正常眼巩膜性晶状体表现的初步临床探讨

M. Barnett, Jonathon E Ross, B. Durbin-Johnson
{"title":"正常眼巩膜性晶状体表现的初步临床探讨","authors":"M. Barnett, Jonathon E Ross, B. Durbin-Johnson","doi":"10.22374/JCLRS.V2I2.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nObjectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance (i.e. vision, comfort and fit) of spherical and front-surface toric scleral lenses in subjects with regular, healthy corneas. \nMethods: Scleral lenses were fitin the eyes (n = 16) of healthy subjects (n = 9) with regular corneas, absent of pathology, and studied using an observational, multi-visit design. Lens fit was objectively evaluatedby an experienced practitioner.Following 1 month of successful lens wear, participants completedsubjective satisfaction surveys regarding the scleral lens wearing experience. \nResults:  According to participant surveys, scleral lenses were subjectively preferred over soft toric or gas permeable contact lenses in 88% of eyes, including in all eyes fit with a front-surface toric scleral lens (n = 3). Seventy-five percent (75%) of eyes achieved visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR or better, while all eyes with prior spectacle wear achieved visual acuity with a scleral lens within 1 Snellen line of spectacle correction. Seventy-five percent (75%) of eyes achieved good subjective comfort with a scleral lens. No participants reported poor subjective vision and/or comfort. \nConclusions:  Our findings suggest that subjects preferred the performance of a scleral lens (spherical or front-surface toric) compared to a soft toric or gas permeable contact lens. Moreover, scleral lenses may provide a viable, alternative contact lens modality option for patients considering discontinuation of traditional soft toric and/or rigid contact lens wear; so long as the factors associated with hypoxia remain minimized. \nKey Words:  scleral lens; scleral contact lens; front-surface toric scleral lens; lens performance; normal eyes; healthy eyes","PeriodicalId":73690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of contact lens research & science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary Clinical Exploration of Scleral Lens Performance on Normal Eyes\",\"authors\":\"M. Barnett, Jonathon E Ross, B. Durbin-Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.22374/JCLRS.V2I2.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nObjectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance (i.e. vision, comfort and fit) of spherical and front-surface toric scleral lenses in subjects with regular, healthy corneas. \\nMethods: Scleral lenses were fitin the eyes (n = 16) of healthy subjects (n = 9) with regular corneas, absent of pathology, and studied using an observational, multi-visit design. Lens fit was objectively evaluatedby an experienced practitioner.Following 1 month of successful lens wear, participants completedsubjective satisfaction surveys regarding the scleral lens wearing experience. \\nResults:  According to participant surveys, scleral lenses were subjectively preferred over soft toric or gas permeable contact lenses in 88% of eyes, including in all eyes fit with a front-surface toric scleral lens (n = 3). Seventy-five percent (75%) of eyes achieved visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR or better, while all eyes with prior spectacle wear achieved visual acuity with a scleral lens within 1 Snellen line of spectacle correction. Seventy-five percent (75%) of eyes achieved good subjective comfort with a scleral lens. No participants reported poor subjective vision and/or comfort. \\nConclusions:  Our findings suggest that subjects preferred the performance of a scleral lens (spherical or front-surface toric) compared to a soft toric or gas permeable contact lens. Moreover, scleral lenses may provide a viable, alternative contact lens modality option for patients considering discontinuation of traditional soft toric and/or rigid contact lens wear; so long as the factors associated with hypoxia remain minimized. \\nKey Words:  scleral lens; scleral contact lens; front-surface toric scleral lens; lens performance; normal eyes; healthy eyes\",\"PeriodicalId\":73690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of contact lens research & science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of contact lens research & science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22374/JCLRS.V2I2.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of contact lens research & science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22374/JCLRS.V2I2.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要目的:本研究的目的是评估具有规则、健康角膜的受试者使用球形和前表面复曲面巩膜晶状体的性能(即视力、舒适度和贴合度)。方法:对健康受试者(n=9)的角膜规则、无病理的眼睛(n=16)进行巩膜镜检查,并采用观察性多访视设计进行研究。由一位经验丰富的从业者对镜片的贴合度进行了客观评估。在成功佩戴晶状体1个月后,参与者完成了关于巩膜晶状体佩戴体验的主体满意度调查。结果:根据参与者调查,88%的眼睛主观上更喜欢巩膜晶状体,而不是软复曲面或透气性隐形眼镜,包括所有佩戴前表面复曲面巩膜晶状体的眼睛(n=3)。百分之七十五(75%)的眼睛达到0.1 logMAR或更高的视力,而所有先前佩戴眼镜的眼睛在眼镜矫正的1 Snellen线内使用巩膜晶状体达到视力。百分之七十五(75%)的眼睛使用巩膜晶状体获得了良好的主观舒适度。没有参与者报告主观视觉和/或舒适度差。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与软复曲面或透气隐形眼镜相比,受试者更喜欢巩膜晶状体(球形或前表面复曲面)的性能。此外,巩膜镜片可以为考虑停止传统的软复曲面和/或刚性隐形眼镜佩戴的患者提供一种可行的替代隐形眼镜模式选择;只要与缺氧相关的因素保持最小化。关键词:巩膜晶状体;巩膜接触镜;前表面复曲面巩膜晶状体;镜头性能;正常眼;健康的眼睛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preliminary Clinical Exploration of Scleral Lens Performance on Normal Eyes
Abstract Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance (i.e. vision, comfort and fit) of spherical and front-surface toric scleral lenses in subjects with regular, healthy corneas. Methods: Scleral lenses were fitin the eyes (n = 16) of healthy subjects (n = 9) with regular corneas, absent of pathology, and studied using an observational, multi-visit design. Lens fit was objectively evaluatedby an experienced practitioner.Following 1 month of successful lens wear, participants completedsubjective satisfaction surveys regarding the scleral lens wearing experience. Results:  According to participant surveys, scleral lenses were subjectively preferred over soft toric or gas permeable contact lenses in 88% of eyes, including in all eyes fit with a front-surface toric scleral lens (n = 3). Seventy-five percent (75%) of eyes achieved visual acuity of 0.1 logMAR or better, while all eyes with prior spectacle wear achieved visual acuity with a scleral lens within 1 Snellen line of spectacle correction. Seventy-five percent (75%) of eyes achieved good subjective comfort with a scleral lens. No participants reported poor subjective vision and/or comfort. Conclusions:  Our findings suggest that subjects preferred the performance of a scleral lens (spherical or front-surface toric) compared to a soft toric or gas permeable contact lens. Moreover, scleral lenses may provide a viable, alternative contact lens modality option for patients considering discontinuation of traditional soft toric and/or rigid contact lens wear; so long as the factors associated with hypoxia remain minimized. Key Words:  scleral lens; scleral contact lens; front-surface toric scleral lens; lens performance; normal eyes; healthy eyes
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信