为什么西奥多·海克要和白玫瑰说话

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN
Helena M. Tomko
{"title":"为什么西奥多·海克要和白玫瑰说话","authors":"Helena M. Tomko","doi":"10.1080/00787191.2023.2171033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the resonance of Theodor Haecker’s writing within the White Rose movement. Haecker met with the students multiple times in 1942, the year they circulated their first five leaflets, and on 4 February 1943, two weeks before the final leaflet’s distribution. Why did this Catholic inner exile, translator of Newman and Kierkegaard, and one-time Weimar public intellectual speak to the students so powerfully as they conceived their political action and wrote their leaflets? The article draws on recent departures in inner-exile studies to propose that their fluency in the rhetorical techniques of non-conformist discourse in the Third Reich equipped them to embed arguments in their leaflets that were gleaned from the interpretive community within which they encountered Haecker. His final reading to them from his book about theodicy — why things are as they are — offers a case study in reading with care the texts they read with purpose.","PeriodicalId":53844,"journal":{"name":"OXFORD GERMAN STUDIES","volume":"52 1","pages":"105 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Theodor Haecker Spoke to the White Rose\",\"authors\":\"Helena M. Tomko\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00787191.2023.2171033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers the resonance of Theodor Haecker’s writing within the White Rose movement. Haecker met with the students multiple times in 1942, the year they circulated their first five leaflets, and on 4 February 1943, two weeks before the final leaflet’s distribution. Why did this Catholic inner exile, translator of Newman and Kierkegaard, and one-time Weimar public intellectual speak to the students so powerfully as they conceived their political action and wrote their leaflets? The article draws on recent departures in inner-exile studies to propose that their fluency in the rhetorical techniques of non-conformist discourse in the Third Reich equipped them to embed arguments in their leaflets that were gleaned from the interpretive community within which they encountered Haecker. His final reading to them from his book about theodicy — why things are as they are — offers a case study in reading with care the texts they read with purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OXFORD GERMAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"105 - 119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OXFORD GERMAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00787191.2023.2171033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OXFORD GERMAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00787191.2023.2171033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了西奥多·海克的写作在白玫瑰运动中的共鸣。在1942年,也就是他们分发首批五份传单的那一年,以及1943年2月4日,也就是最后一份传单分发的前两周,Haecker多次与学生会面。为什么这位内心的天主教流亡者,纽曼和克尔凯郭尔的译者,以及曾经的魏玛公共知识分子,在学生们构思他们的政治行动和写传单时,对他们如此有力地讲话?这篇文章借鉴了最近的内部流亡研究,提出他们在第三帝国的不墨客话语中流利的修辞技巧使他们能够在他们的传单中嵌入论点,这些传单是从他们遇到Haecker的解释社区收集的。他给他们读的最后一篇关于神正论的书——为什么事物是这样的——提供了一个案例研究,让他们仔细阅读有目的阅读的文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Theodor Haecker Spoke to the White Rose
This article considers the resonance of Theodor Haecker’s writing within the White Rose movement. Haecker met with the students multiple times in 1942, the year they circulated their first five leaflets, and on 4 February 1943, two weeks before the final leaflet’s distribution. Why did this Catholic inner exile, translator of Newman and Kierkegaard, and one-time Weimar public intellectual speak to the students so powerfully as they conceived their political action and wrote their leaflets? The article draws on recent departures in inner-exile studies to propose that their fluency in the rhetorical techniques of non-conformist discourse in the Third Reich equipped them to embed arguments in their leaflets that were gleaned from the interpretive community within which they encountered Haecker. His final reading to them from his book about theodicy — why things are as they are — offers a case study in reading with care the texts they read with purpose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
OXFORD GERMAN STUDIES
OXFORD GERMAN STUDIES LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Oxford German Studies is a fully refereed journal, and publishes in English and German, aiming to present contributions from all countries and to represent as wide a range of topics and approaches throughout German studies as can be achieved. The thematic coverage of the journal continues to be based on an inclusive conception of German studies, centred on the study of German literature from the Middle Ages to the present, but extending a warm welcome to interdisciplinary and comparative topics, and to contributions from neighbouring areas such as language study and linguistics, history, philosophy, sociology, music, and art history. The editors are literary scholars, but seek advice from specialists in other areas as appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信