文化认同会促进合作吗?——民国时期商业文化对董事会和银行合作的影响

0 ECONOMICS
Lingyu Kong, Cheng Cheng, Wenxiao Wang
{"title":"文化认同会促进合作吗?——民国时期商业文化对董事会和银行合作的影响","authors":"Lingyu Kong,&nbsp;Cheng Cheng,&nbsp;Wenxiao Wang","doi":"10.1111/aehr.12271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper studies the impact of cultural integration on business cooperation in the Republican Era. We collect the composition of bank boards and directors' biographical details of 28 principal banks in China, compiling a panel dataset from 1921 to 1936. The data allows us to classify directors' merchant groups, a typical cultural reflection, thereby calculating the cultural difference at the bank-pair level. Using the boards' cultural traits, we find cultural difference among bank boards is negatively related to their director-sharing decisions, an indicator of inter-bank cooperation. Also, cultural identity on boards facilitates banks to participate in loan syndicates with the yield and risk shared. Further composition tests show that cultural attitude towards clan orientation, trust and open spirit embedded in the business culture is the root of inter-banking cooperation. The finding reveals the importance of informal institutions in financial development and contributes to the debate on cultural and institutional bifurcation between China and Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":100132,"journal":{"name":"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review","volume":"63 2","pages":"166-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does cultural identity facilitate cooperation?—Impact of business culture on boards and bank cooperation in Republican China\",\"authors\":\"Lingyu Kong,&nbsp;Cheng Cheng,&nbsp;Wenxiao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aehr.12271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper studies the impact of cultural integration on business cooperation in the Republican Era. We collect the composition of bank boards and directors' biographical details of 28 principal banks in China, compiling a panel dataset from 1921 to 1936. The data allows us to classify directors' merchant groups, a typical cultural reflection, thereby calculating the cultural difference at the bank-pair level. Using the boards' cultural traits, we find cultural difference among bank boards is negatively related to their director-sharing decisions, an indicator of inter-bank cooperation. Also, cultural identity on boards facilitates banks to participate in loan syndicates with the yield and risk shared. Further composition tests show that cultural attitude towards clan orientation, trust and open spirit embedded in the business culture is the root of inter-banking cooperation. The finding reveals the importance of informal institutions in financial development and contributes to the debate on cultural and institutional bifurcation between China and Europe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review\",\"volume\":\"63 2\",\"pages\":\"166-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aehr.12271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia‐Pacific Economic History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aehr.12271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究民国时期文化融合对商业合作的影响。我们收集了中国28家主要银行的董事会组成和董事履历细节,编制了1921年至1936年的面板数据集。数据允许我们对董事的商人群体进行分类,这是一种典型的文化反映,从而计算银行对层面的文化差异。利用董事会文化特征,我们发现银行董事会文化差异与董事分享决策负相关,董事分享决策是银行间合作的一个指标。此外,董事会的文化认同有助于银行参与银团贷款,分担收益和风险。进一步的成分检验表明,企业文化中所蕴含的宗族取向的文化态度、信任和开放精神是银行同业合作的根源。这一发现揭示了非正式机构在金融发展中的重要性,并为中欧之间关于文化和制度分歧的辩论做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does cultural identity facilitate cooperation?—Impact of business culture on boards and bank cooperation in Republican China

This paper studies the impact of cultural integration on business cooperation in the Republican Era. We collect the composition of bank boards and directors' biographical details of 28 principal banks in China, compiling a panel dataset from 1921 to 1936. The data allows us to classify directors' merchant groups, a typical cultural reflection, thereby calculating the cultural difference at the bank-pair level. Using the boards' cultural traits, we find cultural difference among bank boards is negatively related to their director-sharing decisions, an indicator of inter-bank cooperation. Also, cultural identity on boards facilitates banks to participate in loan syndicates with the yield and risk shared. Further composition tests show that cultural attitude towards clan orientation, trust and open spirit embedded in the business culture is the root of inter-banking cooperation. The finding reveals the importance of informal institutions in financial development and contributes to the debate on cultural and institutional bifurcation between China and Europe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信