激进与变革教育的伦理

IF 1.5 4区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Adult Education Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-07-12 DOI:10.1177/07417136231187840

Chad Hoggan, Tetyana Hoggan-Kloubert

{"title":"激进与变革教育的伦理","authors":"Chad Hoggan, Tetyana Hoggan-Kloubert","doi":"10.1177/07417136231187840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a framework for ethics for radical and transformative education. Taking as a starting point ethical perspectives by which educators of adults are justified in imposing upon, coercing, and manipulating adult learners in the name of social justice, this article highlights the necessary connection between pedagogies and learning outcomes. It positions democracy, with its concomitant respect for human dignity, as the raison d'être of the field of adult education. Therefore, adult education practice should support democratic capabilities, respect learner autonomy, and allow for plurality. From both consequentialist and deontological ethical perspectives, it is argued that methods of instruction that undermine democracy cannot also be claimed to support democracy.","PeriodicalId":47287,"journal":{"name":"Adult Education Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ethics of Radical and Transformative Education\",\"authors\":\"Chad Hoggan, Tetyana Hoggan-Kloubert\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07417136231187840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents a framework for ethics for radical and transformative education. Taking as a starting point ethical perspectives by which educators of adults are justified in imposing upon, coercing, and manipulating adult learners in the name of social justice, this article highlights the necessary connection between pedagogies and learning outcomes. It positions democracy, with its concomitant respect for human dignity, as the raison d'être of the field of adult education. Therefore, adult education practice should support democratic capabilities, respect learner autonomy, and allow for plurality. From both consequentialist and deontological ethical perspectives, it is argued that methods of instruction that undermine democracy cannot also be claimed to support democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adult Education Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adult Education Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136231187840\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adult Education Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136231187840","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了一个激进和变革教育的伦理框架。本文以道德观点为出发点，强调教育学与学习结果之间的必要联系，通过道德观点，成年人的教育者有理由以社会正义的名义强加、胁迫和操纵成年学习者。它将民主及其对人的尊严的尊重定位为成人教育领域存在的理由。因此，成人教育实践应支持民主能力，尊重学习者自主性，并允许多元化。从后果论和义务论的伦理角度来看，有人认为，破坏民主的教学方法也不能被声称支持民主。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Ethics of Radical and Transformative Education

This article presents a framework for ethics for radical and transformative education. Taking as a starting point ethical perspectives by which educators of adults are justified in imposing upon, coercing, and manipulating adult learners in the name of social justice, this article highlights the necessary connection between pedagogies and learning outcomes. It positions democracy, with its concomitant respect for human dignity, as the raison d'être of the field of adult education. Therefore, adult education practice should support democratic capabilities, respect learner autonomy, and allow for plurality. From both consequentialist and deontological ethical perspectives, it is argued that methods of instruction that undermine democracy cannot also be claimed to support democracy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Adult Education Quarterly EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Adult Education Quarterly (AEQ) is a scholarly refereed journal committed to advancing the understanding and practice of adult and continuing education. The journal strives to be inclusive in scope, addressing topics and issues of significance to scholars and practitioners concerned with diverse aspects of adult and continuing education. AEQ publishes research employing a variety of methods and approaches, including (but not limited to) survey research, experimental designs, case studies, ethnographic observations and interviews, grounded theory, phenomenology, historical investigations, and narrative inquiry as well as articles that address theoretical and philosophical issues pertinent to adult and continuing education.