医院方案修订后限制万古霉素负荷剂量对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者的影响

IF 0.8 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Hospital Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-27 DOI:10.1177/00185787231196435
Alec R Raley, Matthew L Brown, Morgan Frawley, Robert A Oster, William Seth Edwards
{"title":"医院方案修订后限制万古霉素负荷剂量对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者的影响","authors":"Alec R Raley, Matthew L Brown, Morgan Frawley, Robert A Oster, William Seth Edwards","doi":"10.1177/00185787231196435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Vancomycin loading doses are commonly used to quickly attain target serum concentrations; however, data supporting their effect on clinical patient outcomes is limited. In April 2020, our institution revised our pharmacist-driven vancomycin dosing protocol to reserve loading doses for hemodynamically unstable patients with suspected serious methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) infections. Prior to the protocol update, all patients treated with vancomycin at our institution received a weight-based loading dose. The purpose of this study is to assess clinical efficacy and safety outcomes related to the use of vancomycin loading doses. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective, quasi-experimental study was performed to compare clinical outcomes in adult patients treated with vancomycin for laboratory-confirmed MRSA infections. Patients who received vancomycin therapy prior to our institution's vancomycin dosing protocol revisions (pre-intervention) were compared to patients who received vancomycin after the revisions (post-intervention). The primary outcome was all-cause, inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes included persistent signs and symptoms of infection ≥5 days after vancomycin initiation, switch to alternative anti-MRSA therapy, and nephrotoxicity. <b>Results:</b> A total of 122 patients (63 pre-intervention patients and 59 post-intervention patients) were included. Receipt of a vancomycin loading dose did not impact the rate of inpatient mortality (4.76%vs 6.78%; OR 1.46, 95% CI [0.31, 6.79]). All secondary outcomes were similar between the two groups, including persistent signs and symptoms of infection, switch to alternative anti-MRSA therapy, and nephrotoxicity. <b>Conclusions:</b> Routine use of vancomycin loading doses is not associated with improved outcomes in hemodynamically stable patients with MRSA infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Limiting Vancomycin Loading Doses in Patients With Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Infections After Hospital Protocol Revision.\",\"authors\":\"Alec R Raley, Matthew L Brown, Morgan Frawley, Robert A Oster, William Seth Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00185787231196435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Vancomycin loading doses are commonly used to quickly attain target serum concentrations; however, data supporting their effect on clinical patient outcomes is limited. In April 2020, our institution revised our pharmacist-driven vancomycin dosing protocol to reserve loading doses for hemodynamically unstable patients with suspected serious methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) infections. Prior to the protocol update, all patients treated with vancomycin at our institution received a weight-based loading dose. The purpose of this study is to assess clinical efficacy and safety outcomes related to the use of vancomycin loading doses. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective, quasi-experimental study was performed to compare clinical outcomes in adult patients treated with vancomycin for laboratory-confirmed MRSA infections. Patients who received vancomycin therapy prior to our institution's vancomycin dosing protocol revisions (pre-intervention) were compared to patients who received vancomycin after the revisions (post-intervention). The primary outcome was all-cause, inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes included persistent signs and symptoms of infection ≥5 days after vancomycin initiation, switch to alternative anti-MRSA therapy, and nephrotoxicity. <b>Results:</b> A total of 122 patients (63 pre-intervention patients and 59 post-intervention patients) were included. Receipt of a vancomycin loading dose did not impact the rate of inpatient mortality (4.76%vs 6.78%; OR 1.46, 95% CI [0.31, 6.79]). All secondary outcomes were similar between the two groups, including persistent signs and symptoms of infection, switch to alternative anti-MRSA therapy, and nephrotoxicity. <b>Conclusions:</b> Routine use of vancomycin loading doses is not associated with improved outcomes in hemodynamically stable patients with MRSA infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10786050/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231196435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787231196435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:万古霉素负荷剂量通常用于快速达到目标血清浓度;然而,支持它们对临床患者预后影响的数据有限。2020年4月,我们修订了药剂师驱动的万古霉素给药方案,为疑似严重耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染的血流动力学不稳定患者保留负荷剂量。在方案更新之前,我们机构所有接受万古霉素治疗的患者都接受了基于体重的负荷剂量。本研究的目的是评估与万古霉素负荷剂量相关的临床疗效和安全性结果。方法:回顾性、准实验研究比较万古霉素治疗实验室确诊的MRSA感染的成年患者的临床结果。在本机构万古霉素给药方案修订前(干预前)接受万古霉素治疗的患者与万古霉素给药方案修订后(干预后)接受万古霉素治疗的患者进行比较。主要结局为全因住院死亡率。次要结局包括万古霉素开始治疗后≥5天感染的持续体征和症状、切换到替代抗mrsa治疗和肾毒性。结果:共纳入122例患者,其中干预前63例,干预后59例。接受万古霉素负荷剂量对住院死亡率没有影响(4.76%vs 6.78%;或1.46,95% ci[0.31, 6.79])。两组之间的所有次要结局相似,包括持续感染的体征和症状,切换到替代抗mrsa治疗和肾毒性。结论:常规使用万古霉素负荷剂量与血流动力学稳定的MRSA感染患者的预后改善无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Limiting Vancomycin Loading Doses in Patients With Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections After Hospital Protocol Revision.

Background: Vancomycin loading doses are commonly used to quickly attain target serum concentrations; however, data supporting their effect on clinical patient outcomes is limited. In April 2020, our institution revised our pharmacist-driven vancomycin dosing protocol to reserve loading doses for hemodynamically unstable patients with suspected serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Prior to the protocol update, all patients treated with vancomycin at our institution received a weight-based loading dose. The purpose of this study is to assess clinical efficacy and safety outcomes related to the use of vancomycin loading doses. Methods: A retrospective, quasi-experimental study was performed to compare clinical outcomes in adult patients treated with vancomycin for laboratory-confirmed MRSA infections. Patients who received vancomycin therapy prior to our institution's vancomycin dosing protocol revisions (pre-intervention) were compared to patients who received vancomycin after the revisions (post-intervention). The primary outcome was all-cause, inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes included persistent signs and symptoms of infection ≥5 days after vancomycin initiation, switch to alternative anti-MRSA therapy, and nephrotoxicity. Results: A total of 122 patients (63 pre-intervention patients and 59 post-intervention patients) were included. Receipt of a vancomycin loading dose did not impact the rate of inpatient mortality (4.76%vs 6.78%; OR 1.46, 95% CI [0.31, 6.79]). All secondary outcomes were similar between the two groups, including persistent signs and symptoms of infection, switch to alternative anti-MRSA therapy, and nephrotoxicity. Conclusions: Routine use of vancomycin loading doses is not associated with improved outcomes in hemodynamically stable patients with MRSA infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信