国际恐怖主义与大规模杀伤性武器:海上航行自由、主权和访问权的相对化

U. Reis, Tarin Cristino Frota Mont'Alverne
{"title":"国际恐怖主义与大规模杀伤性武器:海上航行自由、主权和访问权的相对化","authors":"U. Reis, Tarin Cristino Frota Mont'Alverne","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n82p92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper will analyze the international normativity produced for the inspection of the transport of weapons of mass destruction by sea. Starting from the normative inflation and the emergence of new actors concerned with the issue, the question is: to what extent has terrorism forced the reconfiguration of the governing principles of navigation on the high seas? The research, anchored in the deductive method and in literary and normative sources, is divided into three sections. It is concluded that there is a different reassessment of the principles of the law of the sea. While multilateral arrangements do not contradict the conventional maritime regime, Security Council resolutions do so.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"41 1","pages":"92-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n82p92","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Terrorismo internacional e armas de destruição em massa: relativizando a liberdade de navegação, a soberania e o direito de visita em alto mar\",\"authors\":\"U. Reis, Tarin Cristino Frota Mont'Alverne\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n82p92\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper will analyze the international normativity produced for the inspection of the transport of weapons of mass destruction by sea. Starting from the normative inflation and the emergence of new actors concerned with the issue, the question is: to what extent has terrorism forced the reconfiguration of the governing principles of navigation on the high seas? The research, anchored in the deductive method and in literary and normative sources, is divided into three sections. It is concluded that there is a different reassessment of the principles of the law of the sea. While multilateral arrangements do not contradict the conventional maritime regime, Security Council resolutions do so.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"92-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n82p92\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n82p92\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2019v41n82p92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将分析为检查海上大规模杀伤性武器运输而产生的国际规范。从规范性的通货膨胀和与该问题有关的新行为体的出现出发,问题是:恐怖主义在多大程度上迫使公海航行管理原则的重新配置?研究,锚定在演绎法和文学和规范的来源,分为三个部分。结论是,对海洋法原则有一种不同的重新评价。虽然多边安排并不违反常规海事制度,但安全理事会的决议却违反常规海事制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Terrorismo internacional e armas de destruição em massa: relativizando a liberdade de navegação, a soberania e o direito de visita em alto mar
This paper will analyze the international normativity produced for the inspection of the transport of weapons of mass destruction by sea. Starting from the normative inflation and the emergence of new actors concerned with the issue, the question is: to what extent has terrorism forced the reconfiguration of the governing principles of navigation on the high seas? The research, anchored in the deductive method and in literary and normative sources, is divided into three sections. It is concluded that there is a different reassessment of the principles of the law of the sea. While multilateral arrangements do not contradict the conventional maritime regime, Security Council resolutions do so.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信