社会资本与韩国信息网络社会:互联网使用者与非互联网使用者是否有显著差异?

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Seong-Ho Lim, Kyongjae Song
{"title":"社会资本与韩国信息网络社会:互联网使用者与非互联网使用者是否有显著差异?","authors":"Seong-Ho Lim, Kyongjae Song","doi":"10.29152/koiks.2019.50.3.419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Do ICTs bring precious momentum and consolidation to social capital, or do they rather inflict a damaging blow? This question has fueled the alarmist/optimist debate. This article intends to enrich the debate by exploring the question in the South Korean context. Our analyses resulted in complex and mixed messages. Internet-users showed a higher level of social trust than non-users, but the two groups did not reveal particularly outstanding differences in other social capital-related components. It is therefore difficult to take a clear and definitive position on whether the relationship between ICT and social capital is positive or negative. This murky picture in South Korea suggests that the alarmist/optimist debate may be too simplistic. Future discussion thus requires more in-depth interpretations on specific contexts before generalizations can be made regarding the issue of social capital in the information network society.","PeriodicalId":43950,"journal":{"name":"Korea Observer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Capital and the Information Network Society in South Korea: Do Internet Users and Non-Users Significantly Differ?\",\"authors\":\"Seong-Ho Lim, Kyongjae Song\",\"doi\":\"10.29152/koiks.2019.50.3.419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Do ICTs bring precious momentum and consolidation to social capital, or do they rather inflict a damaging blow? This question has fueled the alarmist/optimist debate. This article intends to enrich the debate by exploring the question in the South Korean context. Our analyses resulted in complex and mixed messages. Internet-users showed a higher level of social trust than non-users, but the two groups did not reveal particularly outstanding differences in other social capital-related components. It is therefore difficult to take a clear and definitive position on whether the relationship between ICT and social capital is positive or negative. This murky picture in South Korea suggests that the alarmist/optimist debate may be too simplistic. Future discussion thus requires more in-depth interpretations on specific contexts before generalizations can be made regarding the issue of social capital in the information network society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korea Observer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korea Observer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29152/koiks.2019.50.3.419\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea Observer","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29152/koiks.2019.50.3.419","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

信息和通信技术是给社会资本带来了宝贵的动力和巩固,还是造成了破坏性的打击?这个问题引发了危言耸听/乐观主义的争论。本文旨在通过在韩国背景下探讨这一问题来丰富辩论。我们的分析得出了复杂而混杂的信息。网民表现出比非网民更高的社会信任水平,但两组在其他社会资本相关成分上没有表现出特别突出的差异。因此,对于信息和通信技术与社会资本之间的关系是积极的还是消极的,很难采取明确和明确的立场。韩国的这种模糊景象表明,危言耸听/乐观主义的辩论可能过于简单化了。因此,在对信息网络社会中的社会资本问题进行概括之前,未来的讨论需要对具体背景进行更深入的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Capital and the Information Network Society in South Korea: Do Internet Users and Non-Users Significantly Differ?
Do ICTs bring precious momentum and consolidation to social capital, or do they rather inflict a damaging blow? This question has fueled the alarmist/optimist debate. This article intends to enrich the debate by exploring the question in the South Korean context. Our analyses resulted in complex and mixed messages. Internet-users showed a higher level of social trust than non-users, but the two groups did not reveal particularly outstanding differences in other social capital-related components. It is therefore difficult to take a clear and definitive position on whether the relationship between ICT and social capital is positive or negative. This murky picture in South Korea suggests that the alarmist/optimist debate may be too simplistic. Future discussion thus requires more in-depth interpretations on specific contexts before generalizations can be made regarding the issue of social capital in the information network society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korea Observer
Korea Observer Multiple-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The「KOREA OBSERVER」, an English quarterly journal, has been published by THE INSTITUTE OF KOREAN STUDIES since 1968. The research articles are contributed by scholars and experts on various subjects, such as Korean political, economic, social, and cultural issues, as well as Korean unification, North Korea, and Korea’s foreign relations. The「KOREA OBSERVER」is peer-reviewed journal and maintains its high quality standards. The Journal is distributed to the libraries, academic institutions, research institutes, and individuals over 160 countries in the world. It is indexed by the PAIS International, UMI, Ingenta and International Bibliography of the Social Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信