西班牙语生成性量表的因子效度:另一个具有方法效应的量表?

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
D. García-Romero, I. Fernández, J. Tomás, Consuelo Cerviño Vásquez, Sylvia Georgieva
{"title":"西班牙语生成性量表的因子效度:另一个具有方法效应的量表?","authors":"D. García-Romero, I. Fernández, J. Tomás, Consuelo Cerviño Vásquez, Sylvia Georgieva","doi":"10.16925/PE.V13I22.1984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The term “generativity” was used for the first time by Erikson (1950). It refers to the state of adulthood in the life cycle, which implies procreativity, productivity and creativity, it also impulses the development of one’s own identity. There are several waysto measure generativity such as interviews, direct observation, case studies, or self-report questionnaires. The most widely used method is self-report, and among the available scales, the Loyola Generativity Scale (LGS) is one of the salient scales. lgs is a self-report measure composed of twenty items that measure a general factor of generativity.Objective: This study examined the factorial validity and internal consistency of the adaptation of the Loyola Generativity Scale to Spanish for its use with Dominican teachers.Method: Two competitive factor models were tested based on previous existing literature,and a third model with method effects associated to negatively worded items was added, in order to find the best fitting solution for this sample. In order to examine the factorial validity of the three models, three Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were performed,and internal consistency and composite reliability indices were also calculated.Results: In general, the three models showed good psychometric properties. However, the third model that considered a general factor of generativity together with a method effect factor showed the best fit for this sample.Conclusion: Implications for an adequate measurement of generativity are discussed. More research is needed to examine if these properties are stable on different samples from different populations.","PeriodicalId":53843,"journal":{"name":"Pensando Psicologia","volume":"13 1","pages":"5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validez factorial de una escala de generatividad en español: ¿otra escala con efectos de método?\",\"authors\":\"D. García-Romero, I. Fernández, J. Tomás, Consuelo Cerviño Vásquez, Sylvia Georgieva\",\"doi\":\"10.16925/PE.V13I22.1984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The term “generativity” was used for the first time by Erikson (1950). It refers to the state of adulthood in the life cycle, which implies procreativity, productivity and creativity, it also impulses the development of one’s own identity. There are several waysto measure generativity such as interviews, direct observation, case studies, or self-report questionnaires. The most widely used method is self-report, and among the available scales, the Loyola Generativity Scale (LGS) is one of the salient scales. lgs is a self-report measure composed of twenty items that measure a general factor of generativity.Objective: This study examined the factorial validity and internal consistency of the adaptation of the Loyola Generativity Scale to Spanish for its use with Dominican teachers.Method: Two competitive factor models were tested based on previous existing literature,and a third model with method effects associated to negatively worded items was added, in order to find the best fitting solution for this sample. In order to examine the factorial validity of the three models, three Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were performed,and internal consistency and composite reliability indices were also calculated.Results: In general, the three models showed good psychometric properties. However, the third model that considered a general factor of generativity together with a method effect factor showed the best fit for this sample.Conclusion: Implications for an adequate measurement of generativity are discussed. More research is needed to examine if these properties are stable on different samples from different populations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pensando Psicologia\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"5-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pensando Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16925/PE.V13I22.1984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pensando Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16925/PE.V13I22.1984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

引言:“生成”一词是由埃里克森(Erikson, 1950)首次使用的。它指的是生命周期中的成年状态,这意味着生育能力、生产力和创造力,它也推动了一个人自我认同的发展。有几种方法可以衡量创造性,如访谈、直接观察、案例研究或自我报告问卷。使用最广泛的方法是自我报告,在现有的量表中,洛约拉生成量表(LGS)是一个突出的量表。LGS是一种自我报告测量,由20个项目组成,测量一般的生成因素。目的:本研究考察了洛约拉生成量表在多米尼加教师中对西班牙语适应性的析因效度和内部一致性。方法:在已有文献的基础上,对两个竞争因素模型进行检验,并在此基础上增加与负性词语相关的方法效应的第三个模型,以寻找本样本的最佳拟合解。为了检验三个模型的因子效度,我们进行了三个验证性因子分析(Confirmatory Factor Analysis, CFA),并计算了内部一致性和复合信度指标。结果:三种模型总体上表现出较好的心理测量特性。然而,第三个模型考虑了一个一般因素的生成和一个方法影响因素显示出最适合这个样本。结论:对生育能力的适当测量的意义进行了讨论。需要更多的研究来检验这些特性在不同人群的不同样本上是否稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validez factorial de una escala de generatividad en español: ¿otra escala con efectos de método?
Introduction: The term “generativity” was used for the first time by Erikson (1950). It refers to the state of adulthood in the life cycle, which implies procreativity, productivity and creativity, it also impulses the development of one’s own identity. There are several waysto measure generativity such as interviews, direct observation, case studies, or self-report questionnaires. The most widely used method is self-report, and among the available scales, the Loyola Generativity Scale (LGS) is one of the salient scales. lgs is a self-report measure composed of twenty items that measure a general factor of generativity.Objective: This study examined the factorial validity and internal consistency of the adaptation of the Loyola Generativity Scale to Spanish for its use with Dominican teachers.Method: Two competitive factor models were tested based on previous existing literature,and a third model with method effects associated to negatively worded items was added, in order to find the best fitting solution for this sample. In order to examine the factorial validity of the three models, three Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were performed,and internal consistency and composite reliability indices were also calculated.Results: In general, the three models showed good psychometric properties. However, the third model that considered a general factor of generativity together with a method effect factor showed the best fit for this sample.Conclusion: Implications for an adequate measurement of generativity are discussed. More research is needed to examine if these properties are stable on different samples from different populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pensando Psicologia
Pensando Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信