{"title":"工作讨论:应用Bick婴儿观察法的思考","authors":"Trudy Klauber","doi":"10.1080/13698036.2021.2026653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I recently had the opportunity to re-visit the task of Work Discussion when I was invited to lead a study day for the first and second-year students of a Psychoanalytic Observational Studies Course. Sadly, because of the resurgence of Covid-19, the whole day, like so many in the past two years, had to take place on Zoom. The invitation and the preparatory reading stimulated the enthusiasm I have always felt for this application of Esther Bick’s infant observation method. It led me to re-read a number of other things, including initially, re-visiting the description of the aims and scope of this journal (https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/riob), the first chapter of the book, Work discussion: learning from reflective practice in work with children and families written by Jonathan Bradley and Margaret Rustin (2018), a paper on consultation in schools written by Martha Harris in 1967, and a paper of my own about using observation in the work setting written for a special issue of this Journal (Klauber, 1999). I want here just to pause to remind readers of the aims and scope of this journal, according to our website:","PeriodicalId":38553,"journal":{"name":"Infant Observation","volume":"24 1","pages":"87 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work discussion: thoughts on an application of the Bick infant observation method\",\"authors\":\"Trudy Klauber\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13698036.2021.2026653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I recently had the opportunity to re-visit the task of Work Discussion when I was invited to lead a study day for the first and second-year students of a Psychoanalytic Observational Studies Course. Sadly, because of the resurgence of Covid-19, the whole day, like so many in the past two years, had to take place on Zoom. The invitation and the preparatory reading stimulated the enthusiasm I have always felt for this application of Esther Bick’s infant observation method. It led me to re-read a number of other things, including initially, re-visiting the description of the aims and scope of this journal (https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/riob), the first chapter of the book, Work discussion: learning from reflective practice in work with children and families written by Jonathan Bradley and Margaret Rustin (2018), a paper on consultation in schools written by Martha Harris in 1967, and a paper of my own about using observation in the work setting written for a special issue of this Journal (Klauber, 1999). I want here just to pause to remind readers of the aims and scope of this journal, according to our website:\",\"PeriodicalId\":38553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infant Observation\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"87 - 91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infant Observation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698036.2021.2026653\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Observation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698036.2021.2026653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近,我有机会再次访问工作讨论的任务,当时我被邀请为心理分析观察研究课程的一年级和二年级学生主持一个学习日。遗憾的是,由于新冠肺炎的卷土重来,与过去两年的许多活动一样,全天都不得不在Zoom上进行。邀请和准备阅读激发了我一直以来对埃丝特·比克婴儿观察方法应用的热情。这让我重新阅读了许多其他内容,包括最初重新阅读了对本杂志目标和范围的描述(https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/riob),乔纳森·布拉德利(Jonathan Bradley)和玛格丽特·鲁斯廷(Margaret Rustin)(2018)撰写的《工作讨论:从儿童和家庭工作中的反思实践中学习》(Work discussion:learning from reflective practice in Work with children and family)一书的第一章,玛莎·哈里斯(Martha Harris。根据我们的网站,我想在这里停下来提醒读者这本杂志的目的和范围:
Work discussion: thoughts on an application of the Bick infant observation method
I recently had the opportunity to re-visit the task of Work Discussion when I was invited to lead a study day for the first and second-year students of a Psychoanalytic Observational Studies Course. Sadly, because of the resurgence of Covid-19, the whole day, like so many in the past two years, had to take place on Zoom. The invitation and the preparatory reading stimulated the enthusiasm I have always felt for this application of Esther Bick’s infant observation method. It led me to re-read a number of other things, including initially, re-visiting the description of the aims and scope of this journal (https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/riob), the first chapter of the book, Work discussion: learning from reflective practice in work with children and families written by Jonathan Bradley and Margaret Rustin (2018), a paper on consultation in schools written by Martha Harris in 1967, and a paper of my own about using observation in the work setting written for a special issue of this Journal (Klauber, 1999). I want here just to pause to remind readers of the aims and scope of this journal, according to our website: