Quantulacumque lucretiana。关于卢克雷齐奥在文艺复兴晚期的财富的新线索

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Philosophical Readings Pub Date : 2020-10-16 DOI:10.5281/ZENODO.4068386

P. Cherchi

{"title":"Quantulacumque lucretiana。关于卢克雷齐奥在文艺复兴晚期的财富的新线索","authors":"P. Cherchi","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.4068386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay collects evidence of Lucretius’s presence in areas where researchers have not ventured, convinced that he was largely a poet who was read for excerpting precious images but disregarded his materialistic ideas. This essay proves that he was read by literary theorists, mithographers, meteorologists, embryologists, scholars interested in magnetism, and in the causes of dreams. The quotations culled in this paper point out new paths of investigation, and prove by and large that in Italy Lucretius was held as a serious observer of natural phenomena long before Gassendi made him popular by the middle of the Seventeenth Century.","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantulacumque lucretiana. Nuove piste di ricerca sulla fortuna di Lucrezio nel tardo Rinascimento\",\"authors\":\"P. Cherchi\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.4068386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay collects evidence of Lucretius’s presence in areas where researchers have not ventured, convinced that he was largely a poet who was read for excerpting precious images but disregarded his materialistic ideas. This essay proves that he was read by literary theorists, mithographers, meteorologists, embryologists, scholars interested in magnetism, and in the causes of dreams. The quotations culled in this paper point out new paths of investigation, and prove by and large that in Italy Lucretius was held as a serious observer of natural phenomena long before Gassendi made him popular by the middle of the Seventeenth Century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Readings\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Readings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4068386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Readings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4068386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章收集了卢克莱修出现在研究人员没有冒险的领域的证据，相信他在很大程度上是一位诗人，因为他被阅读是为了摘录珍贵的图像，但却忽视了他的唯物主义思想。这篇文章证明，文学理论家、占星家、气象学家、胚胎学家、对磁学和做梦原因感兴趣的学者都读过他的书。本文中的引文指出了新的调查途径，并大体证明，早在17世纪中期加森迪使卢克莱修流行之前，他就已经在意大利被视为一位认真的自然现象观察者。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Quantulacumque lucretiana. Nuove piste di ricerca sulla fortuna di Lucrezio nel tardo Rinascimento

This essay collects evidence of Lucretius’s presence in areas where researchers have not ventured, convinced that he was largely a poet who was read for excerpting precious images but disregarded his materialistic ideas. This essay proves that he was read by literary theorists, mithographers, meteorologists, embryologists, scholars interested in magnetism, and in the causes of dreams. The quotations culled in this paper point out new paths of investigation, and prove by and large that in Italy Lucretius was held as a serious observer of natural phenomena long before Gassendi made him popular by the middle of the Seventeenth Century.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Philosophical Readings Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

14 weeks

期刊介绍： Philosophical Readings, a four-monthly journal, ISSN 2036-4989, features articles, discussions, translations, reviews, and bibliographical information on all philosophical disciplines. Philosophical Readings is a Open Access journal devoted to the promotion of competent and definitive contributions to philosophical knowledge. Not associated with any school or group, not the organ of any association or institution, it is interested in persistent and resolute inquiries into root questions, regardless of the writer’s affiliation. The journal welcomes also works that fall into various disciplines: religion, history, literature, law, political science, computer scnfoience, economics, and empirical sciences that deal with philosophical problems. Philosophical Readings uses a policy of blind review by at least two consultants to evaluate articles accepted for serious consideration. Philosophical Readings promotes special issues on particular topics of special relevance in the philosophical debates. Philosophical Readings occasionally has opportunities for Guest Editors for special issues of the journal. Anyone who has an idea for a special issue and would like that idea to be considered, should contact the Executive editor. Philosophical Readings publishes at least 9 original researches in a calendar year.