2020 Ai音乐世代挑战:奥尼尔“1001”风格的双跳

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Bob L. Sturm, H. Maruri-Aguilar
{"title":"2020 Ai音乐世代挑战:奥尼尔“1001”风格的双跳","authors":"Bob L. Sturm, H. Maruri-Aguilar","doi":"10.5920/jcms.950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ai Music Generation Challenge 2020 had three objectives: 1) to promote meaningful approaches to evaluating artificial intelligence (Ai) applied to music;2) to see how music Ai research can benefit from considering traditional music, and how traditional music might benefit from music Ai research; and 3)to facilitate discussions about the ethics of music Ai research applied to traditional music practices.There were six participants and a benchmark in the challenge, each competing to build an artificial system that generates the most plausible double jigs, as judged against the 365 published in solved'', but that the evaluation of such systems can be done in meaningful ways.The article ends by reflecting on the challenge and considering the coming 2021 challenge.","PeriodicalId":52272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Music Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ai Music Generation Challenge 2020: Double Jigs in the Style of O'Neill's ``1001''\",\"authors\":\"Bob L. Sturm, H. Maruri-Aguilar\",\"doi\":\"10.5920/jcms.950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Ai Music Generation Challenge 2020 had three objectives: 1) to promote meaningful approaches to evaluating artificial intelligence (Ai) applied to music;2) to see how music Ai research can benefit from considering traditional music, and how traditional music might benefit from music Ai research; and 3)to facilitate discussions about the ethics of music Ai research applied to traditional music practices.There were six participants and a benchmark in the challenge, each competing to build an artificial system that generates the most plausible double jigs, as judged against the 365 published in solved'', but that the evaluation of such systems can be done in meaningful ways.The article ends by reflecting on the challenge and considering the coming 2021 challenge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Creative Music Systems\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Creative Music Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5920/jcms.950\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Music Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5920/jcms.950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

2020年人工智能音乐生成挑战赛有三个目标:1)促进有意义的方法来评估应用于音乐的人工智能(Ai);2)看看音乐人工智能研究如何从考虑传统音乐中受益,以及传统音乐如何从音乐人工智能研究中受益;3)促进对应用于传统音乐实践的音乐伦理研究的讨论。这项挑战有六名参与者和一个基准,每个人都在竞争建立一个人工系统,产生最合理的双夹具,与发表在《解决》杂志上的365个结论相比较,但对这些系统的评估可以以有意义的方式完成。文章最后反思了这一挑战,并考虑了即将到来的2021年挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ai Music Generation Challenge 2020: Double Jigs in the Style of O'Neill's ``1001''
The Ai Music Generation Challenge 2020 had three objectives: 1) to promote meaningful approaches to evaluating artificial intelligence (Ai) applied to music;2) to see how music Ai research can benefit from considering traditional music, and how traditional music might benefit from music Ai research; and 3)to facilitate discussions about the ethics of music Ai research applied to traditional music practices.There were six participants and a benchmark in the challenge, each competing to build an artificial system that generates the most plausible double jigs, as judged against the 365 published in solved'', but that the evaluation of such systems can be done in meaningful ways.The article ends by reflecting on the challenge and considering the coming 2021 challenge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Creative Music Systems
Journal of Creative Music Systems Arts and Humanities-Music
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信