{"title":"土地上的伤痕:美国南方奴隶制的环境史","authors":"K. Jones","doi":"10.1080/14664658.2022.2161449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"from, white Europe. Despite Verney’s insights into the American imperial machine, the benefits of this system for white people are little explicated. Sometimes the discussion hints at middleand upperclass enthusiasm for imperialism, though beyond exploring popular engagement Verney does not extrapolate the economic rewards of empire for these classes and is comfortable with leaning on his bibliography for such claims. More could also be said on competing conceptions of empire within the United States. The culmination of Verney’s account tells us how the U.S. secured the respect of other imperial nations, particularly through Arctic exploration and the search for Sir John Franklin, but there is little acknowledgement of dissent, at times tantalizingly hinted at, against a U.S. eager to spread its mastery across the globe. What is nonetheless clear, whatever refuge one took in empire, it was only available to those who were white, and though Verney explores various imperial motivations there emerges a shared and dynamic framework that made sense of the world through a white gaze. Whether the pretensions were genteel or democratic, scientific or commercial, proslavery or antislavery, Verney’s account of antebellum maritime exploration offers a novel and intriguing investigation into an American collective imagination that was fundamentally imperial.","PeriodicalId":41829,"journal":{"name":"American Nineteenth Century History","volume":"23 1","pages":"312 - 313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scars on the Land: An Environmental History of Slavery in the American South\",\"authors\":\"K. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14664658.2022.2161449\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"from, white Europe. Despite Verney’s insights into the American imperial machine, the benefits of this system for white people are little explicated. Sometimes the discussion hints at middleand upperclass enthusiasm for imperialism, though beyond exploring popular engagement Verney does not extrapolate the economic rewards of empire for these classes and is comfortable with leaning on his bibliography for such claims. More could also be said on competing conceptions of empire within the United States. The culmination of Verney’s account tells us how the U.S. secured the respect of other imperial nations, particularly through Arctic exploration and the search for Sir John Franklin, but there is little acknowledgement of dissent, at times tantalizingly hinted at, against a U.S. eager to spread its mastery across the globe. What is nonetheless clear, whatever refuge one took in empire, it was only available to those who were white, and though Verney explores various imperial motivations there emerges a shared and dynamic framework that made sense of the world through a white gaze. Whether the pretensions were genteel or democratic, scientific or commercial, proslavery or antislavery, Verney’s account of antebellum maritime exploration offers a novel and intriguing investigation into an American collective imagination that was fundamentally imperial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Nineteenth Century History\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"312 - 313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Nineteenth Century History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14664658.2022.2161449\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Nineteenth Century History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14664658.2022.2161449","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
来自白色欧洲。尽管Verney对美国的帝国机器有深刻的见解,但这种制度对白人的好处却很少被阐明。有时,讨论暗示了中上层阶级对帝国主义的热情,尽管除了探索大众参与之外,Verney并没有推断帝国对这些阶级的经济回报,并且很乐意依靠他的参考书目来证明这种说法。在美国内部,关于帝国的不同概念也有很多可说的。凡尼的故事的高潮部分告诉我们,美国是如何获得其他帝国主义国家的尊重的,尤其是通过北极探险和寻找约翰·富兰克林爵士(Sir John Franklin),但书中几乎没有承认反对美国渴望在全球范围内扩张其统治地位的异议,这些异议有时会引人入胜地暗示出来。尽管如此,显而易见的是,无论一个人在帝国中得到了什么庇护,它只适用于那些白人,尽管凡尼探索了各种帝国动机,但还是出现了一个共享的、动态的框架,通过白人的目光来理解世界。无论这些主张是文雅的还是民主的,是科学的还是商业的,是支持奴隶制的还是反对奴隶制的,凡尼对战前海上探险的描述,都为美国人的集体想象提供了一种新颖而有趣的调查,这种想象基本上是帝国主义的。
Scars on the Land: An Environmental History of Slavery in the American South
from, white Europe. Despite Verney’s insights into the American imperial machine, the benefits of this system for white people are little explicated. Sometimes the discussion hints at middleand upperclass enthusiasm for imperialism, though beyond exploring popular engagement Verney does not extrapolate the economic rewards of empire for these classes and is comfortable with leaning on his bibliography for such claims. More could also be said on competing conceptions of empire within the United States. The culmination of Verney’s account tells us how the U.S. secured the respect of other imperial nations, particularly through Arctic exploration and the search for Sir John Franklin, but there is little acknowledgement of dissent, at times tantalizingly hinted at, against a U.S. eager to spread its mastery across the globe. What is nonetheless clear, whatever refuge one took in empire, it was only available to those who were white, and though Verney explores various imperial motivations there emerges a shared and dynamic framework that made sense of the world through a white gaze. Whether the pretensions were genteel or democratic, scientific or commercial, proslavery or antislavery, Verney’s account of antebellum maritime exploration offers a novel and intriguing investigation into an American collective imagination that was fundamentally imperial.