斯洛伐克为什么不能限制直接支付?政治经济学视角

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS
J. Pokrivčák, Marián Tóth, P. Ciaian, Martin Busík, A. Svorenčík
{"title":"斯洛伐克为什么不能限制直接支付?政治经济学视角","authors":"J. Pokrivčák, Marián Tóth, P. Ciaian, Martin Busík, A. Svorenčík","doi":"10.18267/j.pep.753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Annually the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) provides support to the farming sector amounting to more than EUR 50 billion in the EU, of which direct payments (DPs) take around 70%. DPs are often argued to be granted unfairly to large farms. In this paper we analyse implications and the political economy of DP capping in Slovakia in the context of the ongoing negations about the future CAP reform. The simulation results for Slovakia show that if the 2018 Commission proposal was approved it would lead to losses of EUR 190.1 million (68% of total DPs) to large farms when labour costs are not subtracted. These losses would decrease to only EUR 12.2 million (4.4% of total DPs) when the labour costs are subtracted. Further, the results show that potentially affected large farms in Slovakia show lower performance and lower compliance with the agricultural policy objectives than farms unaffected by the DP capping. Similar to the past CAP reforms, the position of Slovakia against DP capping is expected to be maintained also in future, which could be explained by three main factors: the productivity argument, the political economy argument linked to the lobby pressure from large farms and low economic distortions caused by DPs.","PeriodicalId":45324,"journal":{"name":"Prague Economic Papers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Cannot Direct Payments Be Capped in Slovakia? A Political Economy Perspective\",\"authors\":\"J. Pokrivčák, Marián Tóth, P. Ciaian, Martin Busík, A. Svorenčík\",\"doi\":\"10.18267/j.pep.753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Annually the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) provides support to the farming sector amounting to more than EUR 50 billion in the EU, of which direct payments (DPs) take around 70%. DPs are often argued to be granted unfairly to large farms. In this paper we analyse implications and the political economy of DP capping in Slovakia in the context of the ongoing negations about the future CAP reform. The simulation results for Slovakia show that if the 2018 Commission proposal was approved it would lead to losses of EUR 190.1 million (68% of total DPs) to large farms when labour costs are not subtracted. These losses would decrease to only EUR 12.2 million (4.4% of total DPs) when the labour costs are subtracted. Further, the results show that potentially affected large farms in Slovakia show lower performance and lower compliance with the agricultural policy objectives than farms unaffected by the DP capping. Similar to the past CAP reforms, the position of Slovakia against DP capping is expected to be maintained also in future, which could be explained by three main factors: the productivity argument, the political economy argument linked to the lobby pressure from large farms and low economic distortions caused by DPs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prague Economic Papers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prague Economic Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.753\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prague Economic Papers","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.753","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共同农业政策(CAP)每年为欧盟农业部门提供总额超过500亿欧元的支持,其中直接支付(DP)约占70%。民主党经常被认为被不公平地授予大型农场。在本文中,我们分析了在对未来CAP改革的持续否定的背景下,斯洛伐克DP封顶的影响和政治经济学。斯洛伐克的模拟结果显示,如果2018年委员会提案获得批准,在不扣除劳动力成本的情况下,将导致大型农场损失1.901亿欧元(占DP总额的68%)。减去劳动力成本后,这些损失将降至1220万欧元(占DP总额的4.4%)。此外,结果显示,与未受DP上限影响的农场相比,斯洛伐克潜在受影响的大型农场表现出更低的绩效和对农业政策目标的遵守程度。与过去的CAP改革类似,斯洛伐克反对DP上限的立场预计也将在未来保持,这可以由三个主要因素来解释:生产力论点、与来自大型农场的游说压力有关的政治经济论点以及DP造成的低经济扭曲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Cannot Direct Payments Be Capped in Slovakia? A Political Economy Perspective
Annually the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) provides support to the farming sector amounting to more than EUR 50 billion in the EU, of which direct payments (DPs) take around 70%. DPs are often argued to be granted unfairly to large farms. In this paper we analyse implications and the political economy of DP capping in Slovakia in the context of the ongoing negations about the future CAP reform. The simulation results for Slovakia show that if the 2018 Commission proposal was approved it would lead to losses of EUR 190.1 million (68% of total DPs) to large farms when labour costs are not subtracted. These losses would decrease to only EUR 12.2 million (4.4% of total DPs) when the labour costs are subtracted. Further, the results show that potentially affected large farms in Slovakia show lower performance and lower compliance with the agricultural policy objectives than farms unaffected by the DP capping. Similar to the past CAP reforms, the position of Slovakia against DP capping is expected to be maintained also in future, which could be explained by three main factors: the productivity argument, the political economy argument linked to the lobby pressure from large farms and low economic distortions caused by DPs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信