用回归模型评价印度北部平原四种落叶树种的树干生物量和碳密度

N. A. Mir, Gowher N Parrey, T. A. Rather, H. Bhat
{"title":"用回归模型评价印度北部平原四种落叶树种的树干生物量和碳密度","authors":"N. A. Mir, Gowher N Parrey, T. A. Rather, H. Bhat","doi":"10.9734/BJAST/2017/31829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment of carbon stock in trees is generally based on allometric equations relating either volume, or biomass, or carbon to DBH. The carbon density of different tree parts is not often measured directly, but generally assumed to be 50% of dry weight. In this study we try to analyze those assumptions and determined the effect different regression equations on carbon sequestration for Tectona grandis , Vachellia nilotica , Madhuca indica , Dalbergia sissoo . The present study aims to estimate the above-ground biomass (AGB) and carbon sequestration in 18 sampling plots of 30 × 30 m 2 size, at different sites in northern plains (Uttar Pradesh) India. Two regression models were used for each species; one using DBH only (Method 1) and the other using DBH and height (Method 2). The best fit models were chosen on the basis of highest R 2 . The DBH, AGB and carbon density yielded a positive relationship for all the species. Apart from Model D1h, all R 2 values for models developed with our data (both DBH and height) were above 99%. The R 2 values for models developed with DBH only were below 90%, least for model M1 (77.6%) The co-efficient for DBH was not significant in Model D1h and M1h, but the co-efficient for DBH and height was significant at the 5% level of significance for all other coefficients in all other models. The estimated stem AGB was maximum for Tectona grandis with 376.2 and 355.63 t/tree with carbon sequestration of 621.25 and 587.50 kg/ha for the equation T1 and T2H respectively; whereas minimum AGB was recorded for Dalbergia sisoo with 221.55 and 211.58 t/ha and carbon sequestration of 362.93 and 349.65 kg/ha. The AGB and carbon sequestration estimation obtained in this study represents a more realistic picture of biomass of region.","PeriodicalId":91221,"journal":{"name":"British journal of applied science & technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Stem Biomass and Carbon Density of Four Deciduous Tree Species in Northern Plains of India Using Regression Modeling\",\"authors\":\"N. A. Mir, Gowher N Parrey, T. A. Rather, H. Bhat\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/BJAST/2017/31829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assessment of carbon stock in trees is generally based on allometric equations relating either volume, or biomass, or carbon to DBH. The carbon density of different tree parts is not often measured directly, but generally assumed to be 50% of dry weight. In this study we try to analyze those assumptions and determined the effect different regression equations on carbon sequestration for Tectona grandis , Vachellia nilotica , Madhuca indica , Dalbergia sissoo . The present study aims to estimate the above-ground biomass (AGB) and carbon sequestration in 18 sampling plots of 30 × 30 m 2 size, at different sites in northern plains (Uttar Pradesh) India. Two regression models were used for each species; one using DBH only (Method 1) and the other using DBH and height (Method 2). The best fit models were chosen on the basis of highest R 2 . The DBH, AGB and carbon density yielded a positive relationship for all the species. Apart from Model D1h, all R 2 values for models developed with our data (both DBH and height) were above 99%. The R 2 values for models developed with DBH only were below 90%, least for model M1 (77.6%) The co-efficient for DBH was not significant in Model D1h and M1h, but the co-efficient for DBH and height was significant at the 5% level of significance for all other coefficients in all other models. The estimated stem AGB was maximum for Tectona grandis with 376.2 and 355.63 t/tree with carbon sequestration of 621.25 and 587.50 kg/ha for the equation T1 and T2H respectively; whereas minimum AGB was recorded for Dalbergia sisoo with 221.55 and 211.58 t/ha and carbon sequestration of 362.93 and 349.65 kg/ha. The AGB and carbon sequestration estimation obtained in this study represents a more realistic picture of biomass of region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of applied science & technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of applied science & technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2017/31829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of applied science & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2017/31829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

树木碳储量的评估通常基于与体积或生物量或碳与DBH相关的异速生长方程。不同树木部分的碳密度通常不直接测量,但通常假设为干重的50%。在本研究中,我们试图分析这些假设,并确定了不同的回归方程对柚木、尼罗冬青、印度黄、黄檀固碳的影响。本研究旨在估计印度北部平原(北方邦)不同地点的18个30×30 m2采样点的地上生物量(AGB)和碳固存。每个物种使用两个回归模型;一个仅使用DBH(方法1),另一个使用DBH和高度(方法2)。最佳拟合模型是在R2最高的基础上选择的。DBH、AGB和碳密度对所有物种都产生了正相关。除D1h模型外,用我们的数据开发的模型的所有R2值(包括DBH和高度)都在99%以上。仅使用DBH开发的模型的R2值低于90%,至少对于模型M1(77.6%)。在模型D1h和M1h中,DBH的协同效应不显著,但对于所有其他模型中的所有其他系数,DBH和身高的协同效应在5%的显著性水平上显著。根据方程T1和T2H,柚木的茎干AGB估计值最大,分别为376.2和355.63 t/树,固碳量分别为621.25和587.50 kg/ha;而Dalbergia sisoo的最低AGB记录为221.55和211.58t/ha,碳固存为362.93和349.65kg/ha。本研究中获得的AGB和碳固存估计代表了该地区生物量的更现实的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Stem Biomass and Carbon Density of Four Deciduous Tree Species in Northern Plains of India Using Regression Modeling
Assessment of carbon stock in trees is generally based on allometric equations relating either volume, or biomass, or carbon to DBH. The carbon density of different tree parts is not often measured directly, but generally assumed to be 50% of dry weight. In this study we try to analyze those assumptions and determined the effect different regression equations on carbon sequestration for Tectona grandis , Vachellia nilotica , Madhuca indica , Dalbergia sissoo . The present study aims to estimate the above-ground biomass (AGB) and carbon sequestration in 18 sampling plots of 30 × 30 m 2 size, at different sites in northern plains (Uttar Pradesh) India. Two regression models were used for each species; one using DBH only (Method 1) and the other using DBH and height (Method 2). The best fit models were chosen on the basis of highest R 2 . The DBH, AGB and carbon density yielded a positive relationship for all the species. Apart from Model D1h, all R 2 values for models developed with our data (both DBH and height) were above 99%. The R 2 values for models developed with DBH only were below 90%, least for model M1 (77.6%) The co-efficient for DBH was not significant in Model D1h and M1h, but the co-efficient for DBH and height was significant at the 5% level of significance for all other coefficients in all other models. The estimated stem AGB was maximum for Tectona grandis with 376.2 and 355.63 t/tree with carbon sequestration of 621.25 and 587.50 kg/ha for the equation T1 and T2H respectively; whereas minimum AGB was recorded for Dalbergia sisoo with 221.55 and 211.58 t/ha and carbon sequestration of 362.93 and 349.65 kg/ha. The AGB and carbon sequestration estimation obtained in this study represents a more realistic picture of biomass of region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信