ratio, a property which quantifies the changes in thickness when a material is stretched and compressed, can be determined as the negative of the transverse strain over the applied strain. In the scientific literature, there are various ways how strain may be defined and the actual definition used could result in a different Poisson’s ratio being computed. This paper will look in more detail at this by comparing the more commonly used forms of strain and the Poisson’s ratio that is computable from them. More specifically, an attempt is made to assess through examples on the usefulness of the various formulations to properly describe what can actually be observed, thus providing a clearer picture of which form of Poisson’s ratio should be used in analytical modelling.</p>","PeriodicalId":592,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40712-020-00125-z","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematical modeling of auxetic systems: bridging the gap between analytical models and observation\",\"authors\":\"James N. Grima-Cornish,&nbsp;Joseph N. Grima,&nbsp;Daphne Attard\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40712-020-00125-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Poisson’s ratio, a property which quantifies the changes in thickness when a material is stretched and compressed, can be determined as the negative of the transverse strain over the applied strain. In the scientific literature, there are various ways how strain may be defined and the actual definition used could result in a different Poisson’s ratio being computed. This paper will look in more detail at this by comparing the more commonly used forms of strain and the Poisson’s ratio that is computable from them. More specifically, an attempt is made to assess through examples on the usefulness of the various formulations to properly describe what can actually be observed, thus providing a clearer picture of which form of Poisson’s ratio should be used in analytical modelling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40712-020-00125-z\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40712-020-00125-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40712-020-00125-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

泊松比是一种量化材料被拉伸和压缩时厚度变化的特性,它可以被确定为横向应变与施加应变的负值。在科学文献中,有各种不同的方法来定义应变,而实际使用的定义可能会导致计算出不同的泊松比。本文将通过比较更常用的应变形式和由它们计算的泊松比来更详细地研究这一点。更具体地说,我们试图通过实例来评估各种公式的有用性,以适当地描述实际可以观察到的东西,从而提供一幅更清晰的画面,说明在分析建模中应该使用哪种形式的泊松比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mathematical modeling of auxetic systems: bridging the gap between analytical models and observation

Mathematical modeling of auxetic systems: bridging the gap between analytical models and observation

The Poisson’s ratio, a property which quantifies the changes in thickness when a material is stretched and compressed, can be determined as the negative of the transverse strain over the applied strain. In the scientific literature, there are various ways how strain may be defined and the actual definition used could result in a different Poisson’s ratio being computed. This paper will look in more detail at this by comparing the more commonly used forms of strain and the Poisson’s ratio that is computable from them. More specifically, an attempt is made to assess through examples on the usefulness of the various formulations to properly describe what can actually be observed, thus providing a clearer picture of which form of Poisson’s ratio should be used in analytical modelling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信