主观办公室转介对学校纪律中种族不均衡的相对贡献

E. Girvan, Cody Gion, K. McIntosh, K. Smolkowski
{"title":"主观办公室转介对学校纪律中种族不均衡的相对贡献","authors":"E. Girvan, Cody Gion, K. McIntosh, K. Smolkowski","doi":"10.1037/spq0000178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To improve our understanding of where to target interventions, the study examined the extent to which school discipline disproportionality between African American and White students was attributable to racial disparities in teachers’ discretionary versus nondiscretionary decisions. The sample consisted of office discipline referral (ODR) records for 1,154,686 students enrolled in 1,824 U.S. schools. Analyses compared the relative contributions of disproportionality in ODRs for subjectively and objectively defined behaviors to overall disproportionality, controlling for relevant school characteristics. Results showed that disproportionality in subjective ODRs explained the vast majority of variance in total disproportionality. These findings suggest that providing educators with strategies to neutralize the effects of implicit bias, which is known to influence discretionary decisions and interpretations of ambiguous behaviors, may be a promising avenue for achieving equity in school discipline.","PeriodicalId":48005,"journal":{"name":"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"203","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relative Contribution of Subjective Office Referrals to Racial Disproportionality in School Discipline\",\"authors\":\"E. Girvan, Cody Gion, K. McIntosh, K. Smolkowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/spq0000178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To improve our understanding of where to target interventions, the study examined the extent to which school discipline disproportionality between African American and White students was attributable to racial disparities in teachers’ discretionary versus nondiscretionary decisions. The sample consisted of office discipline referral (ODR) records for 1,154,686 students enrolled in 1,824 U.S. schools. Analyses compared the relative contributions of disproportionality in ODRs for subjectively and objectively defined behaviors to overall disproportionality, controlling for relevant school characteristics. Results showed that disproportionality in subjective ODRs explained the vast majority of variance in total disproportionality. These findings suggest that providing educators with strategies to neutralize the effects of implicit bias, which is known to influence discretionary decisions and interpretations of ambiguous behaviors, may be a promising avenue for achieving equity in school discipline.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"203\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 203

摘要

为了提高我们对干预目标的理解,该研究考察了非裔美国人和白人学生之间的学校纪律不均衡在多大程度上归因于教师在自由裁量和非自由裁量决策方面的种族差异。样本包括1824所美国学校的1154686名学生的办公室学科推荐(ODR)记录。分析比较了主观和客观定义行为的ODR中的不均衡性与总体不均衡性的相对贡献,控制了相关的学校特征。结果表明,主观ODR的不均衡性解释了总不均衡性的绝大多数方差。这些发现表明,为教育工作者提供消除隐性偏见影响的策略,可能是实现学校纪律公平的一条很有前途的途径。众所周知,隐性偏见会影响自主决策和对模糊行为的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relative Contribution of Subjective Office Referrals to Racial Disproportionality in School Discipline
To improve our understanding of where to target interventions, the study examined the extent to which school discipline disproportionality between African American and White students was attributable to racial disparities in teachers’ discretionary versus nondiscretionary decisions. The sample consisted of office discipline referral (ODR) records for 1,154,686 students enrolled in 1,824 U.S. schools. Analyses compared the relative contributions of disproportionality in ODRs for subjectively and objectively defined behaviors to overall disproportionality, controlling for relevant school characteristics. Results showed that disproportionality in subjective ODRs explained the vast majority of variance in total disproportionality. These findings suggest that providing educators with strategies to neutralize the effects of implicit bias, which is known to influence discretionary decisions and interpretations of ambiguous behaviors, may be a promising avenue for achieving equity in school discipline.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The flagship scholarly journal in the field of school psychology, the journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical analyses, and literature reviews encompassing a full range of methodologies and orientations, including educational, cognitive, social, cognitive behavioral, preventive, dynamic, multicultural, and organizational psychology. Focusing primarily on children, youth, and the adults who serve them, School Psychology Quarterly publishes information pertaining to populations across the life span.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信