{"title":"自由主义对创造性信念的质疑","authors":"R. Sosa, A. Connor","doi":"10.1080/21650349.2020.1854121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Creativity is considered here as a universal and diverse capacity that is central to full human agency. This view contrasts with beliefs that negate one’s creativity and that of others. Self-reports of creativity are examined in this paper taking inspiration from the study of oppression and liberation in the praxis of social change by the influential education theorist Paulo Freire. An exploratory survey of one hundred and fifty-nine professionals examines the types of perceptions and beliefs that designers and non-designers have about their own creativity, the creativity of others, and how they explain the nature of creativity. Based on how respondents explain their own creative capacities and those of others, three initial categories are formulated based on theories of social change: oppressive, oppressed, and liberating views of creativity. The findings demonstrate how these categories can be interpreted and implications for future work are discussed in the closing section.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21650349.2020.1854121","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Freirean interrogation of creativity beliefs\",\"authors\":\"R. Sosa, A. Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21650349.2020.1854121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Creativity is considered here as a universal and diverse capacity that is central to full human agency. This view contrasts with beliefs that negate one’s creativity and that of others. Self-reports of creativity are examined in this paper taking inspiration from the study of oppression and liberation in the praxis of social change by the influential education theorist Paulo Freire. An exploratory survey of one hundred and fifty-nine professionals examines the types of perceptions and beliefs that designers and non-designers have about their own creativity, the creativity of others, and how they explain the nature of creativity. Based on how respondents explain their own creative capacities and those of others, three initial categories are formulated based on theories of social change: oppressive, oppressed, and liberating views of creativity. The findings demonstrate how these categories can be interpreted and implications for future work are discussed in the closing section.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21650349.2020.1854121\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2020.1854121\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2020.1854121","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT Creativity is considered here as a universal and diverse capacity that is central to full human agency. This view contrasts with beliefs that negate one’s creativity and that of others. Self-reports of creativity are examined in this paper taking inspiration from the study of oppression and liberation in the praxis of social change by the influential education theorist Paulo Freire. An exploratory survey of one hundred and fifty-nine professionals examines the types of perceptions and beliefs that designers and non-designers have about their own creativity, the creativity of others, and how they explain the nature of creativity. Based on how respondents explain their own creative capacities and those of others, three initial categories are formulated based on theories of social change: oppressive, oppressed, and liberating views of creativity. The findings demonstrate how these categories can be interpreted and implications for future work are discussed in the closing section.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.