基于FPGA设计的测试集缩减混合压缩方案的验证

A. R. Khatri
{"title":"基于FPGA设计的测试集缩减混合压缩方案的验证","authors":"A. R. Khatri","doi":"10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.1.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, the density and intricacy of Very Large-Scale Integration (VLSI) circuits are grown, and the number of test vectors has increased drastically. Owing to this, the cost of testing is a significant component for consideration. The two main factors that measure the cost of the test are the size of the test vector sets and test data volume. Compression and compaction are the two approaches used to reduce the aforementioned factors. Compaction is a primary process in the test generation procedure, and there are two classes for it, i.e., dynamic and static compaction approaches. In this paper, the author performs testing and obtains the compact test vectors for various FPGA-based designs. The RASP-FIT fault injection testing tool provides the ATPG testing framework. In this paper, the testing is performed on various FPGA benchmark designs written in Verilog HDL, and the results are validated. The ATPG method developed under the RASP-FIT tool contains new hybrid compaction techniques that calculate compaction and fault coverage for the designs. This work is also compared with the previous work and found that the proposed compaction scheme is better at compacting the test vectors.","PeriodicalId":15926,"journal":{"name":"湖南大学学报(自然科学版)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Proposed Test Set Reduction Hybrid Compaction Schemes for FPGA-Based Designs\",\"authors\":\"A. R. Khatri\",\"doi\":\"10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.1.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, the density and intricacy of Very Large-Scale Integration (VLSI) circuits are grown, and the number of test vectors has increased drastically. Owing to this, the cost of testing is a significant component for consideration. The two main factors that measure the cost of the test are the size of the test vector sets and test data volume. Compression and compaction are the two approaches used to reduce the aforementioned factors. Compaction is a primary process in the test generation procedure, and there are two classes for it, i.e., dynamic and static compaction approaches. In this paper, the author performs testing and obtains the compact test vectors for various FPGA-based designs. The RASP-FIT fault injection testing tool provides the ATPG testing framework. In this paper, the testing is performed on various FPGA benchmark designs written in Verilog HDL, and the results are validated. The ATPG method developed under the RASP-FIT tool contains new hybrid compaction techniques that calculate compaction and fault coverage for the designs. This work is also compared with the previous work and found that the proposed compaction scheme is better at compacting the test vectors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"湖南大学学报(自然科学版)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"湖南大学学报(自然科学版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.1.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"湖南大学学报(自然科学版)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55463/issn.1674-2974.50.1.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,超大规模集成电路的密度和复杂性不断增加,测试矢量的数量急剧增加。因此,测试成本是一个需要考虑的重要组成部分。衡量测试成本的两个主要因素是测试向量集的大小和测试数据量。压缩和压实是用于减少上述因素的两种方法。压实是测试生成过程中的一个主要过程,有两类,即动态压实和静态压实方法。在本文中,作者对各种基于FPGA的设计进行了测试并获得了紧凑的测试向量。RASP-FIT故障注入测试工具提供了ATPG测试框架。本文对用Verilog HDL编写的各种FPGA基准设计进行了测试,并对结果进行了验证。在RASP-FIT工具下开发的ATPG方法包含新的混合压实技术,用于计算设计的压实度和故障覆盖率。该工作还与以前的工作进行了比较,发现所提出的压实方案在压实测试向量方面更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of Proposed Test Set Reduction Hybrid Compaction Schemes for FPGA-Based Designs
Recently, the density and intricacy of Very Large-Scale Integration (VLSI) circuits are grown, and the number of test vectors has increased drastically. Owing to this, the cost of testing is a significant component for consideration. The two main factors that measure the cost of the test are the size of the test vector sets and test data volume. Compression and compaction are the two approaches used to reduce the aforementioned factors. Compaction is a primary process in the test generation procedure, and there are two classes for it, i.e., dynamic and static compaction approaches. In this paper, the author performs testing and obtains the compact test vectors for various FPGA-based designs. The RASP-FIT fault injection testing tool provides the ATPG testing framework. In this paper, the testing is performed on various FPGA benchmark designs written in Verilog HDL, and the results are validated. The ATPG method developed under the RASP-FIT tool contains new hybrid compaction techniques that calculate compaction and fault coverage for the designs. This work is also compared with the previous work and found that the proposed compaction scheme is better at compacting the test vectors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7139
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信