为竞争损害索赔和辩护辩护:上诉法院和竞争上诉法庭最近的指导意见

Q4 Social Sciences
Matt Hughes, Elaine A. Whiteford
{"title":"为竞争损害索赔和辩护辩护:上诉法院和竞争上诉法庭最近的指导意见","authors":"Matt Hughes, Elaine A. Whiteford","doi":"10.4337/clj.2022.04.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Court of Appeal and the Competition Appeal Tribunal have recently handed down guidance in NTN v. Stellantis and O’Higgins and Evans, as to the requirements that must be satisfied to plead a competition law claim or defence, whether the claim is an individual claim or a collective action. This article considers the economic and legal issues that need to be addressed in pleadings, in the light of that guidance. Both judgments make clear that economists must be consulted at the very earliest stage to ensure that the pleadings, whether a claim or defence, or in an individual claim or a collective action, reflect clearly the economic theories relied upon and do so by reference to underlying facts. If a pleading does not comply with this guidance, it risks being struck out.","PeriodicalId":36415,"journal":{"name":"Competition Law Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pleading competition damages claims and defences: recent guidance from the Court of Appeal and the Competition Appeal Tribunal\",\"authors\":\"Matt Hughes, Elaine A. Whiteford\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/clj.2022.04.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Court of Appeal and the Competition Appeal Tribunal have recently handed down guidance in NTN v. Stellantis and O’Higgins and Evans, as to the requirements that must be satisfied to plead a competition law claim or defence, whether the claim is an individual claim or a collective action. This article considers the economic and legal issues that need to be addressed in pleadings, in the light of that guidance. Both judgments make clear that economists must be consulted at the very earliest stage to ensure that the pleadings, whether a claim or defence, or in an individual claim or a collective action, reflect clearly the economic theories relied upon and do so by reference to underlying facts. If a pleading does not comply with this guidance, it risks being struck out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Competition Law Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Competition Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2022.04.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Competition Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/clj.2022.04.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上诉法院和竞争上诉审裁处最近在NTN v. Stellantis和O 'Higgins and Evans案中就竞争法索赔或抗辩必须满足的要求(无论索赔是个人索赔还是集体诉讼)发布了指导意见。本文根据该指导意见,考虑在诉状中需要处理的经济和法律问题。这两项判决都清楚地表明,必须在最早的阶段咨询经济学家,以确保诉状,无论是索赔还是辩护,无论是个人索赔还是集体诉讼,都能清楚地反映所依赖的经济理论,并通过参考基本事实来做到这一点。如果一项辩护不符合这一指导原则,就有可能被驳回。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pleading competition damages claims and defences: recent guidance from the Court of Appeal and the Competition Appeal Tribunal
The Court of Appeal and the Competition Appeal Tribunal have recently handed down guidance in NTN v. Stellantis and O’Higgins and Evans, as to the requirements that must be satisfied to plead a competition law claim or defence, whether the claim is an individual claim or a collective action. This article considers the economic and legal issues that need to be addressed in pleadings, in the light of that guidance. Both judgments make clear that economists must be consulted at the very earliest stage to ensure that the pleadings, whether a claim or defence, or in an individual claim or a collective action, reflect clearly the economic theories relied upon and do so by reference to underlying facts. If a pleading does not comply with this guidance, it risks being struck out.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Competition Law Journal
Competition Law Journal Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信