儿童早期发展和妇女体面工作:一粒种子种两棵树?

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW
Megan Rose Bryer, Yana van Leeve
{"title":"儿童早期发展和妇女体面工作:一粒种子种两棵树?","authors":"Megan Rose Bryer, Yana van Leeve","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2023.2214371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines the tension in the South African early childhood development policy space between expanding necessary social services to young children (and their caregivers) and increasing job opportunities for women, in the context of neoliberal economic policies aimed at decreasing public spending on social services. These tensions arise most sharply between developing a universal system for early learning provisioning – analogous to systems for basic education – and leading early learning expansion through small-scale private providers, hoping that markets will resolve challenges around sustainable employment opportunities and quality and access to early learning programmes. Our aim is to contribute to a broader discussion on the intersections between economics and human rights. We question the possibility for meaningfully realising the rights of young children in the context of economic policies that constrain the state and position a job as the only means through which to empower. We conclude that economic policies geared towards reducing the role of the state in delivering services while markets are handed responsibility to resolve access to fundamental rights will not deliver universal care and education to young children or decent work for women, at least not simultaneously.","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"38 1","pages":"261 - 284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early childhood development and decent jobs for women: Planting two trees from one seed?\",\"authors\":\"Megan Rose Bryer, Yana van Leeve\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02587203.2023.2214371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article examines the tension in the South African early childhood development policy space between expanding necessary social services to young children (and their caregivers) and increasing job opportunities for women, in the context of neoliberal economic policies aimed at decreasing public spending on social services. These tensions arise most sharply between developing a universal system for early learning provisioning – analogous to systems for basic education – and leading early learning expansion through small-scale private providers, hoping that markets will resolve challenges around sustainable employment opportunities and quality and access to early learning programmes. Our aim is to contribute to a broader discussion on the intersections between economics and human rights. We question the possibility for meaningfully realising the rights of young children in the context of economic policies that constrain the state and position a job as the only means through which to empower. We conclude that economic policies geared towards reducing the role of the state in delivering services while markets are handed responsibility to resolve access to fundamental rights will not deliver universal care and education to young children or decent work for women, at least not simultaneously.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal on Human Rights\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"261 - 284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal on Human Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2023.2214371\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2023.2214371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了在旨在减少社会服务公共支出的新自由主义经济政策背景下,南非幼儿发展政策空间在扩大对幼儿(及其照顾者)的必要社会服务和增加妇女就业机会之间的紧张关系。在开发一个通用的早期学习供应系统之间,这些紧张关系最为突出 – 类似于基础教育系统 – 以及通过小型私营供应商领导早期学习的扩展,希望市场能够解决可持续就业机会、质量和获得早期学习方案方面的挑战。我们的目标是促进更广泛地讨论经济与人权之间的交叉点。我们质疑在限制国家并将工作定位为赋予权力的唯一手段的经济政策背景下,有意义地实现幼儿权利的可能性。我们得出的结论是,旨在减少国家在提供服务方面的作用,同时让市场负责解决获得基本权利的问题的经济政策,不会为幼儿提供普遍的护理和教育,也不会为妇女提供体面的工作,至少不会同时实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early childhood development and decent jobs for women: Planting two trees from one seed?
Abstract This article examines the tension in the South African early childhood development policy space between expanding necessary social services to young children (and their caregivers) and increasing job opportunities for women, in the context of neoliberal economic policies aimed at decreasing public spending on social services. These tensions arise most sharply between developing a universal system for early learning provisioning – analogous to systems for basic education – and leading early learning expansion through small-scale private providers, hoping that markets will resolve challenges around sustainable employment opportunities and quality and access to early learning programmes. Our aim is to contribute to a broader discussion on the intersections between economics and human rights. We question the possibility for meaningfully realising the rights of young children in the context of economic policies that constrain the state and position a job as the only means through which to empower. We conclude that economic policies geared towards reducing the role of the state in delivering services while markets are handed responsibility to resolve access to fundamental rights will not deliver universal care and education to young children or decent work for women, at least not simultaneously.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信