毛绒和仿结松

IF 0.3 2区 艺术学 0 ART
American Art Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1086/707475
D. McCarthy
{"title":"毛绒和仿结松","authors":"D. McCarthy","doi":"10.1086/707475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"H. C. Westermann’s sculptures The Plush (1963) and Imitation Knotty Pine (1966)—are representative of his occasionally facetious response to concurrent sculptural practices in the United States. A close look at his media, production, form, and content reveals a disaffection for the then-fashionable emphases on industrial materials and technologies, material specificity, and reductive form that were linked to David Smith and, later, the minimalists. Like Marisol and Robert Arneson, Westermann rejected modernist ideas about sculpture. This article offers an historically grounded, contextual analysis of these two works and unearths an extensive web of references and allusions. Westermann’s response to modernist and minimalist practices was a refusal of aesthetic autonomy for an art that openly celebrated, even insisted upon, a democratic ethos.","PeriodicalId":43434,"journal":{"name":"American Art","volume":"33 1","pages":"32 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/707475","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Of Plush and Imitation Knotty Pine\",\"authors\":\"D. McCarthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/707475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"H. C. Westermann’s sculptures The Plush (1963) and Imitation Knotty Pine (1966)—are representative of his occasionally facetious response to concurrent sculptural practices in the United States. A close look at his media, production, form, and content reveals a disaffection for the then-fashionable emphases on industrial materials and technologies, material specificity, and reductive form that were linked to David Smith and, later, the minimalists. Like Marisol and Robert Arneson, Westermann rejected modernist ideas about sculpture. This article offers an historically grounded, contextual analysis of these two works and unearths an extensive web of references and allusions. Westermann’s response to modernist and minimalist practices was a refusal of aesthetic autonomy for an art that openly celebrated, even insisted upon, a democratic ethos.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Art\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"32 - 55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/707475\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Art\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/707475\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/707475","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

H. C. Westermann的雕塑《长毛绒》(1963)和《仿节松》(1966)是他对当时美国雕塑实践的偶尔滑稽回应的代表。仔细观察他的媒介、制作、形式和内容,就会发现他对当时流行的强调工业材料和技术、材料专一性和还原形式的不满,这些都与大卫·史密斯(David Smith)和后来的极简主义者有关。像玛丽索尔和罗伯特·阿内森一样,韦斯特曼拒绝现代主义关于雕塑的想法。本文对这两部作品进行了历史背景分析,发掘了大量的参考文献和典故。韦斯特曼对现代主义和极简主义实践的回应,是对一种公开庆祝甚至坚持民主精神的艺术的审美自治的拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Of Plush and Imitation Knotty Pine
H. C. Westermann’s sculptures The Plush (1963) and Imitation Knotty Pine (1966)—are representative of his occasionally facetious response to concurrent sculptural practices in the United States. A close look at his media, production, form, and content reveals a disaffection for the then-fashionable emphases on industrial materials and technologies, material specificity, and reductive form that were linked to David Smith and, later, the minimalists. Like Marisol and Robert Arneson, Westermann rejected modernist ideas about sculpture. This article offers an historically grounded, contextual analysis of these two works and unearths an extensive web of references and allusions. Westermann’s response to modernist and minimalist practices was a refusal of aesthetic autonomy for an art that openly celebrated, even insisted upon, a democratic ethos.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: American Art is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to exploring all aspects of the nation"s visual heritage from colonial to contemporary times. Through a broad interdisciplinary approach, American Art provides an understanding not only of specific artists and art objects, but also of the cultural factors that have shaped American art over three centuries of national experience. The fine arts are the journal"s primary focus, but its scope encompasses all aspects of the nation"s visual culture, including popular culture, public art, film, electronic multimedia, and decorative arts and crafts. American Art embraces all methods of investigation to explore America·s rich and diverse artistic legacy, from traditional formalism to analyses of social context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信