坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆Muhimbili国立医院终末期肾病患者血液透析治疗依从性及其影响因素

Salumu Mohamedi, I. Mosha
{"title":"坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆Muhimbili国立医院终末期肾病患者血液透析治疗依从性及其影响因素","authors":"Salumu Mohamedi, I. Mosha","doi":"10.3390/kidneydial2010014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maintenance hemodialysis services continue to rise globally. We evaluated adherence to hemodialysis therapy and contributing factors among end-stage renal disease patients at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. A cross-sectional study was done involving 265 end-stage renal disease patients who were being treated at Muhimbili National Hospital, in Dar es Salaam. The study population selected included adult patients (18 years and above) with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who were on hemodialysis. Data were entered into SPSS and imported into STATA for analysis. Numeric variables were summarized using the mean and standard deviation, and categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and proportions. A log-binomial regression model was used to estimate the risk factors associated with non-adherence, while multivariable log-binomial regression was used to control for confounders and test for the effect modifiers. All tests were two-tailed and the significance level was set at 5%. The parameters used to assess non-adherence to hemodialysis therapy in this study were the skipping of one or more hemodialysis sessions within the most recent 1 month or shortening one or more hemodialysis sessions by 10 or more minutes within the most recent 1 month. A session missed due to hospitalization or other medical reasons was not considered as non-adherence. All 265 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 191 (72.1%) were males. The rate of full adherence to the hemodialysis sessions was 64.2%. However, factors associated with the adherence to hemodialysis were the source of funding for hemodialysis (RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.96), the occupation of the respondents (RR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.44, 1.94), marital status (RR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.03, 3.77), and monthly income (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.51). Adherence to hemodialysis therapy among ESRD patients at Muhimbili National Hospital was high and within the range of most published studies. Hemodialysis attendance among participants depended on the source of funding, marital status, occupation, and monthly income. Patients should be informed by the health care workers on the importance of adhering to hemodialysis sessions. Further studies should be done to explore the factors influencing adherence to hemodialysis, as it was noted that adherence was low among some patients.","PeriodicalId":74038,"journal":{"name":"Kidney and dialysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemodialysis Therapy Adherence and Contributing Factors among End-Stage Renal Disease Patients at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Salumu Mohamedi, I. Mosha\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/kidneydial2010014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Maintenance hemodialysis services continue to rise globally. We evaluated adherence to hemodialysis therapy and contributing factors among end-stage renal disease patients at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. A cross-sectional study was done involving 265 end-stage renal disease patients who were being treated at Muhimbili National Hospital, in Dar es Salaam. The study population selected included adult patients (18 years and above) with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who were on hemodialysis. Data were entered into SPSS and imported into STATA for analysis. Numeric variables were summarized using the mean and standard deviation, and categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and proportions. A log-binomial regression model was used to estimate the risk factors associated with non-adherence, while multivariable log-binomial regression was used to control for confounders and test for the effect modifiers. All tests were two-tailed and the significance level was set at 5%. The parameters used to assess non-adherence to hemodialysis therapy in this study were the skipping of one or more hemodialysis sessions within the most recent 1 month or shortening one or more hemodialysis sessions by 10 or more minutes within the most recent 1 month. A session missed due to hospitalization or other medical reasons was not considered as non-adherence. All 265 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 191 (72.1%) were males. The rate of full adherence to the hemodialysis sessions was 64.2%. However, factors associated with the adherence to hemodialysis were the source of funding for hemodialysis (RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.96), the occupation of the respondents (RR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.44, 1.94), marital status (RR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.03, 3.77), and monthly income (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.51). Adherence to hemodialysis therapy among ESRD patients at Muhimbili National Hospital was high and within the range of most published studies. Hemodialysis attendance among participants depended on the source of funding, marital status, occupation, and monthly income. Patients should be informed by the health care workers on the importance of adhering to hemodialysis sessions. Further studies should be done to explore the factors influencing adherence to hemodialysis, as it was noted that adherence was low among some patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney and dialysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney and dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/kidneydial2010014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney and dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/kidneydial2010014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

维持性血液透析服务在全球范围内持续增长。我们评估了坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆Muhimbili国立医院终末期肾病患者对血液透析治疗的依从性和影响因素。一项横断面研究涉及265名在达累斯萨拉姆Muhimbili国家医院接受治疗的终末期肾病患者。选择的研究人群包括接受血液透析的终末期肾病(ESRD)成年患者(18岁及以上)。将数据输入SPSS并导入STATA进行分析。数值变量使用平均值和标准差进行汇总,分类变量使用频率和比例进行汇总。使用对数二项回归模型来估计与不依从性相关的风险因素,而使用多变量对数二项式回归来控制混杂因素并测试影响修正因子。所有测试都是双尾的,显著性水平设定为5%。本研究中用于评估血液透析治疗不依从性的参数是最近1个月内跳过一次或多次血液透析,或最近1个月中将一次或多次血液透析缩短10分钟或更长时间。由于住院或其他医疗原因而错过的疗程不被视为不依从。所有265名患者均被纳入分析,其中191名(72.1%)为男性。完全坚持血液透析的比率为64.2%。然而,与坚持血液透析相关的因素是血液透析的资金来源(RR=0.70,95%CI:0.48,0.96)、受访者的职业(RR=1.59,95%CI:1.44,1.94)、婚姻状况(RR=1.97,95%CI:1.03,3.77),和月收入(RR=0.92,95%CI:0.62,1.51)。Muhimbili国立医院ESRD患者对血液透析治疗的依从性很高,在大多数已发表的研究范围内。参与者的血液透析出勤率取决于资金来源、婚姻状况、职业和月收入。医护人员应告知患者坚持血液透析的重要性。应进一步研究影响血液透析依从性的因素,因为注意到一些患者的依从性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hemodialysis Therapy Adherence and Contributing Factors among End-Stage Renal Disease Patients at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Maintenance hemodialysis services continue to rise globally. We evaluated adherence to hemodialysis therapy and contributing factors among end-stage renal disease patients at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. A cross-sectional study was done involving 265 end-stage renal disease patients who were being treated at Muhimbili National Hospital, in Dar es Salaam. The study population selected included adult patients (18 years and above) with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who were on hemodialysis. Data were entered into SPSS and imported into STATA for analysis. Numeric variables were summarized using the mean and standard deviation, and categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and proportions. A log-binomial regression model was used to estimate the risk factors associated with non-adherence, while multivariable log-binomial regression was used to control for confounders and test for the effect modifiers. All tests were two-tailed and the significance level was set at 5%. The parameters used to assess non-adherence to hemodialysis therapy in this study were the skipping of one or more hemodialysis sessions within the most recent 1 month or shortening one or more hemodialysis sessions by 10 or more minutes within the most recent 1 month. A session missed due to hospitalization or other medical reasons was not considered as non-adherence. All 265 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 191 (72.1%) were males. The rate of full adherence to the hemodialysis sessions was 64.2%. However, factors associated with the adherence to hemodialysis were the source of funding for hemodialysis (RR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.96), the occupation of the respondents (RR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.44, 1.94), marital status (RR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.03, 3.77), and monthly income (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.51). Adherence to hemodialysis therapy among ESRD patients at Muhimbili National Hospital was high and within the range of most published studies. Hemodialysis attendance among participants depended on the source of funding, marital status, occupation, and monthly income. Patients should be informed by the health care workers on the importance of adhering to hemodialysis sessions. Further studies should be done to explore the factors influencing adherence to hemodialysis, as it was noted that adherence was low among some patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信