谁知道你呢?英国“对话式”社会护理评估中的话题转换管理

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Val Williams, Jon Symonds
{"title":"谁知道你呢?英国“对话式”社会护理评估中的话题转换管理","authors":"Val Williams, Jon Symonds","doi":"10.1177/14733250221124212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social care assessments in England are envisaged as conversations, implying an informal and congenial encounter, in which both parties have equal roles. However, a fundamental task during an assessment is to gauge eligibility for resources. This article uses conversation analysis to consider audio recorded data of seven social care assessments in England. The article focuses on topic shifts, where the assessor introduces an ‘assessment relevant’ topic, and we examine how these shifts are managed. Sometimes assessors used what was said by the client or by the carer as a ‘pivot’, which could produce a feeling of friendly conversation, but simultaneously lead to an intrusion into the client’s personal knowledge domain. Assessors also had other strategies for framing a ‘next question’, such as noticing something in the environment, referring to previous notes or to previous conversations. The conversation might feel ‘friendly’, but these tactics could lead to the personal life domain of the client being inadvertently revealed and used as relevant for their assessment.","PeriodicalId":47677,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Social Work","volume":"21 1","pages":"1104 - 1122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who knows what about you? Managing topic shifts during ‘conversational’ social care assessments in England\",\"authors\":\"Val Williams, Jon Symonds\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14733250221124212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social care assessments in England are envisaged as conversations, implying an informal and congenial encounter, in which both parties have equal roles. However, a fundamental task during an assessment is to gauge eligibility for resources. This article uses conversation analysis to consider audio recorded data of seven social care assessments in England. The article focuses on topic shifts, where the assessor introduces an ‘assessment relevant’ topic, and we examine how these shifts are managed. Sometimes assessors used what was said by the client or by the carer as a ‘pivot’, which could produce a feeling of friendly conversation, but simultaneously lead to an intrusion into the client’s personal knowledge domain. Assessors also had other strategies for framing a ‘next question’, such as noticing something in the environment, referring to previous notes or to previous conversations. The conversation might feel ‘friendly’, but these tactics could lead to the personal life domain of the client being inadvertently revealed and used as relevant for their assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Social Work\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"1104 - 1122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250221124212\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250221124212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在英格兰,社会护理评估被设想为对话,这意味着一种非正式的、意气相投的相遇,双方在其中扮演着平等的角色。然而,评估期间的一项基本任务是评估是否有资格获得资源。本文使用会话分析来考虑英国七项社会护理评估的音频记录数据。这篇文章的重点是主题转换,评估员介绍了一个“与评估相关”的主题,我们研究了如何管理这些转换。有时,评估员会将客户或护理人员所说的话作为“支点”,这可能会产生友好交谈的感觉,但同时也会导致对客户个人知识领域的入侵。评估人员还制定了其他策略来构建“下一个问题”,比如注意环境中的一些东西,参考之前的笔记或之前的对话。谈话可能会让人感觉“友好”,但这些策略可能会导致客户的个人生活领域被无意中暴露出来,并被用作与他们的评估相关的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who knows what about you? Managing topic shifts during ‘conversational’ social care assessments in England
Social care assessments in England are envisaged as conversations, implying an informal and congenial encounter, in which both parties have equal roles. However, a fundamental task during an assessment is to gauge eligibility for resources. This article uses conversation analysis to consider audio recorded data of seven social care assessments in England. The article focuses on topic shifts, where the assessor introduces an ‘assessment relevant’ topic, and we examine how these shifts are managed. Sometimes assessors used what was said by the client or by the carer as a ‘pivot’, which could produce a feeling of friendly conversation, but simultaneously lead to an intrusion into the client’s personal knowledge domain. Assessors also had other strategies for framing a ‘next question’, such as noticing something in the environment, referring to previous notes or to previous conversations. The conversation might feel ‘friendly’, but these tactics could lead to the personal life domain of the client being inadvertently revealed and used as relevant for their assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Qualitative Social Work provides a forum for those interested in qualitative research and evaluation and in qualitative approaches to practice. The journal facilitates interactive dialogue and integration between those interested in qualitative research and methodology and those involved in the world of practice. It reflects the fact that these worlds are increasingly international and interdisciplinary in nature. The journal is a forum for rigorous dialogue that promotes qualitatively informed professional practice and inquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信