法庭和摄像机:隐私应该成为法庭报道的关注点吗?＊

Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17577632.2018.1466442

Anna K. Bernzen

{"title":"法庭和摄像机:隐私应该成为法庭报道的关注点吗?＊","authors":"Anna K. Bernzen","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2018.1466442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Video journalists currently reporting from English courts operate within a strict framework set by both statutory and common law. The main argument for these tight rules has traditionally been that the cameras pose a threat to the proper administration of justice. Their potential danger to the privacy of those involved in the trial, on the other hand, has never been properly examined. This comment aims to fill this gap and argues in favour of taking privacy into account when developing future rules for using cameras in court.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2018.1466442","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The court and the camera: should privacy be a concern in court reporting?*\",\"authors\":\"Anna K. Bernzen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17577632.2018.1466442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Video journalists currently reporting from English courts operate within a strict framework set by both statutory and common law. The main argument for these tight rules has traditionally been that the cameras pose a threat to the proper administration of justice. Their potential danger to the privacy of those involved in the trial, on the other hand, has never been properly examined. This comment aims to fill this gap and argues in favour of taking privacy into account when developing future rules for using cameras in court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Media Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2018.1466442\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Media Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2018.1466442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2018.1466442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

目前，英国法院的视频记者在成文法和普通法的严格框架下进行报道。传统上，支持这些严格规定的主要论点是，摄像头会对适当的司法管理构成威胁。另一方面，它们对参与审判的人的隐私的潜在危险从未得到适当的审查。这篇评论旨在填补这一空白，并主张在制定未来在法庭上使用相机的规则时考虑到隐私。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The court and the camera: should privacy be a concern in court reporting?*

ABSTRACT Video journalists currently reporting from English courts operate within a strict framework set by both statutory and common law. The main argument for these tight rules has traditionally been that the cameras pose a threat to the proper administration of justice. Their potential danger to the privacy of those involved in the trial, on the other hand, has never been properly examined. This comment aims to fill this gap and argues in favour of taking privacy into account when developing future rules for using cameras in court.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Media Law Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The only platform for focused, rigorous analysis of global developments in media law, this peer-reviewed journal, launched in Summer 2009, is: essential for teaching and research, essential for practice, essential for policy-making. It turns the spotlight on all those aspects of law which impinge on and shape modern media practices - from regulation and ownership, to libel law and constitutional aspects of broadcasting such as free speech and privacy, obscenity laws, copyright, piracy, and other aspects of IT law. The result is the first journal to take a serious view of law through the lens. The first issues feature articles on a wide range of topics such as: Developments in Defamation · Balancing Freedom of Expression and Privacy in the European Court of Human Rights · The Future of Public Television · Cameras in the Courtroom - Media Access to Classified Documents · Advertising Revenue v Editorial Independence · Gordon Ramsay: Obscenity Regulation Pioneer?