社论评论

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Michael E Rezaee, Vernon M Pais
{"title":"社论评论","authors":"Michael E Rezaee, Vernon M Pais","doi":"10.1017/s0307013100001178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate around the post-modernist movement in contemporary art and literature has provided material for a great deal of critical discussion and cultural self-examination and, with some exceptions, the debate has been confined to predominantly 'western' cultures. In this issue, Greg Jusdanis looks at some of the taken-for-granteds of this debate, more particularly the implication of the concept the 'West', for Greek literary selfawareness. The discussion is relevant to medievalists, too, of course, for it touches indirectly upon another debate of a more historiographical nature, namely, the problems of ethnocentrism in history-writing which have been evident throughout the evolution of modern Byzantine Studies. Notions of what counts as 'Greek', as 'western', or what counts as evidence of 'Slav' influence, and so on, have played a significant role; and while the assumptions upon which much of the debate was originally founded are now for the most part regarded as either outmoded or irrelevant, it is important to observe how these valences work themselves out through a different set of contemporary discourses.","PeriodicalId":43258,"journal":{"name":"BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s0307013100001178","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial Comment\",\"authors\":\"Michael E Rezaee, Vernon M Pais\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0307013100001178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The debate around the post-modernist movement in contemporary art and literature has provided material for a great deal of critical discussion and cultural self-examination and, with some exceptions, the debate has been confined to predominantly 'western' cultures. In this issue, Greg Jusdanis looks at some of the taken-for-granteds of this debate, more particularly the implication of the concept the 'West', for Greek literary selfawareness. The discussion is relevant to medievalists, too, of course, for it touches indirectly upon another debate of a more historiographical nature, namely, the problems of ethnocentrism in history-writing which have been evident throughout the evolution of modern Byzantine Studies. Notions of what counts as 'Greek', as 'western', or what counts as evidence of 'Slav' influence, and so on, have played a significant role; and while the assumptions upon which much of the debate was originally founded are now for the most part regarded as either outmoded or irrelevant, it is important to observe how these valences work themselves out through a different set of contemporary discourses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/s0307013100001178\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0307013100001178\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0307013100001178","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

围绕当代艺术和文学中的后现代主义运动的辩论为大量批判性讨论和文化自省提供了材料,除了一些例外,辩论一直局限于主要的“西方”文化。在本期中,Greg Jusdanis着眼于这场争论中一些理所当然的东西,尤其是“西方”这个概念对希腊文学自我意识的含义。当然,这一讨论也与中世纪主义者有关,因为它间接触及了另一场更具史学性质的辩论,即历史写作中的种族中心主义问题,这一问题在现代拜占庭研究的发展过程中一直很明显。什么是“希腊”,什么是“西方”,什么是“斯拉夫”影响的证据,等等,这些概念都发挥了重要作用;虽然许多争论最初所依据的假设现在大多被认为是过时或无关紧要的,但重要的是要观察这些价值是如何通过一组不同的当代话语来发挥作用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editorial Comment
The debate around the post-modernist movement in contemporary art and literature has provided material for a great deal of critical discussion and cultural self-examination and, with some exceptions, the debate has been confined to predominantly 'western' cultures. In this issue, Greg Jusdanis looks at some of the taken-for-granteds of this debate, more particularly the implication of the concept the 'West', for Greek literary selfawareness. The discussion is relevant to medievalists, too, of course, for it touches indirectly upon another debate of a more historiographical nature, namely, the problems of ethnocentrism in history-writing which have been evident throughout the evolution of modern Byzantine Studies. Notions of what counts as 'Greek', as 'western', or what counts as evidence of 'Slav' influence, and so on, have played a significant role; and while the assumptions upon which much of the debate was originally founded are now for the most part regarded as either outmoded or irrelevant, it is important to observe how these valences work themselves out through a different set of contemporary discourses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES
BYZANTINE AND MODERN GREEK STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies is an internationally recognised, peer-reviewed journal and one of the leading publications in its field. It is viewed as an important outlet for current research. Published twice a year in spring and autumn, its remit has always been to facilitate the publication of high-quality research and discussion in all aspects of Byzantine and Modern Greek scholarship, whether historical, literary or social-anthropological. It welcomes research, criticism, contributions on theory and method in the form of articles, critical studies and short notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信