实践与政策:关于越南占族宗教认同的论述

IF 0.4 3区社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES

Journal of Southeast Asian Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1017/S0022463422000868

W. Noseworthy, Pham Huyen

{"title":"实践与政策:关于越南占族宗教认同的论述","authors":"W. Noseworthy, Pham Huyen","doi":"10.1017/S0022463422000868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Past scholarship has described the Cham Bani religious community as a heterodox and syncretic version of Islam. We argue for a more nuanced interpretation: assertions of orthopraxy and heteropraxy shape contemporary debates in Cham communities in Vietnam. Based on a robust selection of source material—including the positions of government officials, high-ranking clerics, community members, and local activists, along with historicised anthropological accounts, Cham manuscripts, and government documents—our multidisciplinary approach, combining in-depth interviews and historical analysis, suggests religious classifications cannot be viewed as static in Cham communities, especially in the case of the ‘Cham Bani’, currently best thought of as a Cham particularist religious community.","PeriodicalId":46213,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southeast Asian Studies","volume":"53 1","pages":"733 - 761"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Praxis and policy: Discourse on Cham Bani religious identity in Vietnam\",\"authors\":\"W. Noseworthy, Pham Huyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0022463422000868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Past scholarship has described the Cham Bani religious community as a heterodox and syncretic version of Islam. We argue for a more nuanced interpretation: assertions of orthopraxy and heteropraxy shape contemporary debates in Cham communities in Vietnam. Based on a robust selection of source material—including the positions of government officials, high-ranking clerics, community members, and local activists, along with historicised anthropological accounts, Cham manuscripts, and government documents—our multidisciplinary approach, combining in-depth interviews and historical analysis, suggests religious classifications cannot be viewed as static in Cham communities, especially in the case of the ‘Cham Bani’, currently best thought of as a Cham particularist religious community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Southeast Asian Studies\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"733 - 761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Southeast Asian Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463422000868\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southeast Asian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463422000868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

过去的学术界将查姆巴尼宗教团体描述为伊斯兰教的异端和融合版本。我们主张有一个更微妙的解释：对整形和异整形的断言塑造了越南占族社区的当代辩论。基于对原始材料的大量选择——包括政府官员、高级神职人员、社区成员和当地活动家的职位，以及历史化的人类学描述、Cham手稿和政府文件——我们的多学科方法，结合深入采访和历史分析，这表明，在Cham社区中，宗教分类不能被视为静态的，尤其是在“Cham Bani”的情况下，它目前被认为是Cham特殊主义宗教社区。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Praxis and policy: Discourse on Cham Bani religious identity in Vietnam

Past scholarship has described the Cham Bani religious community as a heterodox and syncretic version of Islam. We argue for a more nuanced interpretation: assertions of orthopraxy and heteropraxy shape contemporary debates in Cham communities in Vietnam. Based on a robust selection of source material—including the positions of government officials, high-ranking clerics, community members, and local activists, along with historicised anthropological accounts, Cham manuscripts, and government documents—our multidisciplinary approach, combining in-depth interviews and historical analysis, suggests religious classifications cannot be viewed as static in Cham communities, especially in the case of the ‘Cham Bani’, currently best thought of as a Cham particularist religious community.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Southeast Asian Studies Multiple-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Southeast Asian Studies is one of the principal outlets for scholarly articles on Southeast Asia (Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, East Timor, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam). Embracing a wide range of academic disciplines in the humanities and social sciences, the journal publishes manuscripts oriented toward a scholarly readership but written to be accessible to non-specialists. The extensive book review section includes works in Southeast Asian languages. Published for the History Department, National University of Singapore.