{"title":"金融侵权与欧盟国际私法:对“金融损害”发生地的寻找会结束吗?","authors":"Frederick Rielaender","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2022.2056970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The determination of jurisdiction and the applicable law concerning violations of financial law remains one of the most controversial subjects in EU private international law. Departing from its previously wayward case law regarding jurisdiction in disputes concerning purely financial losses, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has finally taken a more principled approach in its Verenigeng van Effectenbezitters (VEB) decision, concentrating jurisdiction for actions based on issuer liability for inaccurate disclosures in the courts of the Member States where the issuer “has complied, for the purposes of its listing on the stock exchange, with the statutory reporting obligations”. While the judgment marks a necessary step forward, this paper argues that a market-oriented rule, which the CJEU has thus far not fully embraced, for conferring jurisdiction in disputes concerning infringements of securities law needs to be further developed and consistently applied in determining the applicable law.","PeriodicalId":44028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Private International Law","volume":"18 1","pages":"28 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial torts and EU private international law: will the search for the place of “financial damage” ever come to an end?\",\"authors\":\"Frederick Rielaender\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17441048.2022.2056970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The determination of jurisdiction and the applicable law concerning violations of financial law remains one of the most controversial subjects in EU private international law. Departing from its previously wayward case law regarding jurisdiction in disputes concerning purely financial losses, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has finally taken a more principled approach in its Verenigeng van Effectenbezitters (VEB) decision, concentrating jurisdiction for actions based on issuer liability for inaccurate disclosures in the courts of the Member States where the issuer “has complied, for the purposes of its listing on the stock exchange, with the statutory reporting obligations”. While the judgment marks a necessary step forward, this paper argues that a market-oriented rule, which the CJEU has thus far not fully embraced, for conferring jurisdiction in disputes concerning infringements of securities law needs to be further developed and consistently applied in determining the applicable law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Private International Law\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"28 - 55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Private International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2022.2056970\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Private International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2022.2056970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
关于金融违法行为的管辖权和适用法律的确定,一直是欧盟国际私法中争议最大的问题之一。欧洲联盟法院(CJEU)在其Verenigeng van Effectenbezitters (VEB)决定中,与之前关于纯财务损失纠纷管辖权的判例法不同,最终采取了一种更有原则的做法,将基于发行人对不准确披露的责任的诉讼管辖权集中在发行人“为其在证券交易所上市而遵守”的成员国法院。有法定的报告义务”。虽然该判决标志着向前迈出了必要的一步,但本文认为,欧洲法院迄今尚未完全接受的以市场为导向的规则,需要进一步发展,并在确定适用法律时始终适用证券法侵权纠纷的管辖权。
Financial torts and EU private international law: will the search for the place of “financial damage” ever come to an end?
The determination of jurisdiction and the applicable law concerning violations of financial law remains one of the most controversial subjects in EU private international law. Departing from its previously wayward case law regarding jurisdiction in disputes concerning purely financial losses, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has finally taken a more principled approach in its Verenigeng van Effectenbezitters (VEB) decision, concentrating jurisdiction for actions based on issuer liability for inaccurate disclosures in the courts of the Member States where the issuer “has complied, for the purposes of its listing on the stock exchange, with the statutory reporting obligations”. While the judgment marks a necessary step forward, this paper argues that a market-oriented rule, which the CJEU has thus far not fully embraced, for conferring jurisdiction in disputes concerning infringements of securities law needs to be further developed and consistently applied in determining the applicable law.