英国脱欧与欧盟-英国自由贸易协定：起草原产地规则时的注意事项

IF 1 Q2 LAW

Journal of International Trade Law and Policy Pub Date : 2019-06-17 DOI:10.1108/JITLP-11-2018-0053

Roberto Soprano

{"title":"英国脱欧与欧盟-英国自由贸易协定：起草原产地规则时的注意事项","authors":"Roberto Soprano","doi":"10.1108/JITLP-11-2018-0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to highlight the pros and cons of different models of the European Union (EU)-style Rules of Origin (RoO) that could be chosen by negotiators for a future UK–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA). It will also underline the impact that any choice would have on economic operators and certain criteria that should be evaluated before taking any decisions on the adoption of RoO.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper will describe three different RoO models that could be chosen by negotiators. For each of them, it analyses the pros and cons and the impact on economic operators.\n\n\nFindings\nThe choice of a RoO would have an impact on future EU–UK trade relations. It will affect the utilization rate of the FTA as well as investment (and divestment) corporate strategies in the UK and EU.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper introduces different criteria to evaluate the impact of RoO that should be taken into consideration by negotiators. It emphasizes that RoO should be simple, predictable, coherent, IT compatible and easily adaptable.\n","PeriodicalId":42719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Trade Law and Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JITLP-11-2018-0053","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brexit and the EU–UK free trade agreement: dos and don’ts when drafting rules of origin\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Soprano\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JITLP-11-2018-0053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to highlight the pros and cons of different models of the European Union (EU)-style Rules of Origin (RoO) that could be chosen by negotiators for a future UK–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA). It will also underline the impact that any choice would have on economic operators and certain criteria that should be evaluated before taking any decisions on the adoption of RoO.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe paper will describe three different RoO models that could be chosen by negotiators. For each of them, it analyses the pros and cons and the impact on economic operators.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe choice of a RoO would have an impact on future EU–UK trade relations. It will affect the utilization rate of the FTA as well as investment (and divestment) corporate strategies in the UK and EU.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe paper introduces different criteria to evaluate the impact of RoO that should be taken into consideration by negotiators. It emphasizes that RoO should be simple, predictable, coherent, IT compatible and easily adaptable.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":42719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Trade Law and Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JITLP-11-2018-0053\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Trade Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-11-2018-0053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Trade Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-11-2018-0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是强调欧盟(EU)式原产地规则(RoO)的不同模式的利弊，这些模式可以由谈判者为未来的英国-欧盟自由贸易协定(FTA)选择。它还将强调任何选择将对经济经营者产生的影响，以及在就采用RoO作出任何决定之前应评估的某些标准。设计/方法/方法本文将描述谈判者可以选择的三种不同的RoO模型。对于每一种方案，分析了利弊和对经济经营者的影响。结果表明，欧盟选择退出欧盟将对未来欧盟与英国的贸易关系产生影响。这将影响到自由贸易协定的利用率以及在英国和欧盟的投资(和撤资)企业战略。原创性/价值本文介绍了谈判者应该考虑的评估原创影响的不同标准。它强调RoO应该简单、可预测、连贯、It兼容和易于适应。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Brexit and the EU–UK free trade agreement: dos and don’ts when drafting rules of origin

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to highlight the pros and cons of different models of the European Union (EU)-style Rules of Origin (RoO) that could be chosen by negotiators for a future UK–EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA). It will also underline the impact that any choice would have on economic operators and certain criteria that should be evaluated before taking any decisions on the adoption of RoO. Design/methodology/approach The paper will describe three different RoO models that could be chosen by negotiators. For each of them, it analyses the pros and cons and the impact on economic operators. Findings The choice of a RoO would have an impact on future EU–UK trade relations. It will affect the utilization rate of the FTA as well as investment (and divestment) corporate strategies in the UK and EU. Originality/value The paper introduces different criteria to evaluate the impact of RoO that should be taken into consideration by negotiators. It emphasizes that RoO should be simple, predictable, coherent, IT compatible and easily adaptable.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of International Trade Law and Policy LAW-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of International Trade Law and Policy is a peer reviewed interdisciplinary journal with a focus upon the nexus of international economic policy and international economic law. It is receptive, but not limited, to the methods of economics, law, and the social sciences. As scholars tend to read individual articles of particular interest to them, rather than an entire issue, authors are not required to write with full accessibility to readers from all disciplines within the purview of the Journal. However, interdisciplinary communication should be fostered where possible. Thus economists can utilize quantitative methods (including econometrics and statistics), while legal scholars and political scientists can invoke specialized techniques and theories. Appendices are encouraged for more technical material. Submissions should contribute to understanding international economic policy and the institutional/legal architecture in which it is implemented. Submissions can be conceptual (theoretical) and/or empirical and/or doctrinal in content. Topics of interest to the Journal are expected to evolve over time but include: -All aspects of international trade law and policy -All aspects of international investment law and policy -All aspects of international development law and policy -All aspects of international financial law and policy -Relationship between economic policy and law and other societal concerns, including the human rights, environment, health, development, and national security