现代机构设计中的办公室与专业

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Arie Rosen
{"title":"现代机构设计中的办公室与专业","authors":"Arie Rosen","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2020-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Office and profession represent two distinct modes by which work can be regulated. The first has a primarily instrumental logic, which aims to align the private interests of the office-holder with the desired function of the office nexus. The second involves a distinctly anti-instrumentalist commitment, which is supposed to prevent the complete instrumentalization of professional expertise by clients and bureaucracies. This article considers the conjunction of office and profession as an element of institutional design of the sort found in the modern judiciary, the hospital, and the university. After analysing the useful tension that can be achieved by having office-holders who are also professionals, it then explains why recent social developments have put this mechanism under considerable strain in a way that should be a cause for concern for public lawyers and legal theorists.","PeriodicalId":46289,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Law Journal","volume":"70 1","pages":"198 - 213"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Office and profession in the design of modern institutions\",\"authors\":\"Arie Rosen\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/utlj-2020-0038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Office and profession represent two distinct modes by which work can be regulated. The first has a primarily instrumental logic, which aims to align the private interests of the office-holder with the desired function of the office nexus. The second involves a distinctly anti-instrumentalist commitment, which is supposed to prevent the complete instrumentalization of professional expertise by clients and bureaucracies. This article considers the conjunction of office and profession as an element of institutional design of the sort found in the modern judiciary, the hospital, and the university. After analysing the useful tension that can be achieved by having office-holders who are also professionals, it then explains why recent social developments have put this mechanism under considerable strain in a way that should be a cause for concern for public lawyers and legal theorists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Toronto Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"198 - 213\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Toronto Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2020-0038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj-2020-0038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:办公室和职业代表了两种不同的工作监管模式。第一种主要是工具性逻辑,旨在使办公室负责人的私人利益与办公室关系的预期功能相一致。第二个涉及明显的反工具主义承诺,旨在防止客户和官僚机构将专业知识完全工具化。本文认为,办公室和专业的结合是现代司法、医院和大学中那种制度设计的一个元素。在分析了由专业人士担任公职可以实现的有益紧张关系后,它解释了为什么最近的社会发展使这一机制受到相当大的压力,这应该引起公共律师和法律理论家的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Office and profession in the design of modern institutions
Abstract:Office and profession represent two distinct modes by which work can be regulated. The first has a primarily instrumental logic, which aims to align the private interests of the office-holder with the desired function of the office nexus. The second involves a distinctly anti-instrumentalist commitment, which is supposed to prevent the complete instrumentalization of professional expertise by clients and bureaucracies. This article considers the conjunction of office and profession as an element of institutional design of the sort found in the modern judiciary, the hospital, and the university. After analysing the useful tension that can be achieved by having office-holders who are also professionals, it then explains why recent social developments have put this mechanism under considerable strain in a way that should be a cause for concern for public lawyers and legal theorists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信