改革“艺术防腐剂”:19世纪英国印刷手册与设计话语

IF 0.5 Q1 HISTORY
Book History Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1353/bh.2022.0012
J. Horrocks
{"title":"改革“艺术防腐剂”:19世纪英国印刷手册与设计话语","authors":"J. Horrocks","doi":"10.1353/bh.2022.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Discussions of nineteenth-century letterpress design typically follow a narrative of loss and restoration: the explosion of typographic materials and machines made possible by industrialization led to a decline in the visual quality of letterpress production, which was reversed only at the end of the century by William Morris and the advent of modern graphic design. Many specimens of Victorian letterpress printing—especially job printing, which was constrained by fewer conventions than book or newspaper printing—seem to confirm this narrative. Nineteenth-century British printing manuals, however, often depicted the practice of display composition not as declining or fallen, but as entering an exhilarating moment of reformation. In the printing manuals I examine here, authors attempted to guide this reformation by offering printers a rudimentary theory of letterpress page design, one based largely on the tenets of Victorian design reform. Design reform, begun in the 1830s in response to fears that British industrial commodities were being outsold by better-designed foreign products, established graphic principles for designers and created a body of theoretical literature that was remediated by printers looking for a fixed definition of visual excellence upon which letterpress design could be premised. While modern viewers might question the design principles underlying much \"artistic\" job printing of the late-Victorian era, the aesthetic rules explained in printing manuals of the time do much to turn what can sometimes appear to be a bewildering profusion of archaic visual elements back into a legible architecture of the page.","PeriodicalId":43753,"journal":{"name":"Book History","volume":"25 1","pages":"351 - 382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reforming the \\\"Art Preservative\\\": Nineteenth-Century British Printing Manuals and the Discourse of Design\",\"authors\":\"J. Horrocks\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/bh.2022.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Discussions of nineteenth-century letterpress design typically follow a narrative of loss and restoration: the explosion of typographic materials and machines made possible by industrialization led to a decline in the visual quality of letterpress production, which was reversed only at the end of the century by William Morris and the advent of modern graphic design. Many specimens of Victorian letterpress printing—especially job printing, which was constrained by fewer conventions than book or newspaper printing—seem to confirm this narrative. Nineteenth-century British printing manuals, however, often depicted the practice of display composition not as declining or fallen, but as entering an exhilarating moment of reformation. In the printing manuals I examine here, authors attempted to guide this reformation by offering printers a rudimentary theory of letterpress page design, one based largely on the tenets of Victorian design reform. Design reform, begun in the 1830s in response to fears that British industrial commodities were being outsold by better-designed foreign products, established graphic principles for designers and created a body of theoretical literature that was remediated by printers looking for a fixed definition of visual excellence upon which letterpress design could be premised. While modern viewers might question the design principles underlying much \\\"artistic\\\" job printing of the late-Victorian era, the aesthetic rules explained in printing manuals of the time do much to turn what can sometimes appear to be a bewildering profusion of archaic visual elements back into a legible architecture of the page.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Book History\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"351 - 382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Book History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/bh.2022.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Book History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bh.2022.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:关于19世纪凸版印刷设计的讨论通常遵循一种关于损失和修复的叙述:工业化使印刷材料和机器成为可能,导致凸版印刷的视觉质量下降,直到本世纪末,威廉·莫里斯和现代平面设计的出现才扭转了这种局面。维多利亚凸版印刷术的许多样本——尤其是与书籍或报纸印刷术相比,受到较少惯例限制的印刷术——似乎证实了这一说法。然而,19世纪的英国印刷手册经常将展示构图的实践描述为不是衰落或衰落,而是进入了一个令人振奋的改革时刻。在我在这里查看的印刷手册中,作者试图通过向印刷商提供凸版页面设计的基本理论来指导这一改革,该理论主要基于维多利亚设计改革的原则。19世纪30年代开始的设计改革,是为了应对人们对英国工业商品被设计更好的外国产品所取代的担忧,为设计师确立了图形原则,并创造了一系列理论文献,这些文献被印刷商修复,以寻找一个固定的视觉卓越定义,凸版设计可以以此为前提。虽然现代观众可能会质疑维多利亚时代晚期许多“艺术”印刷的设计原则,但当时印刷手册中解释的美学规则在很大程度上将有时看起来令人困惑的大量古老视觉元素重新变成了清晰的页面结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reforming the "Art Preservative": Nineteenth-Century British Printing Manuals and the Discourse of Design
Abstract:Discussions of nineteenth-century letterpress design typically follow a narrative of loss and restoration: the explosion of typographic materials and machines made possible by industrialization led to a decline in the visual quality of letterpress production, which was reversed only at the end of the century by William Morris and the advent of modern graphic design. Many specimens of Victorian letterpress printing—especially job printing, which was constrained by fewer conventions than book or newspaper printing—seem to confirm this narrative. Nineteenth-century British printing manuals, however, often depicted the practice of display composition not as declining or fallen, but as entering an exhilarating moment of reformation. In the printing manuals I examine here, authors attempted to guide this reformation by offering printers a rudimentary theory of letterpress page design, one based largely on the tenets of Victorian design reform. Design reform, begun in the 1830s in response to fears that British industrial commodities were being outsold by better-designed foreign products, established graphic principles for designers and created a body of theoretical literature that was remediated by printers looking for a fixed definition of visual excellence upon which letterpress design could be premised. While modern viewers might question the design principles underlying much "artistic" job printing of the late-Victorian era, the aesthetic rules explained in printing manuals of the time do much to turn what can sometimes appear to be a bewildering profusion of archaic visual elements back into a legible architecture of the page.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Book History
Book History HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信