R. Hartley, Marybeth J. Mattingly, J. Waldfogel, Christopher Wimer
{"title":"为工作中的儿童保育买单?评估政策在负担得起的护理和儿童贫困中的作用","authors":"R. Hartley, Marybeth J. Mattingly, J. Waldfogel, Christopher Wimer","doi":"10.1086/718635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unless parents have a family member at home who can provide care, most will need childcare to work and achieve career mobility. Existing policies to help families with child-care costs in the United States include means-tested subsidies and nonrefundable tax credits. Many low-income families are eligible for the means-tested benefits, yet receipt rates are low. These families are generally excluded from the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (CDCTC) because it is nonrefundable. We analyze two approaches to reduce child-care expenses for low-income working families: (1) making the CDCTC fully refundable and increasing its generosity and (2) providing subsidies to ensure families spend no more than the Department of Health and Human Services affordability guidelines suggest. We evaluate how much such policies would alleviate child poverty through reducing child-care costs and through increasing earnings by enabling parents to work more.","PeriodicalId":47665,"journal":{"name":"Social Service Review","volume":"96 1","pages":"34 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paying for Childcare to Work? Evaluating the Role of Policy in Affordable Care and Child Poverty\",\"authors\":\"R. Hartley, Marybeth J. Mattingly, J. Waldfogel, Christopher Wimer\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/718635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unless parents have a family member at home who can provide care, most will need childcare to work and achieve career mobility. Existing policies to help families with child-care costs in the United States include means-tested subsidies and nonrefundable tax credits. Many low-income families are eligible for the means-tested benefits, yet receipt rates are low. These families are generally excluded from the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (CDCTC) because it is nonrefundable. We analyze two approaches to reduce child-care expenses for low-income working families: (1) making the CDCTC fully refundable and increasing its generosity and (2) providing subsidies to ensure families spend no more than the Department of Health and Human Services affordability guidelines suggest. We evaluate how much such policies would alleviate child poverty through reducing child-care costs and through increasing earnings by enabling parents to work more.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Service Review\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"34 - 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Service Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/718635\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Service Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/718635","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
除非父母家中有家庭成员可以提供照顾,否则大多数人将需要儿童保育来工作和实现职业流动性。在美国,帮助承担托儿费用的家庭的现有政策包括经经济状况调查的补贴和不可退还的税收抵免。许多低收入家庭有资格获得经经济状况调查的福利,但领取率很低。这些家庭通常被排除在儿童和受抚养人护理税收抵免(CDCTC)之外,因为它是不可退还的。我们分析了减少低收入工薪家庭托儿费用的两种方法:(1)使CDCTC全额退还并增加其慷慨程度;(2)提供补贴以确保家庭的支出不超过卫生与人类服务部(Department of Health and Human Services)可负担性指南所建议的水平。我们评估了这些政策通过降低儿童保育成本和通过使父母更多地工作来增加收入来减轻儿童贫困的程度。
Paying for Childcare to Work? Evaluating the Role of Policy in Affordable Care and Child Poverty
Unless parents have a family member at home who can provide care, most will need childcare to work and achieve career mobility. Existing policies to help families with child-care costs in the United States include means-tested subsidies and nonrefundable tax credits. Many low-income families are eligible for the means-tested benefits, yet receipt rates are low. These families are generally excluded from the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (CDCTC) because it is nonrefundable. We analyze two approaches to reduce child-care expenses for low-income working families: (1) making the CDCTC fully refundable and increasing its generosity and (2) providing subsidies to ensure families spend no more than the Department of Health and Human Services affordability guidelines suggest. We evaluate how much such policies would alleviate child poverty through reducing child-care costs and through increasing earnings by enabling parents to work more.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1927, Social Service Review is devoted to the publication of thought-provoking, original research on social welfare policy, organization, and practice. Articles in the Review analyze issues from the points of view of various disciplines, theories, and methodological traditions, view critical problems in context, and carefully consider long-range solutions. The Review features balanced, scholarly contributions from social work and social welfare scholars, as well as from members of the various allied disciplines engaged in research on human behavior, social systems, history, public policy, and social services.